Israel Relationship Essay

Improved Essays
History of Israel Palestine Relationship and Negotiations:

A full timeline of Israel 's key events is contained in Appendix A. The country of Israel was established in 1947 when the UN voted to partition Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states, wish Jerusalem and Bethlehem to be controlled by the UN. In the following years, around 750,000 Palestinian Arabs fled or were expelled from Israel, and up to a million Jewish refugees from Arab countries and 250,000 holocaust survivors settle in Israel. There is historical dispute on the cause of the Palestinian exodus, some left voluntarily (mostly the wealthy avoiding conflict), others left in response to Arab leader 's calls to evacuate, and others left due to expulsion from Israeli government
…show more content…
When President Carter initially took office, discussions involved Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), the Soviet Union and the United States. It evolved into a bilateral negotiation between Israel and Egypt (Stein 1999). This was caused by the desire to reach an agreement, which led to the elimination of parties who were not willing to reach agreement. Sadaf set in motion the path to a bilateral agreement when he visited Jerusalem in November 1977 (Stein 1999). From Sadaf 's perspective, he lacked confidence that consensus between all Arab countries would be reached, and didn 't want an Arab coalition to give up Sinai as a concession. As we know from our studies, multi-lateral negotiations typically morph over time into bilateral ones as parties realize others ' objectives and form coalitions based on mutual motivation. In this negotiation, the natural order would have been for all Arab countries to join a coalition, and Sadaf did not want that to happen. Instead, he preferred to negotiate a bilateral agreement with Israel, with the US as a mediator. From Begin 's perspective, - By ending war with Egypt, Israel would remove the largest and most powerful Arab state from their coalition.(Eisenberg & Caplan,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Syria is one of Egypt allies under the leadership of Al-Assad they are becoming a serious threat for Israel also with Yordania. But after Six Days War there is a difference understanding about military force towards Arab Countries also Egypt and Syria. Because USA and Israel didn't think about their military capability to create a modern warfare against Israel. But after Six Days War Egypt also Syiria had a military cooperation with Soviet Union. Soviet Union send their weapon also military equipment for their allies and support them for this war.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How would it look to the international community and other states in the region if the United States could not even convince a strong ally to engage in peace negotiations. Secondly, Israel’s actions towards palestine contradict the democratic and humanitarian ideals the United States stands for. In his farewell address George Washington said, “Washington called for just and fair conduct in U.S. diplomacy with other nations, but also warned that the republic should avoid long-term animosity and or friendship with other countries, and to take care to avoid foreign influences in our politics.” (internal citation). Israel ignorance to the United States’s warnings undermines major key aspects to the United States’s foreign policy, which are built around humanitarian and spreading democracy. This could potentially cause the United States to lose some of its global power.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For example, the United Nations employed Resolution 242 which rejects the right for Israelis and Palestinians to forcefully and aggressively steal one another’s land. It also demands the restoration of territory lost by Palestinians during wars. The resolution attempted to push the Arabs and Israelis towards peacefully coexisting, nonetheless, it remains unsuccessful. Additionally, all Arab states except Libya gathered at the Beirut Summit of the Arab League to endorse a plan for peace. The peace initiative presented an end to the Arab-Israeli conflict by offering recognition of Israel and stabilized relations among Arab states in exchange for Israeli withdrawal from territories occupied since 1967.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secondarily, uniting people over a common enemy generally leads the people to a common goal: abolishing said enemy. By selling Israel as a threat, Nasser managed to unite the Egyptians and other Arab states (such as Syria) together to eliminate Israel. Despite all of Nasser’s efforts, Egypt still had a major problem: it had few resources, thus it had a restricted potential. Egypt’s best hope to surpass these limitations is to be the political heart of the Arab world. So, this became Nasser’s main goal…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since 1948 a brutal feud between Israel and Palestine broke out and since then has been a never ending chain of attacks towards one another. The hopeful outcome for both nations is complete control over the holy land , which was home to Palestinian muslims, but is slowly being divided and conquered by Israeli Jews. As said by president Barack Obama "The question, then, is what kind of future Israel will look forward to. And that brings me to the subject of peace." (n. pag.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The four neighboring states of Israel; Syria, Transjordan, Egypt and Iraq all declared war on the new Jewish state of Israel. The goal of the Arab states was to either halt Zionist expansion in that region or reverse the Zionist expansion. Both the Israel state and the Arab states did not truly know the strength of the opposite army, and thus did not understand the cost of war. In International Relations, the reason why many states fail at bargaining or fail at cooperating is because they lack information about the consequences or rewards. The Arab-Israel war should have been a war without any costs, and thus many people believed that Arab states would have won.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Camp David Accords since the 1978 signing did not help in the Middle East, as stated in a study of Israeli terrorist attacks in 2002. U.S. President, Jimmy Carter, wished to help with Middle Eastern peace but everything he tried did not help. To help with the Middle East crisis, he started by learning about the background of the conflicts in the Middle East. Once he knew a significant amount about the Israeli Palestinian Conflict, he decided to hold a summit in Camp David, Maryland…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Israeli-Palestinian conflict had been on and off for 100 years. After World War II, six million Jews were killed, and the remaining Jewish people wanted a country to call their own. As a result, they were granted part of Palestine, and this event was the major cause of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict today (“Guide: Why are Israel and the Palestinians fighting over Gaza”). In 1948,…

    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Considering the proposal, Israel agreed about the Sinai Peninsula while expressing different views about the West Bank and the Gaza. Following the disagreement, Sadat grew frustrated and expressed dissatisfaction as well as showing the want to cut all talks with Israel. Sensing a major conflict, Carter “decided to invite both Begin and Sadat to Camp David”, (Carter 45). This is significant because Carter wanted to prove the world that America was able to resolve conflicts through diplomacy rather than war. As he states, “My next act was almost one of desperation”, (Carter 45) Carter saw no other option than bringing the two faces; charismatic Sadat and conservative Begin to the same table.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Prime Minister Netanyahu made it clear that he was opposed to the Oslo accords. Not only did Netanyahu want to postpone the process for the time being he had an end goal of putting a complete stop to it all together (Lesch 2008). “Netanyahu himself repeatedly denounced the accord as a violation of the historic right of the Jewish people to the land of Israel and as a mortal danger to their security” (Fawcett, 2015). In the two and a half year span that Netanyahu was in power he tried to screw up the peace process at every opportunity he got. Prime Minister Netanyahu took advantage of the legally non-mandatory clause of the Oslo Accords.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics