Supreme Court's Defense Of Hobby Lobby

Decent Essays
The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Hobby Lobby’s defense of a woman’s right to choose what type of contraception they can use has taken the argument of religious freedom to another level. It has allowed businesses across the country to deny not only women their right to birth control, but it has also been used as a defense against providing services to LGBT Americans. It’s important to point out the difference between what a civil liberty is, which protects you against discrimination and what religious liberty is, which protects you from engaging in anything that opposed your faith.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Roe Vs Wade Research Paper

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Legislators across the country were moving to restrict abortion as they felt an obligation to preserve the pro-life nature of their respective states. However, many of these restrictions were struck down by the Supreme Court, including the statutes requiring parental and spousal consent as it was determined those restrictions were violations of the woman’s right to privacy. This trend of state restrictions being passed and judicial review striking them down continued throughout the Twentieth Century and on into the Twenty-First…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobby Lobby’s case argued that their right to religious freedom and beliefs were being violated. They also argued that obligating them to provide contraceptives to their employees violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). The RFRA was enacted in 1993 and requires that the government not hinder an individual’s freedom to exercise their religion unless “doing so is the least restrictive way to advance a compelling government interest” (The Economist 1-2). Hobby Lobby argued that obligating corporations to provide their employees with contraception was not the least restrictive way (NWLC…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 2012, Charlie Craig and David Mullins went to Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood,CO, and requested that its owner, Jack C.Phillips, design and create a cake for their wedding. Phillips refused to design the cake because of religious beliefs, he doesn’t create wedding cakes for the same sex wedding. The issue is that since Phillips declined to create the cake, Craig and David Mullins filed charges of discrimination with the Colorado Civil Rights Division; they formed a formal complaint with the office of Administrative Courts. On August 13, 2015, the Colorado court of appeals unanimously affirmed the commission’s order, finding that the bakery discriminated and violated the state law. The Colorado Supreme Court denied review while the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 26, 2017.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neil Noesen Case Summary

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 2002 Neil Noesen case, a woman in Wisconsin went to fill her prescription at a local K-Mart, only to be refused by the only pharmacist on duty at the time, Neil Noesen, because the aforementioned pharmacist was a strict Roman Catholic, and it would be against his principles to give someone contraceptives. In addition to this, he believed it would also be wrong to transfer the prescription so that it could be filled by someone else. The district manager knew Noesen would not dispense contraceptives, but was not aware that he wouldn’t at least transfer the prescription. In this situation, the issue revolves around the woman’s right to have access to birth control, and Noesen’s right to exercise his religious freedom.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis of Liberals Think that Only Liberals Can Boycott and Protest Ryan T. Anderson, a member of The Heritage Foundation, wrote an article regarding the hypocrisy of liberals and how religious freedom is under attack. The article, “Liberals Think that Only Liberals Can Boycott and Protest” begins with stereotypes and ad hominem by generalizing and attacking a group of people. He suggests that all liberals do not have standards. He uses a false analogy and emotional fallacies to support his claims. Anderson’s article has little evidence to support its claims and attempts to use an ethos appeal by arguing the United States’ religious freedoms are under attack by liberals and companies.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 2003, the court case Lawrence v. Texas, the Supreme Court ruled that state laws banning homosexual sodomy are unconstitutional as a violation of the right to privacy. The case began with the arrest of a man named John Geddes Lawrence, a Houston resident of Texas. Cops were dispatched to the apartment for some “weapon disturbance”. Instead of finding what they came for they caught Lawrence in a sexual activity with another a man known as Tyron Garner. They were later charged with violating the Texas “Homosexual Conduct Law”.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Only two federal district courts have taken the contrary view and, in doing so, neither actually analyzed case law from the Supreme Court that held that the First Amendment does provide a right to a religious exemption. While neither the Tenth Circuit nor any district court in any of the states that comprise the Tenth Circuit have addressed the issue, the issue appears to be well-settled within two circuits: compulsory vaccination laws do not violate the Free Exercise…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional for the State to place an undue burden on the exercise of a constitutionally protected right. Self-determination is constitutionally protected right, to which the Cruzan’s tried to carry out on their daughter’s behalf. Therefore, for the State of Missouri to make it additionally difficult to prove that Nancy’s wishes were against the becoming of a ‘vegetable’ is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Due Process…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Earlier this year, the Supreme Court in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, the court heard a case in which the plaintiffs argued that a ban on same sex marriage violated certain provisions of the 14th Amendment. The plaintiffs specifically argued that the ban violated the concept of protection of liberty. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that same-sex marriage is legal across all 50 states because they view marriage as a union of two people and not solely as a union of a man and a woman. Although it was a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court, the majority opinion stated that the 14th Amendment was being violated. The dissenting opinion on the other hand, focussed on several ideas.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964 regarding the issue of race affirms everyone’s right to equal protection, without discrimination, under the 14th amendment. The case of Roe v. Wade in the early 1970’s presents the issue of equal rights of women and shows how the 14th amendment also protects ones right of privacy under the Due Process Clause of the 14th amendment. The issue of sexuality in the case of Lawrence v. Texas sums up the important changes in the interpretation of the 14th amendment that were used to protect the equal rights, as well as the right of privacy and free choice of two homosexual men in Texas. All in all, these issues that led to differing interpretations of the 14th amendment eventually defined it’s meaning: to provide equal rights, rights of privacy, and the right of personal…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Engel Vs Vitale Summary

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Engel v. Vitale extends the reach of the Establishment Clause to include nondenominational and voluntary government supported religious activity. The concurrence expands the Clause further, contending that any kind of public promotion of religion, particularly fiscal support, breaks the Establishment Clause. This case sets a precedent forbidding almost all government-based religious…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Past events have proven that judges striking down laws have benefited the recent moral beliefs of our society; “Canada’s abortion regulation, legislative barriers to same sex marriage…” (Whyte, 1). This point is important because the striking down of these laws may or may not go against the judges own moral beliefs, but the judge ultimately makes decisions based on the moral beliefs of the community or…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to opposers of Roe v Wade, Roe is not only morally wrong, but is a “lawless power grab by the Supreme Court” that is “fundamentally hostile to core precepts of American government and citizenship.” If Roe v Wade were to be overturned, it would be a “glorious day of human liberty and freedom” (Alters 2012) because it would allow all Americans to work together to establish and revise policies of abortion governing their respective states. The overturning of Roe would also help to solidify that every American is entitled to basic human rights – the self-evident truth that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. And as creations/children of god, unborn beings shall also hold these…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the court ruled that Phillips had to bake a cake for Charlie and David, he did have his First Amendment rights violated. In the future, the court should consider a different ruling, such as a fine and allow people to run their business in a way that doesn’t violate the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, rather than forcing him to provide the service. My decision would support the reasoning that people can have their own beliefs under the First Amendment, as long as they do not violate the rights of another. My decision would not force Jack Phillips to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples unless he is making them for heterosexual couples; he has the decision to make wedding cakes for everyone, or for no one. This ruling supports that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act are…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burwell v, Hobby Lobby is a court case that resulted from an issue which addresses the necessity of closely held corporations supplying birth control to its employees. The argument of this case is regarding the mandatory requirement to supply coverage for birth control. Hobby Lobby feels the mandate will also cover birth control options that also includes the abortion pill. Hobby Lobby opposed to this idea and due to their religious beliefs. they believe that they should not be required to supply such coverage for birth control under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise Clause.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays