According to Zvi Gabbay (2005) the arguments by the defence team may in some cases of victim crimes can cause further harm to the individual because they aim to find doubt in the the victims statements through cross examinations. For example, the defence team tends to find ways to place some blame on a victim or find doubt in their recollection of the incident (Gabbay, 2005 p.352). These issues demonstrate why victim advocates, criminologist and world governments believe Restorative Justice practices may be a better alternative to the conventional system because it puts the victims recovery and reconciliation in the centre of its proceedings, which should give them more power to decide on the of the offender to a
According to Zvi Gabbay (2005) the arguments by the defence team may in some cases of victim crimes can cause further harm to the individual because they aim to find doubt in the the victims statements through cross examinations. For example, the defence team tends to find ways to place some blame on a victim or find doubt in their recollection of the incident (Gabbay, 2005 p.352). These issues demonstrate why victim advocates, criminologist and world governments believe Restorative Justice practices may be a better alternative to the conventional system because it puts the victims recovery and reconciliation in the centre of its proceedings, which should give them more power to decide on the of the offender to a