Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics Analysis

Improved Essays
The nature of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, evaluates that all human action is a means towards pursuing an ultimate good, known as happiness. Happiness is deemed the ultimate ends of pursuing the good. I will explain how Aristotle’s argument for the the aims of human activity and the pursuit of human nature relates to the science of politics. Aristotle examines that not all actions are direct leads towards happiness, but are subordinate ends. An example given would be that “bridle making and the other arts concerned with the equipment of horses fall under the art of riding” (Pg. 1, Ch. 1). It is not an ultimate good, but instead a fraction of the overall.
Aristotle proposes that all human activities aim towards an end result of happiness,
…show more content…
It is described as “the most authoritative art...it legislates as to what we are to do and what we are to abstain from” (Pg. 2, Ch. 3) Its aim is towards providing men with the conditions to lead a life pursuing the good. The science of politics itself is not precise, because what is good for one person may differ from another. Therefore, a formulaic format of the good cannot be derived. Instead, the science provides an approximated outline of what the good contains. However, this can only be achieved through extensive knowledge and experience of the good before it can be applied. The end of politics is eliciting human goodness. The design of politics is made with the intention to guide men in attaining what is morally good. However, it moves beyond just improving the wellbeing of just one individual. It is seen as a superior good to improve the nation. Ethics, is a subset of politics that shares the same intention. It concerns the differences between what is noble and just. And accentuates that the highest good is to attain an end of happiness, and that an individual attains happiness through leading a virtuous life. Moral virtue is a mean between excess and deficiency, and virtuous acts require one to act consciously with a moral …show more content…
An example of this would be an individual that carries their purpose of welding with no intention for recognition, increase in wealth or gaining status. The second would be the function of an individual, and an individual identified as superior in that field. Such as a welder in comparison with one who is innately talented. Thirdly, would be to perform in life well, because it is the function of man. In cultivating one’s talent, they are progressing towards a well lived life. Lastly, would be that the function of the individual follows in accordance to virtue. In the case of the welder, the individual would fulfill their purpose by continuing their life in dedication to that activity. Because happiness does not come from momentary contentment, but is achieved through a continuation of pursuing it.
In distinguishing the functions in each of Aristotle’s arguments, it elicits the belief in man’s responsibility to further improve the self to attain a life enriched in goodness. In turn, this goodness then establishes a happy life. However, it is not proven that the ultimate ends lies within happiness. Instead, it is approximated that human life benefits from this. The science of politics promotes moral value, and is exercised with substantiating goodness in

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    If morality is defined as a demarcation between good and evil, then there must be something to say about the importance of valuing the goodness of one’s nation over its destruction. Having already established that Machiavelli makes decisions that favor the majority, one can conclude that his tactics are indirectly moral. Machiavelli consistently delivers his people the necessary resources in order for his civilization to flourish. It is not that Machiavelli completely disregards morality; he would be foolish to do so. Rather, he values the importance of success, which ultimately leads to goodness.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The presence of practical wisdom in this theory is vital to effectively explaining the proper way to live well. If Aristotle was able to outline the mean virtue in all the infinite situations that could possibly be encountered, individuals would not be living virtuously. Doing the right thing cannot be considered virtuous if it is not done in the right way or from the right disposition. This is because the proper function of a man is to reason well. Reasoning well builds the character of this man, allowing him to fulfill his purpose through excellent activity of the soul, thus reaching eudaimonia.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle states that moral virtues are not inherent sources of reason but can be influenced by reason to aid in the acquisition of happiness. Hobbes believes that moral virtues are dispositions that are influenced by reason to make men more inclined to avoid returning to a state of nature. Hobbes makes the most compelling arguments mainly due to his pragmatism and understanding of the nature of man. His argument against an objective good thoroughly debunks the pomposity of Aristotle 's argument for ultimate happiness and the contemplative life because it applies more broadly to mankind. It is true that we desire goods for other goods but that does not necessarily mean that our desire is, in turn, vain and empty; it simply means that we are ambitious creatures that remain hungry for new input.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics is the standards of right and wrong that advise what humans must do. Epicurus is one of the philosophers who taught about these ethics. Epicurus believed that the purpose of life was to attain pleasure. He believed that by attaining pleasure, one can live a good, happy life. Although this was his view on life, other philosophers such as his contemporary, Aristotle, had different views of what the purpose of life was.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Virtue Ethics

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The good of man is a working of the soul in the way of excellence in a complete life” (Aristotle). While Aristotle focuses on ultimate fulfillment, he rejects the notion of pleasure, honor, or wealth as virtuous. These qualities border on the side of vices and are not considered to place value with regards to happiness. Virtue ethics is an excellent guide to allow personality, cultural beliefs, and personal views be pertinent in moral decision making while still being fulfilled and flourishing as a good…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue ethics avoids this problem by beginning with the human nature. The central concept of virtue ethics is virtue, which is a human disposition or character traits that benefit the leader and/or benefits people he or she interacts with. This situation theory is well and good but how does a leader apply the nebulous nature of virtue to concrete reality, the answer is through the application of servant based objectivism. Objectivism was popularized by author Ayn Rand as a rationalist school. Rand argued that the primary focus of man 's free will is in the choice: 'to think or not to think ' and that through thinking a man could develop understanding of the world as it is though an objective view, this view would drive the foundaiton of an objectivisit ethic.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Another important distinction is that Aquinas believes, “Everything that acts does so for an end which possesses the quality of goodness” In comparison, Machiavelli, believes that humans are by nature self-centred. Aquinas places stress over the moral outlook and man’s relation to the creator, unlike Machiavelli’s argument for man, that contents the possibility of success without possessing traits of virtue, as long as one appears to possess them. However, in the words of Aquinas, only through acts of virtuous nature can we arrive at the culmination point; through piety we forge a path that leads to the attainment of happiness in the totality of human life, because God is pure and being therefore the only means of actualising our natural happiness. Thomistic ideology, in contrast to Machiavelli, explains to us that men are made in the image and likeness of God and on the humanity of Christ as the way to God , as highlighted by the reply to Obj. 2 Q…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue ethics is defined as a moral theory that puts an emphasis on virtue making it the central concern. Virtual ethics defines the character of man as to what exactly is morally correct or incorrect. In Lewis Vaughn’s “Doing Ethics” (P.139) he states that “a virtuous person would do or what moral exemplars such as Jesus or Buddha would do.” He also goes on to state that a virtuous person often is someone who chooses to live the good life, flourishes and chooses happiness (P.139). A virtuous ethical actions and response to a certain situation always leads back to their morals and who they are on the inside. It leads me to believe that someone who chooses to live their lives by being virtually ethic would question themselves “What would Jesus…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As philosophers, by contemplating the good they are also closest to the good. They 're happy because they know how to act in accordance with beliefs. They make true choices about the value and worth of their actions, thus resulting in happiness. Plato fought against “sophists” who claimed that there was no truth, only opinion, which is ruled by basic needs and desires rather than reason. Plato argued that it is through reason that we find the good.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle also considers the best good. This is that which is desired only for its’ own sake, and for the sake of which all other ends are desired (Kemerling). However, the good of humans cannot be determined through an exact science since this process begins with general principles and forms conclusions. From an ethical standpoint, to evaluate what is good, we must begin with moral judgements before general principles can be reached. Happiness, Aristotle argues, is a complete and sufficient good (Aristotle 's Ethics).…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays