REVOLT OF PLEBIANS
Patricians and the Plebians had join hands to make their city comfortable to everyone unknowingly to them that Patricians would still show them demarcation and that they do not possess equal right. After the struggle to send away the kings. Unequal treatment between the Patricians and the Plebians led to Plebians revolt.
It is quite unfortunate, that after the Plebians could be part of election to elect the senate while the Plebians were not given opportunity to hold a seat in the senate. This is an indication that they would not be able to take part of the decision making on the matters of the state and on issues in their communities which in my own opinion I would say, that they are marginalized which is not good enough for people …show more content…
The Plebians are perpetually poor while the Patricians are swimming in riches and there was no mechanism put in place to for even distribution of wealth among the hardworking citizens, this is not fair.
Aristocratic rule, where the government and the power is in the hands of few without recourse to others, was another grievance of the Plebians. I would have love to see all encompassing government that would accommodate both the Plebians and the Patricians if the top offices would be given to Patricians it wouldn’t have become an issue but no, the power is concentrated in the hands of few patricians, hence the revolt of the Plebians.
There was total neglect on the protection of the Plebians just as when the Plebians go for war in the name of the Rome, their proportion was not protected because it is in the country and there are no walls to protect it.
During the war, whenever the Plebians properties are destroyed, the Plebians would have to borrow to do their repairs. But the law attached to borrowing was very harsh such that it often returned the Plebians into slavery due to their inability to satisfy borrowing
Patricians and the Plebians had join hands to make their city comfortable to everyone unknowingly to them that Patricians would still show them demarcation and that they do not possess equal right. After the struggle to send away the kings. Unequal treatment between the Patricians and the Plebians led to Plebians revolt.
It is quite unfortunate, that after the Plebians could be part of election to elect the senate while the Plebians were not given opportunity to hold a seat in the senate. This is an indication that they would not be able to take part of the decision making on the matters of the state and on issues in their communities which in my own opinion I would say, that they are marginalized which is not good enough for people …show more content…
The Plebians are perpetually poor while the Patricians are swimming in riches and there was no mechanism put in place to for even distribution of wealth among the hardworking citizens, this is not fair.
Aristocratic rule, where the government and the power is in the hands of few without recourse to others, was another grievance of the Plebians. I would have love to see all encompassing government that would accommodate both the Plebians and the Patricians if the top offices would be given to Patricians it wouldn’t have become an issue but no, the power is concentrated in the hands of few patricians, hence the revolt of the Plebians.
There was total neglect on the protection of the Plebians just as when the Plebians go for war in the name of the Rome, their proportion was not protected because it is in the country and there are no walls to protect it.
During the war, whenever the Plebians properties are destroyed, the Plebians would have to borrow to do their repairs. But the law attached to borrowing was very harsh such that it often returned the Plebians into slavery due to their inability to satisfy borrowing