The Importance Of Freedom Of Religion

Improved Essays
The First Amendment, which guarantees the free exercise of religion, is a broad tenet which provides individuals with the inherent right to lead a life of faith and to act in a manner that faith prescribes and abstain from behaviors that faith prohibits. The freedom to live according to the dictates of one’s own conscience comes with the obligation to protect that freedom for oneself and all other individuals. Classical liberalism holds that individuals have inherent rights that are inalienable and derived from a source beyond nature and society, to his life, liberty, and property. Our Founding Fathers created the fundamental freedom of religion as a means to ensure religious liberty for all people and faiths, leaving the choice of faith in …show more content…
Religion, which creates harmony through peaceful coexistence, can be beneficial when individuals in society hold the same beliefs, but can be defective if people differ (Alzate 222). The freedom of religion, which consists of the choice to not practice a religion, creates this divide in society as the beliefs of those practicing a religion greatly contrast with those who do not practice a religion. If a community steers clear from religious principles, it can produce a political downfall of society as it creates a divide among the people (Alzate 227). This divide creates conflict between people’s beliefs and ideas as there is no framework by which people should follow. Conflict, as a result, prevents people from creating a religious society. When there is people acting in sinful nature or who are living based upon man made laws, it prevents people from creating a religious society that is grounded upon similar laws and standards (Henderson 55). By having the right to live while relying upon the conscience of the mind leads people to gratify the desires of the flesh and immerse themselves in evil conduct. Individuals believe they can distinguish between good and bad as God does; preserving religious doctrines, however, as oppose to people’s self-interests and desires, will establish a framework for moral behavior and …show more content…
Evil can be removed by society’s actions and the government’s actions as society and the government are the ones to influence the growth of evil (Brownson 229). When society or the government becomes more accepting of certain practices that are against the will of God, individuals begin to follow the majority of people and start to steer away from the principles that they believe in (God’s law) and gradually become more tolerant and accepting of what the majority is accepting of. Such influence from the majority results in confusion among people who are religious, as those of the majority disregard the standards or God driven laws, creating a distraction from the biblical foundations of this country. While many who are religious still sin, religion induces people to moral behavior when they see that others are attached to religion as well. When a government bases its principles on God’s law, it unites society together and encourages everyone to act similarly to those around them (Alzate 229). In a society which consists of a mixture of religious and secular people, those who are nonreligious are not following religious doctrines, but rather man made laws, causing people to act in immoral behavior, as principles they follow are according to their own desires and contrasting with God’s law. Individuals acting in good faith

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    By definition intolerance means to have an unwillingness ability to accept the views, beliefs, or behaviors that differ from one’s own. Christians can’t be wrong, they live a life of their own views; they live with spiritual thought. To accept a gay person into their home or an ex-murder into their home is beyond acceptable. Whether Christian’s believe in helping others or helping them thrive; they don’t help the ones who need it most. These people who claim to be true followers of Christ might actually be wrong, but instead of accepting this, they build a wall of intolerance.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difference between the religious and the atheist is that the atheist do not try to justify their morals with a religion. Religious people may view themselves as more moral than atheist because they may suffer from the just world phenomenon. They may view the world has ultimately being a just place; hence religious people will have more of a tendency to blame people for their lack of morality as a result of them not believing in a God. This all too well creates a divide between Atheism and religion. Atheists typically see religion as irrational as noted in the book, Riveted.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion Vs Constitution

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Moreover, these days’ people live in societies and hear immoral things about some religions, but should not religion be absolute right? Is not religion our path to God? People should sanctify their ideas not by using them for some goals because these ideas are the path to the…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    While Bayle’s argument is providing some convincing argument such as there are other motives other than passion which determines human behavior, there are other points can be hold opposed to Rousseau’s exclusion of atheists. Rousseau thinks, atheists cannot be a good citizens for the simple reason that someone who does not believe in life after death is unlikely to be willing to sacrifice his own life for the existence or the well-being of the state. Although, a religious person does not necessarily want to sacrifice himself or to kill others and may hold a position of conscientious objector. Since one of the dogmas of Rousseau’s civil religion is to accept the God, one can say that his or her life is given by God. Hence, it may be a duty for them to maintain their self-preservation and may not want to defend the state by taking God given lives of others’.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are also reasons why there is not happiness in the external goods in power. Finally, Aquinas rejects these objections by stating that God only uses his power for good whereas people can use it for good or evil. It does not make them happy. Also, ruling many people would be bad if they make bad use of their power. Finally, servitude is obstacle for good power and that is why people avoid it.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke points out that the church and its activities pertaining to religious practices is a voluntary thing that a person can choose to participate in. However, making the church and its practices, beliefs, and way of life the way of life through which the government re-enforces the case does not ideally lead man towards salvation in anyway, but more so show that those who have religious affiliations and power abuse their power in hypocritical ways that do not ideally even represent the Christian faith.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Conflict would see people use their religion as a weapon against those of different cultures and different beliefs. Many religions have a belief they are against, something to fight in opposition to. Recently, many religious people in the United States have let their personal beliefs cloud their actions, which attempt to try to use it to continue inequality and oppression it causes. In the article by Douglas Nejaime, he states, "some citizens may conclude that they cannot in good conscience participate in a same-sex ceremony, from priests and pastors to bakers and florists, argues the Heritage Foundation 's Ryan Anderson. The government should not force them to choose between their religious beliefs and their livelihood."…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we think of morality, many questions, such as “what is considered right ?”, and “what is considered wrong?”, come to mind. While many people believe that religion can help us answer these questions, others argue that morality is self- determining and should not relate to religion in any way. When morality and religion are put together, it causes conflicts because one person 's’ morals are not the same as another individuals. One person’s morals can be based off of one religion while others’ morals come from a separate religion, or in some cases, no religion at all. Thus, causing conflict because of all the different opinions on what is considered right and what is considered wrong.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If someone acts in a non-religious way, it is not an obvious implication that they are completely non-religious or that they are horrible people for not practicing their religion to the letter. Chaucer seems to dismiss this as silly, believing instead that it is the whole of their character that determines them as a person. Not only this, but he encourages them to go against certain parts of their religion in order…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of Religious pluralism is the belief that one can overcome religious differences between different religions and denominational conflicts within the same religion. The existence of religious pluralism depends on the existence of freedom of religion. Freedom of religion is when different religions of a particular region possess the same rights of worship and public expression. Freedom of religion is a fundamental human right that protects the conscience of all people. It allows us to think, express and act upon what we deeply believe.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays