Pros And Cons Of Parliamentary Policies

Great Essays
Many people argue with the viewpoint on the despotism of Parliamentary Policies. Some argue that the British imperial policies towards America were set in place to rob Americans from their natural rights, basically enslaving them. Others argue that it was a convenient idea to justify rebellion for self-serving reasons. I believe that the parliamentary policies robbed Americans from their natural rights. The British policies were irrational for Americans giving them the right to start an American Independence movement to gain that feeling of freedom. Two university students gave their takes on whether or not they believed that the parliamentary policies were justified or not. Kim Klein, a student at Shippensburg University, argued that the colonial policies of parliament violated Americans’ right as Englishmen. John D. Fair, a student at Georgia College, argued that the parliament was justified in tightening loopholes in its imperial administration of the 13 colonies and insisting that Americans recognize their supremacy. To begin, both the authors had some pros’ to their argument. Klein opposed the parliamentary policies. She stated that Americans viewed the policies as abusive to their imperial relationship with Britain and their constitutional rights alone. When the Americans received news that Britain were going to pass legislative laws that would tax them for all sorts, they protested in efforts to levy the taxes with motives that the taxes were largely unreasonable. When the British colony went to war with the French in the Seven Years’ War, Massachusetts contributed largely to this victory. Due to the involvement of Massachusetts in the war, its residents were proposed with high taxes and public debt that nearly costed them bankruptcy. The American colonies already had to face a severe economic recession in results of the war but yet, Britain wanted to tax them even more. Britain was already in a excessive amount a debt so they attempted to brush the cost of the war off on the Americans. Many of the parliamentary policies that Britain proposed were set in order raise revenue or regulate trade. The Americans opposed their revenue raising policies, stating that Britain did not have the right to tax them since they were not directly represented in parliament. Only the local representatives in the American colonies knew what type and the amount of taxes that could be reasonably removed from their constitutions. The Proclamation of 1763 threatened to severely circumscribe America’s economic and physical expansion. Other British policies were forcing Americans to pay and supply their probable tyrant. Colonist throughout North America opposed these measures in every way conceivable. Many colonist signed petitions, economic boycotts, threats, and violence. Many Americans labeled these policies as unconstitutional and unjust, feeling that these British policies would only be enslaving them under Britain’s power, later leading on to Americans wanting to be separated away from Britain. Many influential British office holders agreed with America’s assessment of the British policies. Americans resisted the partaking in the policies that Britain had designed and wanted to declare independence from them. The petition for the Declaration of Independence had many signatures leading on to the victory of independence for Americans in 1776. Contrasting Klein’s argument, Fair believed that the parliamentary policies was a great idea. In his argument Fair stated that the British parliamentary policies created an ideal balance between a king, his lords, and the commons, and it was admired for bringing stability and prosperity through a judicious blend of freedom and order. If the British system was so admirable to others then it caused no harm to the American …show more content…
The British proposed these parliamentary policies after the Seven Years’ War. These policies were set in place to raise revenue in order to pay for the damage that the war had caused as well as regulate trade. The Americans did not agree to any of these policies. The British thought that the Americans should not have a problem with the policies since they were admirable to other. The Americans rebelled against these policies. Some influential British leaders also agreed with the Americans. The Americans opposed these policies until they were granted with the freedom from the Declaration of Independence becoming individual colonies on July 4,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It was necessary for America to declare its independence from England. The reasons why it was necessary include Americans did not want to pay the King's taxes, Americans wanted sovereignty, Americans wanted freedom of religion, Americans demanded freedom of speech, and Americans desired equality for everyone. The first American objection to British policy came after Parliament passed a taxation measure created to raise capital for the British Army.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    King George Dbq

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Scope: The scope of this investigation will focus on King George III’s political actions towards the American colonists, and assess whether or not King George III was acting like a tyrant. Word Count: 92 B- Summary of evidence…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Social Contract Dbq

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The colonists were justified in resisting British policies after the French and Indian War because they considered themselves British citizens whose rights from The English Bill of Rights were being violated, their Social Contract was being violated, and they had tried to compromise with the British government but they wouldn’t compromise. First, the colonists considered themselves British citizens living abroad and as citizens they were protected by the English Bill of Rights. But their rights such as no standing army during times of peace were being violated. Second, because the ideas of a Social Contract said that if the government violated the rights of the people, colonists had the right to replace the British government with a better…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around the 1770’s, the British had extended their mercantilistic policies of trade restrictions and economic control. Creating laws and looking out for the crown’s interest, they began to tax the American Colonists. When the colonists retaliated, England responded with a larger military presence. These economic and military policies threatened the colonies.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We Americans suffered for long time before we gained liberty, and it all started with Britain’s unfair control over colonists. The American Revolution, the battles of destruction and the fight for independence, the colonists were done with the abuse and neglect from Britain, therefore colonists united to stand against Britain’s selfish control. But, were the colonists right in breaking up with Britain and fighting for their right as an independent country? Well yes, Americans were justified in waging war with Britain because of violation of English rights, lack of representation in parliament, and zero approval of colonists on Acts and Taxes. Americans starting war with Britain was necessary because of violation of English rights.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In making the decision to rebel against the British, the colonists were time and time again presented with reason as to why they should retaliate. John Adams, Abigail Adams, and Thomas Jefferson's considered their rebellion a “noble cause” that was morally, politically, and socially justified. For John Adams, there was an immense social justification for America’s emancipation from Britain. This is because John strongly advocated for the selection of leaders based on character, education, experience, and principles, but Britain’s rule over the states was a complete tyranny.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American colonists were justified in breaking up with Great Britain due to the unfair laws and taxes. The American colonists were justified in breaking up with great britain because Britain had a tight hold around all of their colonists by taxing them unfairly and making crazy laws. The Americans were tired of the kings unfair acts so they decided to write a breakup letter (The Declaration of Independence). Thomas Jefferson was the main DOI author and publisher. When Great Britain heard about the DOI they weren't very happy.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    From 1760 to 1776 the American colonies and the British went back and forth. The British wanted to control the colonies whilst the colonies wanted to break free from England. The British put in place different Acts trying to force the colonies to stay with them. Most of the time the colonist did not like these Acts so they would rebel causing the British to retaliate and put more Acts in place.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    British victory in The Seven Years’ War (French-Indian War between 1756-1763) left Britain with tremendous debt and the British government decided that the American colonies, who benefited the most from this war, should pay part of the war’s costs. To achieve this goal, the British Parliament passed a series of acts designed to pay the debt with colonial assistance. The American colonists were not happy with such tight control. The first act passed by the British Parliament on April 5, 1764 was The Sugar Act, also called Plantation Act, or Revenue Act, with the goal of raising 100,000 pounds, an amount equal to one-fifth of the military expenses in North America. This act was a modified version of the Molasses Act of 1733.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sons Of Liberty Dbq

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Furthermore, even though the high and unfair taxes highly affected the colonist, the cause for aspiration of democracy was that colonist weren’t represented in the British Parliament. Due to the limitations that the Stamp Act, and many more, enforced cause Americans to boycott and protest in order to get involve in the British government. The Sons of Liberty, a group of workers and laborers that were against the high taxations, fought for the rights of the colonist “…the Sons of Liberty found it necessary to use their influence to moderate the resentments of the people…” (70). What is more, the Sons of Liberty were responsible for the Boston Tea Party, by which King George responded by passing the Coercive Acts, therefore restraining the rights…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the period between the start of the French and Indian War and the Declaration of Independence, Parliament implemented a myriad of oppressive laws that sparked outrage from anti-British colonists. An example of one of these restrictive laws would be the Proclamation Line of 1763, which was issued by Great Britain to put a stop to future conflicts with Native Americans by forbidding English colonists from settling upon lands they had spilt blood to win from the French. In addition, the economic practice of mercantilism formed a parasitic relationship between Great Britain and the Thirteen Colonies, for the former benefited at the expense of the latter. Furthermore, the Declaratory Act of 1766 was passed to establish complete British political dominance over the Thirteen Colonies, which the Patriots weren’t exactly happy about since they were accustomed to the unusual amounts of freedom they enjoyed while living under salutary neglect.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the most well known causes of the American Revolution was the taxation of the colonies without either their consent or representation in Great British Parliament. Not only the taxation, but also the audacity the Americans felt the British had to assert their power is generally seen as a cause to war. The Concordians felt as if “the law was more than a raid on property: it robbed Americans of their basic rights… Since Americans were not represented in Parliament, the stamp duty was plainly unconstitutional.” (35).…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Take the Quartering Act for example. Instead of going to their own houses, the British soldiers went to the colonist homes’, which meant they would use up all of their supplies and use their food. For instance in the text it states, “The Quartering Act: required colonists to pay for the housing of British soldiers”. They not only we forced to supply the soldiers but they were forced to have them sleep wherever they want in their homes, like their beds or couches for instance. Also, the British government made them pay an unreasonable amount of taxes, so when they recruit the soldiers they have to provide for them which means they must pay the additional taxes.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King George III and the British accumulated a massive debt after the French and Indian war. British Funds experience a dramatic shortage, so Parliament was forced to place taxes on the colonists to offset the accrued war expenses. Paying off the debt from the seven-year war was King George’s main concern. By taxing anyone who was neglected during the seven years’ war the British funds could add to their empire thus by strengthening it more. Taxation came in many forms, the first was the Sugar Act (1764), the Stamp Act (1765) and the Townshend Duties (1767).…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many colonies kept accepting the British rules until 1772. However, in 1773, there was a direct protest by colonies against The Boston Tea tax that had been set by Great Britain. The act was about to raise the tea tax on the American colonies. Samuel Adams and some of the sons of liberty created a group to violate the British ships which caused to the Coercive Act that passed by British governments to punish the colonies and specifically Boston in 1774. Coercive Act restricted the colonies of practicing their religion, restoring order in Massachusetts, and punishing the Bostonians which led the American’s disobedience to gather and prepared for a war.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays