Peer Pressure In Stanley Milgram'sthe In The Asch

Improved Essays
According to Stanley Milgram there are various situational variables that can clarify such elevated amounts of a person being obedient. Ordinary people following the rules and what is asked of them in particular position they are in. For instance, in employment, even if they don’t believe in what is asked of them. Many people have found themselves doing things that are destructive and incompatible with fundamental standards of morality. Few people are weak in resisting authority and afraid to speak out about the hideous jobs they are asked to perform. The physical presence of an authority figure that is dominating and strong can easily convince some individual that this is part of their job description. Most people feel that obedience is the main ingredient to receiving merit for their jobs. Usually thinking of getting a promotion. When an authority figure can ask another person to inflict harm to another individual without having compassionate for the individual, is total obedience without being bias. The conclusion in this experiment is that many people are easily convince by their superiors that what is ask of them rather right or wrong is correct. The reason for these action are certain people are numb to taking responsibility for the wrong doing. …show more content…
The peer pressure plays an important part in others going with the program, if others are following the instruction then some individual just following along.Most people are too busy trying to fit in a group situation, not bringing notice to the fact they disagree with what the others agree upon. With that being said they keep their opinions to their self and not take a firm stand on their beliefs. The old saying goes “don’t rock the boat”. Truly convincing themselves that they are non-conformist enough to stand up to a group when they know they are right, but conformist enough to blend in with the rest of your

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s Obedience Study Milgram’s original motive for executing this ethics breaking experiment was to learn why the German people allowed the murder of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn as to how people can listen to authority and break their personal morals to follow someone that they believe to be control. During the Holocaust, Nazis led a massacre of millions of Jewish people without letting personal values, such as compassion, stop them from committing this crime. In a general perspective, Milgram wanted to understand the effect of authority and how far people would go to obey authority under extremely conflicting circumstances. If I were placed in this experiment under the teacher position,…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To be obedient to authority means to “take directive orders from an authority figure, obedience is practiced to avoid punishment or other unpleasant outcomes due to ignorance of the order”. Usually obedience is done out of fear or respect. Obedience to authority was shown when Luke was made to dig the hole and fill it back up again. When he hadn’t done it fast enough the captain would hit him continuously. Luke begged and pleaded for them to stop abusing him and that he would do whatever they told him and that he will never disobey them ever again.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Variations of his experiment have been conducted over many years and in other settings with similar findings. The effect of authority on obedience is striking. People obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative, even when acting against their own better judgment and desires. The vast majority of people will obey authority even when it overrides their own moral judgement. Their feelings of duty and personal emotion are separated, and responsibility shifts in the mind of the subordinate to that of the authority figure.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Dilemma of Obedience” from his book Obedience to Authority, Stanley Milgram claims that people choose to become obedient to authority even if their actions are not constant with their own moral or significance. He begins by describing the importance of obedience and how it is so powerful that it can overthrow a person’s demeanor and their values on life. In order to understand the effects of authority on others, such as the ones on the Jews in Nazi Germany, Milgram constructs an experiment in order to examine how much pain a regular person would inflict on another person because they were authorized to do so. This will create some sort of conflict between the authority and the subject’s upstanding imperatives against hurting others.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perils Of Obedience

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The movie A Few Good Men provides a perspective with which to view the issues of the defense of obedience to authority when following instructions from superiors. Stanley Milgram, author of “The Perils of Obedience,” and Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton, authors of “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience,” would likely argue that numerous factors other than intentional sadistic urges could cause a person to unnecessarily inflict violence on another human being. Both articles use psychological methods to examine the reasons a person would knowingly inflict pain on another human. Milgram’s article begins by explaining the dilemma of submission to authority and continues to describe his well-known experiment in its entirety (78-79).…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article "The Perils of Obedience” Stanley Milgram describes obedience as a basic element in the structure of social life and the effects it has on all communal living(Milgram 693). What if one is asked to be obedient to something that doesn’t aline with their personal morals? Milgram wanted to run an experiment to find this out. He simply wanted to know if the Nazis were acting out in pure evil or just simply following direct orders by a person who, they thought, was placed in a position of authority. In order to do this, he sets out to test how a normal person reacts when given violent orders by a person, who they believe are in a place of authority.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s social experiment was an experiment in which laypeople (all white and male) were asked to deliver shocks to actors at the instruction of a scientist. The actor would beg the participant to stop delivering shocks, but the scientist would continue to insist that they continue, relieving them of responsibility if the actor “died,” which it was heavily implied they would. The significant majority delivered what would have been a killing shock, to the surprise of many of the scientists working on it. It was found that a lot of humanity (or, at least, white males) had the capacity for murder if instructed to by the right people; there was a clear blind trust for authority figures. On July 17th, 2014, Eric Garner died from a cop’s…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dehumanization Human beings love to search for the meaning behind everything because once meaning is found, then justification and rationalization can be given. Genocide is a very complex term, but the act of genocide itself is unfathomable. People always want a reason for why presidents or dictators allow genocide to happen, and the only option that can make everything clear is that human evil must have developed. Although human evil provides an explanation, there is something true about human evil.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In a similar fashion, the experimenter in the Milgram experiment makes this idea concrete. Milgram states, “ [t]he essence of obedience is that a person comes to view himself as the instrument for carrying out another person’s wishes, and he therefore no longer regards himself as responsible for his actions” (87). By being obedient, a person can be taken advantage of by authority and in turn abandon their moral…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mind Tyrant Analysis

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, circumstantial factors created by the experiment established a faux authority where students viewed these actions as appropriate. “If Hitler asked you…” the “teacher,” influenced by authority, applied negative reinforcement by shocking the “learner” for each wrong answer. The study was originally conducted under the hypothesis that Germans have a character flaw to obey authority without question, “no matter what outrageous acts the authority commands.” The results showed that most human beings act uncharacteristically when endowed with circumstantial…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram was an American social psychologist, who was known for his obedience experiment performed in the 1960s at Yale University. Milgram’s idea on purposing his experiment first came from the hideous acts of WWII. Milgram examined how individuals had the tendency to obey higher authority, such as Hitler, and still contain harmful acts on others, just because they were ordered to do so. According to Milgram (1963) he also believed that in some situations, that human propensity to “obey is so deeply ingrained and powerful that it cancels out a person’s ability to behave morally, ethically or even sympathetically”(p.306). Overall from these investigations Milgram decided to implicate on obedience to authority.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, we will develop a definition of “group mind” in the light of articles such as “opinions and social pressure” by Solomon E. Asch, and “the follower problem” by David brooks. The definition of the group mind that we will develop from these articles will be used to analyze the story “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson. In this article, we will analyze and apply the definition of group mind developed and use it to analyze the story of Shirley Jackson, and use examples from the texts to further Introduction: According to Solomon E. Asch, group mind or thinking of a group of people have a profound effect on the thought procedure of an individual. Solomon says “That social influences shape every person’s practices, judgments and T,…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An experiment to test how far a person is willing to go in the name of obedience was conducted at Yale University. People are usually obedient to people with power or above them, therefore, in this experiment an administrator would tell the test subjects to shock the victim, who was obviously, an actor/someone in on the experiment. In this article the author, Stanley Milgram elaborates and describes the experiment. Like any other article out there, there are weakness along with strengths.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays