Political Parties

Improved Essays
Political parties are of eminent importance in guiding the activity of modern liberal democracies and they simultaneously act to support and to subvert the principles that envelop democracy. The organisation of the masses into cohesive entities where political power can be aggregated is one of the most important functions carried out by political parties as it feasibly allows the average member of the populace to participate in the democratic political process. Accountability of the ruling government is a key fixture of modern liberal democracies and political parties provide a basis through which a viable alternative government is legitimised through the formation of opposition parties and shadow ministries. The relationship between pressure …show more content…
The notion of ‘responsible government’ that underpins the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy is intimately intertwined with political parties, as the executive arm of government must command the confidence of the lower chamber of Parliament which in effect compels the executive to rely on the support of the political parties that represent the electorate. The tremendous impact of political parties in their relation to responsible government was perhaps most sensationally evident in the events surrounding the successful 1979 motion of no confidence in the British Labour government of James Callaghan; this motion, which passed by merely one vote, was conducted almost entirely along party lines which demonstrates that political parties are in practice the most fundamental and important unit of organisation towards determining the nature and composition of the government. In addition, political parties provide an additional avenue through which the government can be held to account by enabling the largest opposition party (or coalition of parties) to form a shadow ministry. The Shadow Cabinet in Australia is an important institution towards coalescing the Opposition into an entity that can viably be considered as an alternative government and as such it has been described as “the primary way in which an Opposition can legitimise itself …show more content…
Pressure groups have historically been a key influencing force in establishing the agenda pursued by political parties and in some instances, such as the relation between trade unions and the Australian Labor Party, both the pressure group and the party have essentially become completely reliant on each other’s continued support to maintain their power. When discussing the merits of pressure group politics it is necessary to continually refer back to the role of political parties because the nature of the relationship between interest groups and institutions of power is largely shaped by the position on the political spectrum of the party in which they seek to influence. In some respects, the prominent position of pressure groups in modern democratic politics can be thought of as a positive development due to the premise that they “offer a means of representation which supplements the electoral system” which is often used to further the agenda of minority groups such as AIDS victims in instances where they would otherwise be overlooked by traditional electoral politics. Conversely, critics of the close relationship between pressure groups and political parties assert that in many cases the will of the people as expressed through elections is undermined

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Contrary to the rational-actor theory that she sets as a contrast, where independent political actors decide on actions based exclusively on rational thought and logical cost-benefit analyses, her polis instead distinguishes between the “political community” and “cultural community,” respectively the citizens of a nation and the plethora of mutually affiliated subgroups inside the state. Instead of exclusively prioritizing the political community, Stone’s polis model fixates on the bilateral relationship between policy makers and their broader societies – both politically and culturally – in composing publicly-accepted stories. Committees, naturally, play into Stone’s theory more so than Parliament as a whole: special interest groups and other subgroups, after all, are essentially optimized to interact with committees openly through expert interviews, the focus more on public hearings instead of in camera, and formal lobbying. This underlining narrative consequently guides committee decisions and policy acceptance; it relies on the basic assumption of a political community iterations more complex than Stone’s throw-away example of Robinson Crusoe landing on a beach with presumably little else than a fig leaf, an apple and rational decision-making. Bridging across communities simply requires political motives to be discrete enough to tie the various cultural communities and political entity within the…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Labour Party In Australia

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Australian Labor Party is the oldest political organization in the political history of Australia, since it was formed in the 1890s and it had a representative in the first federal government that was elected in 1901. The major purpose of its formation was the early trade unions that existed by that period, and since then, it has maintained a close relationship with the trade unions in Australia. The party’s national platform provides the supporters and members with a clear outline of labor’s values, beliefs and government programs. Generally, the party’s platform has been progressive since its formation, this is in terms of political, economic and social progression, which has not been to the liking of the known conservative electorate. However,…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The political parties have changed in many ways. Some keep same names. For the most part though they change. The people often keep the same demographic, names, and principles. This means that they kept the same values in the political parties.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    [b]Door-to-door x3[/b] Local candidate William A. Whitaker goes door-to-door in Wales. "We trusted them in 1979, 1983 , 1987, 1992 and 1997. But they didn't deliver what they promised, 5 elections in a row, time and time again we were misled. This election is all about change. No more lies, no more broken promises.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 2015 the Liberals engineered one of the greatest political comebacks of a generation going from thirty-four seats in parliament to a stunning one hundred and eight four, despite the fact they were trailing in third place when the campaign began (Andrew-Gee, 2015). A victory of this margin deserves to be analyzed if for the mere fact that the Liberal Party will use the victory as a mandate to enact their agenda. This paper will argue that the Liberal Party’s victory was the result of a adept campaign that was able to capitalize on the advantages given to it. This paper will be organized in the following way.…

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Since the result of the 2010 Australian federal election, the issue of whether or not the health of Australia’s liberal democracy necessitating a two party system is debated academically. In this essay it is argued that a two party system is not essential thus the opposing proposition not confirmed by the result of the election. Relevant and contemporary arguments are presented in support of the premise that a hung parliament is of benefit to the health of Australia’s liberal democracy. First, academic definitions of Australia’s liberal democracy and tow party system are discussed. Second, research shows a two party system as an elitist system supported by neo liberalists and an affront to liberal democratic principles.…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Writing at the same time as Confederation, Walter Bagehot argued the superiority of the British Westminster system is because “[t]he natural tendency of the members of every legislature is to make themselves conspicuous.” Democratic legitimacy, Bagehot inferred, pre-empts either vocal or legislative dissent – and not ipso facto into vehicles for activist decision-making in governmental affairs. Accordingly, given Cabinet acts as the predominant “buckle” fusing the executive and the legislative branches together, the “mixed motives” for the lower House will in Bagehot’s conceptualization constantly “urge them to oppose the executive” in the legislature, if only due to the virtue that “[t]hey are embodying the purposes of others if they aid; they are advancing their own opinions if they defeat”. Voting Cabinet down, in theory, is the primary modus operandi for specialist MPs in Westminster-style democracies to voice their constituents’ concerns in session, notwithstanding the politicized Question Period (QP), member statements, opposition days where the opposition controls the House agenda, parliamentary debates, informal lobbying in caucus or in all-party parliamentary groups, and the exceptional Private Members’ Business (PMB) to sift through the adversarial party system to gain enough cross-party support – and finally, of…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political Parties Dbq

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    DBQ: How Political Parties Developed Political parties are organization of people which seek to achieve goals that can help certain people in a particular region. Political parties are developed because of the expansion of the United States. With more people with new ideas and political belief, people can now state their own opinion and can give the people a chance to be heard fairly and equally. Political parties has been around since the early and mid-1700s. Being one of the first political parties of the United States were the Whigs party.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Two that are particularly important concepts are collective responsibility and accountability. Collective responsibility, in this context, means that the majority party, or Governing party possess all power and thus all blame if a bill does not pass. When one states accountability, that person means that the actions of the majority party- both good and bad- are accounted for while in office, and voters hold them accountable by either re-electing the party members next election or vote in members of the opposing party. A political party is a group of people who come together to agree on a basic platform and to promote their views by participating in governmental elections. Party discipline is responsible for keeping its elected members in line while in office because opposing the party’s overall platform will result in someone else replacing their seat in the next election.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australia’s parliamentary system is categorised as a fusion as opposed to a separation of powers as the executive branch is answerable and part of the legislative branch. Each branch of government should work within their areas of responsibility so they act like checks and balances on each other with 100 years of stable government testifying to its effectiveness. A fourth way which holds the governmental branches accountable is the citizens of the country, they form a check and balance system. Citizens are able to judge a government come election time but Parliament holds governments responsible for their actions in-between elections (Fenna, 2014). Australia uses a liberal system of government which implies that there is a need to have limits of the power of governments as indicated by (Fenna, 2014).…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Domestic controversies in the 19th century, forced Americans to align themselves with a political party, hindering national unity. George Washington reasoned that: “However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends… unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government.” Here, Washington foresees the political dissention that will ensue nearly a century later, and the men who will subsequently abuse their attained power. The Antebellum period encompasses the years between the War of 1812 and the Civil War. Slavery, immigration, and economics served as chief battleground issues for antebellum political parties.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ultimate goal of most politically inclined interest group are to shape public polices in way that it supports the group’s interests, values, or beliefs. This goal is accomplished in two strategies in which sometimes both is used, one is the electoral strategy which is an attempt to influence the selection of public officials. Second strategy is the legislative strategy which is to influence the decisions that elected officials, bureaucrats, or members of the judiciary make. For those interests groups that decide to use the electoral strategy they do so by using tactics such as campaign spending, endorsements, voter mobilization and education, and…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Compared to the Presidential system, the Parliamentary system is more favourable to a healthy democracy. This essay will discuss the relationship between the Parliamentary and Presidential systems’ executive and legislative powers and the ways they differ from one another. Within the Parliamentary system, the executive and legislative powers are fused together to set and control the government (Mintz et al. 331-332).…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two different systems of a democratic government, parliamentary and presidential, which are seen in multiple countries across the world. World powers such as the Canada and the United Kingdom thrive with their parliamentary system while the United States of America has shown stability and power with their presidential system. While both parliamentary and presidential systems have benefits and drawbacks, parliamentary systems are evidently more democratic because it gives majority of its power to the people by allowing them to call for a vote of no confidence and not setting maximum limits to prime minister term periods. This paper will compare and contrast the two democratic systems, discuss the benefits and critiques of each and finally examine why…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Politics in America has always been an evolving by either social, economic, or political decisions. It has continually changed since it’s founding in America. Politics came as a result of the transgressions committed and the white male sufferage. As more white males won the right to vote and political parties came more organized, the aspect of American politics changed. The early politics of America was very chaotic which in turn bred feelings of discontent with politicians.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays