Pros And Cons Of Search Warrants Essay

Improved Essays
Most people agree with search warrants and assume that they are keeping offenders out of the street and in jail lowering the crime rate when actually is doing the exact opposite.There are actually more cons than pros when it comes to search warrants and to think how accurate can they be on a lawful citizen.Think about it who wants their space to be intruded and personal information to be exposed to everyone over something so petite or not even anything to be accused of.Taking time to put actual facts together is better than falsely accusing someone and making fun of yourself and the victim, even out of the legal system the amount of people jumping to conclusion is growing tremendously over the years.
There is a point in everyone's life when they get caught in something that
…show more content…
In the newspaper article “LOOKING FOR TROUBLE? “ Joell Palmer proclaims “There's no benefit to this when people's rights are getting run over”, Meaning that why should people have to fight our rights when they get taken away. In this incident, Palmer was driving home when he hit police checkpoint, from where his car was searched. The officer searched his car which Palmer was okay with but stated that he “wasn't giving up all his rights” the officer then stated, "You have no rights." Once officer finished with searching his car and even with the search dog, they found no drugs. The fact that an officer that works to protect us citizens said ”you have no rights” Is unacceptable. Search warrants are taking rights away from citizens, Palmer did nothing to convince the cops that he had contraband in his vehicle.What about the article “COURT TO CONSIDER SEARCH CASE“? In this article Laurie Asseo gives several examples of a citizen getting their rights snatched away from them for invalid reasons. For example, there was a woman named Tera

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Bma Wurie Case Study

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The second case featured a man, Brima Wurie, who was arrested after a couple of police officers caught him in the middle of a drug deal. The officers seized two of Wurie’s cell phones and brought him back to the police station. Wurie’s flip phone kept receiving a call from the same number and the officer’s tracked it back to his apartment, where they “215 grams of crack cocaine and a loaded firearm.” Wurie was kept for drug and firearm charges that wouldn’t have been discovered if not for information presented by his flip phone during the warrantless search. The District Court denied Wurie’s request, which asked for the evidence obtained through the search to be thrown out, and then he was convicted.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments violated? Holding: The Trial Court held that the officer did have probable cause to search the vehicle and arrest the three men. The Supreme Court held that the officer did have probable cause to believe that Pringle had committed the crime of possession of a controlled substance. The Supreme Courts holding that the officer had probable cause to arrest Pringle also proves that the officer did not violate the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On October 7, 2008, the United States Supreme Court of Arizona argued case number 07-542, Arizona v. Grants and the decision towards the case was issued on April 21, 2009. Rodney Grant, the respondent/offender, was apprehended by the Arizona State Law enforcement/police because he was driving with a suspended driver’s license. Upon his apprehension and as he was securely placed in the back of the police vehicle, the police officers deliberately went ahead to search his automobile and found a bag of drugs/cocaine and a short gun. He was processed and taken to court for trial. At the session Grant moved his motion that the evidence found by the police needed to be suppressed since the officers used unlawful means to search his vehicle.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the search, police found things like a Uzi machine gun, a .38 caliber revolver, two stun guns, and a handcuff key, but did not find the supposedly stolen stuff. Police Officers did confiscate the weapons while in search for the stolen items and used it in court. So therefore his fourth amendment was violated. The 4th amendment states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " This action performed by the police officers reminds me of the supreme court case, Mapp V. Ohio.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However if the officer had pulled these individuals over soley based on the color of their skin, he would not be able to search and seize the individuals. The fourth amendment forbids an officer to search and seize soley on the basis of race, and if the officer had racially profiled the individuals then they could have filed a motion to suppress. However, the officer acted within the scope of the seizure by having legitimate interest and suspicions. The Fourth Amendment clearly states that an officer may search the person arrested, those in plain view of the officer and the accused, and things or places that the acussed person can touch, or that is otherwise in their immediate personal control without a warrant as long as there is legitimate reasoning and it is not an unreasonable search.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People V. Ulysis Parriss

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Diaz a cop saw some suspicious activity from defendant. Finally calling him over to him defendant kept putting his hand in front of his pocket where police notice a bulge in his pocket. Concerned for his safety fearing it might be a weapon the cop patted down the defendant to discover he was unarmed but he did have some vials. This case has to do with what I talked about earlier where the cops due to reasonable suspicion can pat you down. But they do not have the right to search you.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to chapter four, the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects all citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures of property (personal or otherwise) by law enforcement officers, hence the requirement of a search warrant. A search warrant is issued by a judge and is used to authorize law enforcement officers to search a particular location and seize specific items, most often suspected evidence. The first and by far the most important step in obtaining a search warrant is to show probable cause that a crime was committed and that the items in question or connected to the crime are very likely to be found in the specific place named in the warrant. In order for the search warrant to be deemed valid it must first…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This of course must occur through proper procedures and without the violation of constitutional law, which we discussed though the beginning of this research paper. The main reason for the establishment of the Bill of Rights is to protect the people against governments’ power. A search occurs “when and expectation of privacy that society is prepared to consider reasonable is infringed (Cox, McCamey, & Scaramella, 2014, p. 207). Law enforcement first and foremost must establish probable cause or reasonable suspicion to detain a person or seize someone’s property. A seizure of property occurs when there is some meaningful interference with and individual’s possessory interests in that property (Cox, McCamey, & Scaramella, 2014, p. 207).…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”( Interests Protected law.cornell.edu). Probable cause is if there something that's easily to tell that something's wrong or not right. Like if it's a murder scene or they can smell drugs or smell alcohol in the car. But very many cases are being dismissed because of the failure of the use of a search warrant. Even though that really isn’t a good thing it assures you because of the fourth amendment you can't go to prison because it’s a cop's word against a civilians.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment In Texas

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As well the court also stated that detaining a person to require him to identify himself with lack of evidence against him/her violates their Fourth Amendment right. The Fourth Amendment requires such action,or that the seizure should be carried out pursuant to plan embodying explicit,neutral limitations of individual officers. In other words, a police officer can’t arrest you,detain you,or search you without a search warrant or an arrest warnat. Though there are some expectations on getting search or being detained,like for instances if a police officer asks your permission to search in your belongings and you agree then that’s not considered an intrusion of your privacy because you allowed him/her to search in your belongings. Same goes for being arrested because in order to be charged with a crime police officers must have reasonable suspicion and enough evidence to charge you with that crime.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda Rights state that anyone in police custody must be told four things before being questioned: (1) they have the right to remain silent, meaning that they do not have to say anything; (2) anything they say can and will be used against them in court; (3) they have the right to a lawyer; and (4) if they cannot afford a lawyer, one will be appointed for them. Underage minors should always have legal representation when being interrogated for an alleged crime because they're not always aware of or understand their rights. The Miranda Rights is a right to silence warning given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody before they are interrogated to preserve the admissibility of their statements against them in criminal proceedings. The Supreme Court confirmed that the Miranda Rights are constitutionally required because of a case called Miranda v. Arizona…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This paper is going to explain who can issue a search warrant, the grounds on why a search warrant will be issued, who issues it, and the people and location to be searched, and items that can be seized. I will also be informing you on who can issue a search and seizure warrant. I have attached a search and seizure warrant. The search and seizure falls under the Fourth Amendment. Let me begin with what a search warrant consists of.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Warrantless Searches Essay

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When someone closes the door to their house and locks it, they get a sense of feeling of privacy and safety as if that door could stop anything or anyone from coming through it. As a citizen of the United States you were guaranteed this right when the Bill of Rights was written and passed. The Fourth Amendment protects you from any unreasonable search and seizures, no warrants shall be issued without probable cause, supported by Oath. There are many different types of warrants and many exceptions to when a warrant is and is not needed for search and seizure. Back in the early 1900s police officers did a lot of things that we would consider in today’s age as abuse of power, and police brutality.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Stop and frisk tactics have been used to preserve public safety and officer well-being. A stop and frisk is a non-intrusive police stop and pat-down based on the reasonable suspicion in relation to a crime that has happened, will happen, or is in the process of being carried out (Cornell Law School, 2017). Stop and frisk situations are highly common and the reported instances have increased by approximately 7% annually (Hovhannisyan, 2006). However, the approach is highly controversial because it operates primarily on officers' perceptions and opinions, which opens the door to personal prejudices dictating the usage. This executive summary includes the advantages and disadvantages involved in stop and frisk procedures as well as the constitutionality and recommendations to improve the approach.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays