Wouldn’t it be great if we all had our own personal officer? Well, with the residential police program, that fantasy can be a reality. The residential police program is a program where officers live and work in troubled neighborhoods and provide police service. The officer or officers, would do their police duty in the community and neighborhood they are living in. As a result, residents will see a better quality of life through the works of problem solving and drug stoppage by the residential officers.…
The Political era of policing stemmed through the 1840s to the 1930s. This particular method relied highly of political gain. Police officers were used by Politicians as way to control neighborhoods. The advantages of the political era of policing allowed community interest to be main priority; therefore, community policing was said to be an effective tool. The disadvantages of the political era were politicians had immediate control over the departments and unfortunately recruitment was entitled to the politician’s discretion.…
The second reform option is police oversight. This is making the law enforcement officers take responsibility for their actions. Oversight agencies observe a certain police department and hold the officers accountable for their actions. At the moment, police agencies are often resistant to taking responsibility for wrongdoings. Police oversight would restore trust in a law enforcement structure.…
This is because police officers play and important role in crime control and correctional population.4 A report by the Brennan Center was done to try to fill in the gap in research on the affect policing has on crime. In the 1990s, there were innovations in the way policing was done. Those innovations include “increases in the number of police officers on the street; community, problem-solving, and ‘zero-tolerance’ policing. ”1…
There has been talk about the black community creating their own policing today. This form of policing would protect the black youth and have the black youth best interest at hand. The government has successfully stopped the Black Panther Movement but The KKK calls their duties community policing and the United States government is completely fine with it. The KKK and their tactics are the complete opposite of policing. They cause more damage than good but they are policing for their people and their communities.…
It helps improve the legitimacy within the department. Another benefit related to this topic is that it can help improve the “effectiveness and sensitivity of policing” (Wood). The officers gain skills that could be used in community engagement and combating certain threats. The main argument in…
Also, under pressures from the reformers the police unions gave significant raises to all rank filled members of the departments, in which patrol officers saw the average increase of 80% in their salaries and supervisors saw an increase of 33 to 100% more (Panzarella & Vona, pg 233-234). Furthermore, Fogelson notes that the course of police reform raised several concerns regarding police autonomy, the rights of citizens, and civil rights. Many Americans believed that the reforming policies had done too much good and harm for the police by which they successfully separated policing from politics, yet at the same time they separated policing from public control. In other words, the police moved out of place from democratic society to the degree…
The last advantage that I noted when doing the research was that the zero tolerance approach would be very beneficial. Having officers focus on a high crime neighborhood and getting them to crackdown on minor offences can lead to a reduction in more serious offences. This can be very beneficial, as similar to before, can result in neighborhoods around the area to stop their criminal activities as they have a stronger chance at getting caught.…
Of course what the officers did was completely wrong and unethical, they murdered two innocent people and wounded four others. I believe these officers were served with their own taste of the law. What each officer got was well deserved. They broke the law which they were held up high to uphold, they decided to drop their police ethics, responsibilities and integrity for an unfortunate situation. Unlike normal civilians, police officers should be held double accountable for their actions.…
If I were to try and fix the criminal justice so that the players in the system are forced to care I would make sure that it is acknowledged that there is a problem with our Criminal Justice system. In order to fix our system, we have to start with the persons making the arrest. All police officer should wear bodycams whiles on duty. We have to start to reform our nations criminal justice sentencing laws. We have to stop seeing poor communities as high violent areas and dangerous and treat them like any other community.…
The final proposal for an alternative to the current punitive model in criminal justice is building a network of community justice centres that are based on principles of restorative justice (McElrea, 2007). This proposal emerged from the report Restorative Justice – The Long View by Judge Fred McElrea in 2007. In 1990, McElrea was appointed as a youth court judge in the first year of operation of the new youth justice system (McElrea, 2011). In addition to working in the adult district court, McElrea was able to compare the two processes from the experience and knowledge gained in the youth and adult court. At the time, restorative justice principles became paramount in shaping the way the youth court system works (McElrea, 2011).…
A brief review of the book “The Little Book of Restorative Justice,” by Howard Zehr, is based upon one idea, how should this society respond to wrong doings and what should be done with the victims and offenders? The book begins by telling us that the criminal justice system is not meeting the needs of the people with in that system, ultimately the system is failing however there still may be some good qualities. Zehr expresses that, “restorative justice is an attempt to address some of the needs and limitations,” (3) and by doing this he first tells his audience what restorative justice is not, to give us, his readers a better understanding of what it really is. Also to you could say that he does this so we can have a stronger foundation while learning what, The Little Book of Restorative Justice,” is and not being completely biased…
This is where disgracing the suspect has been used as way of punishment for the suspect’s wrongdoings. Minority communities, which includes Latinos ,African Americans, Native American sand Canadian Mennonites, have also been a part of different restorative justice practices over the course of many years (Grant & Gumz, 2009). Restorative justice has been used as an umbrella term, as a protector, for various practice approaches within these communities. Although these kinds of practices are used in an exclusive manner by mutual agreement, differences across the categories have begun to blur their visions for these programs. There are three different types of restorative justice that have been explored and they include: 1) victim–offender mediation, 2) family group conferencing and 3) peacemaking circles.…
Introduction: Restorative justice is the idea that harm caused by a crime can be repaired (Wallis, 2007) and that the victim and community can be restored to how it was previously, rather than resorting to punishing the offender…
Restorative Justice resolution could be one of the option for this scenario. Restorative justice is an effective response to conflict and crime because what it does is it starts with people involved. So, in this scenario, victims have a chance to be heard and understood. They can express an impact of the situation, they can even ask questions and receive information. Offenders can express genuine remorse and learn from their experience.…