Over the past twenty years there has been a big push to come up with alternatives to incarceration, with the purposes of reducing prison and jail populations and reduce the cost to the tax payers with a positive integration of offenders into society. The key objection from opponents to this effort was that the government entities pushing for the alternatives to incarceration would bypass or ignore the rights of the victims to these crimes (V.C. Archive. (N.D.).
The states indicated that the creation of these alternatives would give the criminal court systems more options regarding sentencing, would safe tax payer money, strengthen communities and families, reduce recidivism, and provide for those in need of substance abuse programs and Mental health treatment, thus reducing overall crime rates.
The proponents to the alternatives pointed at programs such as drug court which closely supervised qualified individuals in treatment programs, Diversion programs structured to the first-time offender who had committed misdemeanor crimes. This program would focus on the crime, structuring programs targeting the particular crime committed. Veterans court which focuses on the military veteran that for any given reason has found themselves negatively involved in the criminal justice system. The program …show more content…
In certain states the rights of the victim have been so clearly heard that sentencing focus strongly on the restoration and making whole again aspect of the criminal justice process. The concept is “Restorative Justice” (FAMM - Families Against Mandatory Minimums. (07/2011) in which goals are set forth involving victim restitution, victim-offender mediation programs, community service, and conditions of probation. In conclusion the involvement of the victim has become an integrate part of the court system, in the sentencing and the rehabilitation of the
The states indicated that the creation of these alternatives would give the criminal court systems more options regarding sentencing, would safe tax payer money, strengthen communities and families, reduce recidivism, and provide for those in need of substance abuse programs and Mental health treatment, thus reducing overall crime rates.
The proponents to the alternatives pointed at programs such as drug court which closely supervised qualified individuals in treatment programs, Diversion programs structured to the first-time offender who had committed misdemeanor crimes. This program would focus on the crime, structuring programs targeting the particular crime committed. Veterans court which focuses on the military veteran that for any given reason has found themselves negatively involved in the criminal justice system. The program …show more content…
In certain states the rights of the victim have been so clearly heard that sentencing focus strongly on the restoration and making whole again aspect of the criminal justice process. The concept is “Restorative Justice” (FAMM - Families Against Mandatory Minimums. (07/2011) in which goals are set forth involving victim restitution, victim-offender mediation programs, community service, and conditions of probation. In conclusion the involvement of the victim has become an integrate part of the court system, in the sentencing and the rehabilitation of the