Nietzsche's Distinction Between Good And Evil

Decent Essays
Nietzsche’s method begins with the doubt: is there a distinction between a thing and its meaning. The same things have different meaning at the different time, but people usually consume that it is all the same. He also shows the valuation “good and evil”, “good and bad”. To the noble, “good” is powerful and life-asserting. The “evil” is equal with what the noble calls it “good”. The weak is oppressed by the noble, but the noble still called that is “good”. They came themselves as good when they came to see the contrast between them and the weak. In first essay, Nietzsche introduces one of his best image, blonde breast. This mean to hold breast of prey is a mistake because this action is from their inherent strength, rather than any evil purpose.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He looks at empirical causes to explain the existence of morality in order to reason why it is the way it is. When analyzing his work, would seem like Nietzsche has a hollow concept of justice. What only every seems to be just is what the current laws that exists advocate for. There does not seems to be anything more or anything less to the statement. There is nothing grandeur to justice because the meaning can change just as easily as…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on one of Friedrich Nietzsche's most distinguished philosophy books ever written during the 18th century, he develops a new philosophical ideal. In the book "Beyond Good and Evil," Nietzsche inquires a philosophy of the future for "free spirits". Nietzsche describes the distinct species of a philosopher, the "free spirits" and contrasts dogmatism with the true free spirits. Through all of this, Conard argued that Bart Simpson was not Nietzsche's ideal while, on the contrary, Felder argues that Carrie Bradshaw embodies the ideals of Nietzsche's new brand of a philosopher. Conard argues that Bart Simpson does not resemble Nietzsche's ideal of the new brand of philosopher because Bart is the complete opposite of what Nietzsche envisioned.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We are unknown to ourselves, we knowers: and with good reason. We have never looked for ourselves – so how are we supposed to find ourselves?” begins Friedrich Nietzsche in the preface of his book, On the Genealogy of Morality (Nietzsche 3). In this statement, Nietzsche illustrates our lack of self-questioning and self-knowledge, criticizing man for treating the value of moral values “as given, as factual, beyond all questioning” (Nietzsche 8). He places the origin and development of our current altruistic morality at the foreground of his First Treatise, writing of a “priestly rebellion” that made man an “interesting animal” (Nietzsche 16).…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In his essays Beyond Good and Evil and On the Genealogy of Morality he discusses the shift in thinking in terms of “good and bad” to “good and evil.” Nietzsche goes on to discuss his idea of master-slave morality, which at its core is exactly what it appears to be. Initially, this formulation of morality was practiced by ancient aristocratic societies and followed the value equation of good = noble = powerful = beautiful = happy = beloved by God (Nietzsche, 81.) Breaking it down, master morality is both good and bad, where being “good” is to be happy and have wealth, power, or strength. On the contrast, being bad was the equivalent of being a slave, weak, sick, and pitied.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nietzsche's exploration of the different connotations of "good. Fist lests discusess what connotations are. Connotions, "are the associated or secondary meaning of a word or expression in addition to its explicit or primary meaning: A possible connotation of “home” is “a place of warmth, comfort, and affection.” After reading the three essays comprising The Genealogy of Morals I feel, "Nietzsche makes his approach clear early in the first essay, contrasting himself with certain "English philosophers," who Nietzsche feels are completely misguided in their explanation that from the very beginning, altruistic acts were praised as "good" by those who benefited from them." Nietzsche's works to me seems to feel that good is in the preception of…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill and Friedrich Nietzsche both analyzed the outlooks fostered by the ancients, Christianity and modern morality in regard to the qualities of character that each group developed. The two men held similar views regarding the Christians and modern morality believing that each was creating a herd like mentality where individualism was being suppressed. The two interestingly differed on their view of the ancients, where Nietzsche disagreed with their rationality, Mill praised their individualism. For starters, Nietzsche viewed the character that each society developed in the context of whether or not they fostered the will to power. Will to power for Nietzsche was the driving force of man, and he believed that any hindrance or alteration…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The aphorism also presents that the enhancements in man came from the domination of barbarians over that of more peaceful, civilized people. Nietzsche says, “…barbarians…predatory men still in possession of an unbroken power of the will and a desire for power, threw themselves on weaker, more civilized, more peaceful…cultures, in which at that very moment the final forces of life were flaring up in a dazzling fireworks display of spirit and corruption. This quotation is giving the implication that current society is a result of such actions, but it comes into full fruition in the following sentence, “At the start the noble caste has always been the barbarian…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche started this section talking about punishment and says that punishment was a way for creditors to receive reimbursement for the debts which they can’t get back. “an equivalence is provided by the creditor’s receiving, in place of a literal compensation for an injury (thus in place of money, land, possessions of any kind), a recompense in the form of a kind of pleasure – the pleasure of being allowed to vent his power freely upon one who is powerless”(Sect. 5, pp. 64–65) , If the debtor fails to pay, the creditor will substitute for something else that he owns for example: his freedom, or his wife..…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He finds such a mediocrity in modern scholarship, which is overly concerned with digging up dry, dull facts. Nietzsche's ideal philosopher creates meaning and values and does not simply deal with empty facts. Nietzsche begins with the approach that our knowledge is based on a simplification of the truth that makes it expressible in language and understandable to all. Primarily, then, our inclination to knowledge is constructed upon and is even a clarification of, our inclination to stupidity.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When we first meet him, Emil hardly seems like much of a hero, much less a Knight of Ratatosk: he's quiet, timid to the point of frustration (on Richter's end, at least), and incredibly submissive-- which is understandable, given his background. Due to the fact that monsters suddenly started appearing around Luin when he arrived, many of the townspeople there call him a monster and fear and/or shun him; Emil himself says nothing to contradict them and simply allows them to treat him badly because he's too frightened to stand up for himself. Even his aunt and uncle constantly berate him and tell him how things would be so much better if they'd never taken him in. As a result, Emil has learned that keeping his head down, staying quiet, and apologizing for everything (even when it's not his fault) is the best way to get other people to leave him alone. He's resigned himself to not having any friends not because he doesn't want any, but because he just feels that no one would want to be friends with someone like him.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That poor, poor Frankenstein’s monster, always so misunderstood. From the moment of its birth, When Dr. Frankenstein declares, “It’s alive!,” the creature is always referred to as something less than human. It goes from being called a creation to a creature to a monster and finally a murderer, but never is it called a “he” or even a man. But really, how could it have been? The creature’s outward appearance was nothing less than monstrous.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A prime example of what Nietzsche’s arguments and metaphors are referring to is mankind’s concept of time. There is always debate on whether time is a construct by humanity for the sake of convenience or if time is something that exists outside of our own personal perception of it. Like his concept of declaring something a mammal as bringing a truth to a limited light, we have declared time as something we can measure and perceive intelligently, however, we will likely never understand the true nature and behavior of time, so the only thing mankind can do is mold what we can perceive into something that can be presented as a truth, however false or illusory it may be. It is a direct result of man’s insatiable desire for knowledge. If we concede to the fact that we may not be able to understand time, thinkers and philosophers would be disgusted at such an outcome and thus, create their own theories on the properties of time (which is something that already happens anyway, perhaps because of the fact that we are able to see that time is still something shrouded in false-truth despite being told otherwise by the majority.)…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the line between good and evil is blurred as a result of acts of cruelty. Victor Frankenstein played God, and yet, abandoned his creature. His inhumanity shaped his creation and bred their mutual suffering. Their fate is sealed from the very first act of cruelty: as it is the true creator of monsters. Yet, there is no clear-cut victim or perpetrator between the two main characters.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Xun Zi said that, “Human nature is evil, and goodness is caused by intentional activity”. Macbeth displays the tendencies of human nature to be evil as well as the ways in which it attempts to be good. The author and playwright William Shakespeare, also uses character foil to show the extreme differences in morals, ambition, and the tendencies of human nature. The characters Macbeth and Banquo personify the ambiguity of good and evil. They are both portrayed as ambitious men, but as the play progresses only one is consumed by his ambition and the temptations of power.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Good and Evil The separation of good and evil has been argued about for as long as humankind can remember. To truly be good, a person would have to know the difference between the two. In my opinion, good behavior is being kind, considerate, and fair. Evil behavior, in the other hand is when someone uses wickedness, selfishness, or greed to affect others.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays