Nuclear Weapons Annotated Bibliography

Improved Essays
Annotated Bibliography: The Effects of Nuclear Weapons
History Channel.” Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. History.com. A&E Television Networks, LLC. N.d. Web. 26 Oct. 2016
Summarize: On August 6, 1945, America dropped the first nuclear bomb on Hiroshima Japan. It destroyed 90 percent of the city and killed 80,000 people. Another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, killing 40,000 people. Japan surrendered shortly after the bombs have dropped.
Assess: This source is useful because it gives an example of what happened in the past due to a bomb being dropped. This article comes from History.com, this source is somewhat credible because it is a historical channel, but it is not an organization or an educational website. This source is objective it is
…show more content…
When compared to the other source, this source explains some of the same information, but this one goes into specific detail on to what happens during a blast. This source is also extremely credible because it comes from the Encyclopedia Britannica, and this source will only give a researcher facts on their topic.
Reflect: This source is the main bread and butter of my topic: the effects of nuclear weapons, because it explains what exactly happens during the blast and the repercussions from a blast. It has not changed my opinion on the topic because it reaffirms what I already know, that nuclear weapons have the potential to destroy the world. This source can be used for the main information and quotes on to specifics like the energy radiated and what happens during a nuclear
…show more content…
There have been efforts in place to prevent these weapons from being used, the first being by the UN General Assembly in 1946. This created a commission that deals with nuclear weapons in a way to prevent them from being a danger to people and nature.
Assess: The United Nations is a reputable source because it goes over what nuclear weapons are. It also goes over what nuclear weapons are used for, and the efforts in place to keep nuclear weapons from being misused by the wrong people. The information is Objective, and it comes from a vetted source, the United Nations. There is no evidence of opinions in this article it is strictly factual. The article presents factual information such as, there is twenty-two thousand nuclear weapons in the world. There has also been two-thousand tests conducted since 1946 on these weapons.
Reflect: In a research paper about effects nuclear weapons, this article is highly useful and would be a good source to use because it is strictly factual and comes from a vetted source. I can use this source to explain what nuclear weapons are, and what efforts are in place to keep them from being misused. I can also use this source to cite facts like how many weapons are in the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Many people have their own views towards this. To me, the dropping of the bomb was a good thing on our part, because if our enemy got their hands on the supply we had, there 's no telling what would have happened. Germany was sabotaged for their vast supply of heavy water, which would have provided them with necessary equipment to build a bomb. Due to Adolf Hitler 's death and the attack on the heavy water plant, Germany was no harm to us. This proves to show what could have been done.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But no more viewpoint of this article what want to say. So this is not a completion article. I think if it definitely explained The Nuclear Option well or not for humans in the end, it is a perfect article. The article needed one more subject in the end. In general, it suggests important discussion points for the international community on military intervention and the impact of nuclear leak on the displacement of populations.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some skeptics argue that President Truman dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, which he knew was on the verge of defeat, to intimidate the Soviet Union in an already developing Cold War. Also, others believe that two atomic bombs weren’t necessary; instead, one was more than enough. However, facts prove that using the atomic bombs were the lesser of two evils. To prove such beliefs, I will use the six criteria for just war. The first criteria (legitimate authority) ensures that war isn’t waged for private ends, but for those of the majority.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Nukes

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    But of course, some people argue that a world with nuclear weapons would lead to World War 3. And if the last war was any indication, the US would need a tremendous one up against the enemy in order to prevail again. A big thing in the last World War though, was the unruly civilian deaths. But according to Stratfor Global Intelligence, low yield nuclear weapons exist and if the conflict comes to a stage of requiring nukes, these low yield weapons will solely hit the target and minimize civilian death. It would not be as fatal as Hiroshima.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 16 Works Cited

    Truman was informed on the atomic bomb mostly by James Byrnes, also known as "Mr. Atomic Bomb" (Jennings). Byrnes and General Groves had a big impact on the matter. They basically manipulated Truman into doing whatever they said because they knew everything there was to know about the atomic bomb and Hiroshima (Hunt,403). Henry Stimson was another figure involved. He along with Groves were the two who wrote the order for dropping the atomic bomb, even though Stimson was very cautious about it all (Jennings).…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 16 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dropping of the atomic bombs on japan by the US government on the 6th and 9th of august 1945 in Hiroshima and Nagasaki may not be seen as the right choice when ethically looking upon the situation that the united states was presented with at the time. Although the decisions of the US were not ethically justified, the circumstances in which they found them selves in made their actions appropriate in the sense of saving their counties name and regaining their power after the Pearl Harbor bombings that occurred on December 7th 1941. Dropping the bombs aloud the US to show the power they had and the potential they held, stating that were in fact a force to be reckoned with to the world. The US was obviously prompted by the Pearl Harbor bombings…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When we think about killing innocent people the first names that come up to us are Osama Bin Laden with 911 and Adolf Hitler in the holocaust; however there is one person that killed innocent people by sending an atomic bomb in 1945. This person is U.S. President Harry Truman, he tough that by sending the atomic bomb the war with Japan would stop. Throughout history people wonder if the decision that President Harry Truman was the right one. Harry Truman took a barbarous decision of sending an atomic bomb against two cities of japan, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing approximately thousands of innocent people. It all started with the Manhattan Project and with a desired to end war and protect the United States.…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cody Hill Mrs. Miller English 12A 20 March, 2016 The Atomic Bombing of Japan After forty-four months of increasingly brutal fighting between the Japanese and the Allies in the islands of the Pacific Ocean, an American B-29 bomber loaded with the most powerful weapon ever created by man, was headed for the city of Hiroshima. The crew was preparing to unleash the beast on an unsuspecting civilian and military population. The United States needed to do something drastic because Japan was not going to stop with their suicide bombing and threats to destroy the world. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was completely necessary to stop the Japanese and bring WWII to a close, despite the tragic outcome of the bombing. During the second world…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, an American B-29 bomber named the Enola Gay left the island of Tinian for Hiroshima, Japan. The uranium 235 gun-type bomb, named Little Boy, exploded at 8:16 a.m. In an instant 80,000 to 140,000 people were killed and 100,000 more were seriously injured. The blast wave shattered windows for a distance of ten miles and was felt as far away as 37 miles. Hiroshima had disappeared under a thick, churning foam of flames and smoke.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While there is the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) on mutually assured destruction (MAD) weapon as the result of international community to work on world peace and humanity justice, there is also a counter-argument on the necessary of MAD weapon such as nuclear weapon, which believes owning a nuclear weapon not only could protect one state itself, it also can promote peace, as no state could risk the possibility of destruction from the nuclear weapon. The justification of owning a nuclear weapon usually coined as the ‘nuclear deterrence strategy’ by the super powers. This assignment focuses on the nuclear deterrence strategy of United States (US), particularly its driven factors and development. In the later part, this assignment would also analyse the effectiveness of the strategy. 1.1 US’s Strategy of Nuclear Deterrence The concept of nuclear deterrence strategy is not a classical concept, it is rather new, approximately the idea came about after the World War II (WWII).…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics