Obedience And Disobedience Research Paper

Improved Essays
How to Teach Children the Art of Obedience and Disobedience
Since some social psychology professors proved a theory by several experiments, the theory has been accepted by the many social psychologists that human behavior can be markedly influenced and change by any situation, even though sometimes the changes of behaviors were not ethically right. Stanley Milgram, a professor of psychology at Yale University conducted a series of social psychology experiments to verify how ordinary German people could go along with and obey the cruel authority who perpetrated genocide at the World War II (McLeod 584-588). This experiment was composed of an experimenter and a teacher in the same room and a learner in the other separate room in Yale Interaction Laboratory. The teachers were the
…show more content…
The learner was a confederate who was strapped to a chair with electrodes, learned and answered a list of word pairs given him to learn, and received the electric shock, not really if he answered wrong on purpose. Most of the subjects kept this experiment, although the order of authority was atrocious. The results surprisingly corresponded to Milgram’s theory that ordinary people who would not commit a brutal act can change their behavior cruelly to obey the powerful authority. Milgram experimented with 18 different variations that were changes of location condition, touch proximity condition, social support condition, two teacher condition, uniform condition, and absent experimenter condition. The results from those variation studies showed the conditions that can increase or reduce subjects’ cruel choices as they obeyed or disobeyed the authority (McLeod 584-588). If so, who are capable to choose rightly their behaviors that are sometimes obeyed or sometimes disobeyed to authority, although people can be highly influenced by situations? Additionally, how can the children learn the art of obedience and disobedience

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s Obedience Study Milgram’s original motive for executing this ethics breaking experiment was to learn why the German people allowed the murder of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn as to how people can listen to authority and break their personal morals to follow someone that they believe to be control. During the Holocaust, Nazis led a massacre of millions of Jewish people without letting personal values, such as compassion, stop them from committing this crime. In a general perspective, Milgram wanted to understand the effect of authority and how far people would go to obey authority under extremely conflicting circumstances. If I were placed in this experiment under the teacher position,…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inspired by the horrific acts committed by thousands of seemingly “normal” individuals during the Holocaust, Stanley Milgram set out to discover the causes and triggers of unquestioning obedience. He inquired why so many people from uneventful backgrounds followed orders from the most tyrannical and prejudice leader ever facing this world. Basing his theory from that of a grade school friend and famous situationist—Philip Zimbardo—Milgram began to explore the possibility of a situation to force a person to act in opposition of their deepest values and morals. His curiosity resulted in the perpetually debated Milgram Obedience Experiments.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the articles, “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You” by Theodore Dalrymple and “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem” by Erich Fromm, the authors possess differing opinions on the ideology of obedience versus disobedience, but are similar on demonstrating the impact on human relationships, explaining the key role of judgement in actions of conformity, and implementing facts based on scientific experiments. Ultimately, Dalrymple has a more superior argument providing further evidence of... to definitively conclude each point. Theodore Dalrymple states in the article, "Just Do What the Pilot Tells You," that obedience to power is no greater than disobedience. Dalrymple's motivation for writing this article was to define that the act of obedience to authority is needed for a society to remain in balance (Dalrymple 121) .…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram Obedience Experiment, a series of experiments originating from July 1961, serves as one of the most significant and influential experiments done in history due to its investigation of the conflict between obligation and obedience to authority and personal morality. The experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram, an American social psychologist that primarily explored social behavior but is best known for the way he tackled the issue of the true power and influence of figures in authority after the Holocaust. Due to the shock of many at the discovery that human beings were capable of such horrible things during the Jewish genocide of World War II, the Milgram Experiment was conducted to identify exactly how the horrible acts of…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Obedience to authority is a huge impact on a person’s morality. To further extend this idea the question on why do people with strong values, principles, ethics challenge and go against their morals when faced with an authority figure needs to be asked.. Many ideas are produced when asked this question; the focus will be on the internal forces that push someone to do something they normally would not do. Fear, conformality, and other internal experiences such as responsibility among others fuel the obedience to authority and change the way a person behaves. Michael Shermer and Saul Mcleod both provide extensive information on the stimulus of the obedience.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perils Of Obedience

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The movie A Few Good Men provides a perspective with which to view the issues of the defense of obedience to authority when following instructions from superiors. Stanley Milgram, author of “The Perils of Obedience,” and Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton, authors of “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience,” would likely argue that numerous factors other than intentional sadistic urges could cause a person to unnecessarily inflict violence on another human being. Both articles use psychological methods to examine the reasons a person would knowingly inflict pain on another human. Milgram’s article begins by explaining the dilemma of submission to authority and continues to describe his well-known experiment in its entirety (78-79).…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people in our society have been taught, starting in their early years of life, that they should be obedient to those older than them or those placed in a position of authority. Being taught from a young age that disobeying will lead to harsh consequences. But what if one is asked to do something that doesn’t aline with their personal morals? Why is it that most people in society seem to act under compulsion when faced with things they don’t care to do? What makes it so hard for them to disobey in that moment?…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A central conflict in human society is a divide between obedience and autonomy. People are by nature, herd animals, with a need for the security of knowing their place in the world. In Erich Fromm’s essay, “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem,” states that by being obedient, we gain a measure of the power that we worship, be it the Church or the State or a charismatic leader, and we become strong. We become righteous. It frees us of thought and of the accusation of wrong-doing (Fromm 4).…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In a similar fashion, the experimenter in the Milgram experiment makes this idea concrete. Milgram states, “ [t]he essence of obedience is that a person comes to view himself as the instrument for carrying out another person’s wishes, and he therefore no longer regards himself as responsible for his actions” (87). By being obedient, a person can be taken advantage of by authority and in turn abandon their moral…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Extending beyond Milgram’s findings to those such as The Stanford Prison Experiment and the Asch Conformity experiment, we learn that the responses to authority expand outside of his original experiment and provides more examples…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The test proved that seemingly normal people are likely to follow orders given by a person of authority even to the extent of killing another because obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up. This experiment forced participant to either violate their conscience by obeying immoral demands or not. Milgram’s experiment recruited forty males to take part in the study of “learning” with a total of six hundred thirty-six participants in eighteen separate tests. The participants actually believed they were shocking a real person unaware that the learner was actually acting like being shocked.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, not all disobedience is a virtue. Anyone who only obeys is a slave, while those who only disobey are rebels; they do not act for their own principles. Rebellion is the same as obedience if it is unquestionably followed; people must have a logical thought process behind their actions. Fromm says that obedience is wrong when we go against our logical and moral beliefs by obeying. We should never obey as an act of submission, only as an act of affirmation to our own logic and beliefs.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Comparative Analysis of Ross and Nisbett’s “The Power of Situations” and Fromm’s “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem” Introduction Ross and Nisbett disagree with Fromm about the causes for obedience or disobedience to authority. It states in the introduction to “The Power of Situations”: “Erich Fromm conceives of obedience and disobedience as products of one’s character or of one’s moral choices” (627). This is suggesting that Fromm believes a person will obey or disobey based on their personality traits. He states: “All martyrs of religious faiths, of freedom, and of science have had to disobey those who wanted to muzzle them in order to obey their own consciences, the laws of humanity, and of reason” (623). People…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays