Mary Wollstonecraft argues that myths such as the Fall and Prometheus are designed ‘to persuade us that we are naturally inclined to evil’. Discuss this claim in relation to two texts from the course. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Angela Carter’s ‘The Bloody Chamber’ both discuss the nature of evil and whether or not ‘we are naturally inclined’ to it. These two texts both agree and disagree with Mary Wollstonecraft’s claim in various ways. The following essay will explore how these texts discuss the claim that ‘we are naturally inclined to evil’.…
In her interesting yet morally questionable novel – Frankenstein – Mary Shelly employs an appropriate amount of ambiguity in the characters’ thoughts and actions to create a significant connection between the characters of the novel and the readers’ of the novel, which in turn would most plausibly cause the reader to condone the many ethical and social evils that may otherwise cause concern. Therefore, it would be apt to address Victor Frankenstein, the creator of the supposedly evil creature, as the morally ambiguous character in the novel because this characteristic of his can be substantiated by analyzing his immense obsession with natural philosophy, his egotistical personality, and his atrocious treatment of his own creation.…
The character Frankenstein happens to be very well-known in today’s media. Mary Shelley’s novel and story itself seems to be overlooked when it comes to who the monster is. When most think of Frankenstein, it’s a green giant who resembles the look of a zombie. Most probably wouldn’t know that they’re wrong in several ways. In comparison of the book to modern media, Frankenstein has seen some constant behavior, some similarities, and some differences.…
Frankenstein’s neglection of his creature badgers him and his loved ones. Just as a child follows the example of his or her parents, the creature knew only of the neglection of his creator and father. The creature was never shown love or acceptance and yet was expected to function as a member of society. Frankenstein abandons his creation, his child, his responsibility,and turns it into a monster both physically and mentally. Victor resented and feared his greatest work based on its appearance.…
In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the two principle characters, Frankenstein and the animal are both looking for equity. This equity wouldn't have been important if not for the formation of the creature. The physical appearance of the beast is the fundamental driver of its own enormity and other individuals' disdain of it. Frankenstein's equity originates from the acknowledgment that the creature has executed the greater part of Victor's family. Different individuals from his family feel the anguish of the current passings, yet none so firmly as Victor, "I, not in deed, but rather in actuality, was the genuine killer.…
I argue that The Monster emerges from the darkness of the souls of the residents of Whilomville. After his heroic action, Henry Johnson lost everything: his identity, friends and popularity, he became “the monster”, “the dark figure” (28), “the devil” (32). (Which is, as defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary, the most powerful evil spirit in Christianity), even a dragon. All of these connotations are associated with darkness, immorality, something that can be reflected in several residents of the town.…
As the differences, and sometimes similarities, between the two characters and actions of the creature are revealed to readers are introduced to Victor Frankenstein’s understated traits. Bringing out Frankenstein’s traits is the creation of the “monster”. First, it shows the scientific and humanistic mind of Victor…
Shelley instructs how to avoid dehumanization when she reminds the audience to consider each and every person’s larger life journey. Shelley is corroborating the age-old adage that one must not judge another until they have walked a mile in their shoes. Frankenstein is a story of a person who is “monster” in appearance, and another who is monster in his thoughts and actions. As members of society, it is our responsibility to decide which “monster” is the real…
In the exposition of the hair-raising novel Dracula by Bram Stoker, Jonathan Harker, an English lawyer, travels to a mysterious and unknown place by the name of Transylvania. He helps a nobleman by the name of Count Dracula who wishes to purchase a house in England. Upon arrival, Harker’s suspicion about Count grows and soon comes to the realization that he is in fact a vampire. Dracula does not wish to move to London for the house but instead he has the desire to drink the blood of English people. Next up in the inciting incident, Harker escapes from Dracula’s castle and manages to flee without being killed.…
Shelly’s acclaimed novel “Frankenstein” tells the story of a man who tries to create a new species, or master species without any female involvement. Through the creation of this character, Victor realizes that he has created a monster, and works throughout the novel to try to extinguish this being, but is ultimately unsuccessful in his goal. Throughout the story, the character of the monster parallels the character of his creator as they are related to each other in terms of their thirst for knowledge and their inability to love and learn at the same time. They are both hurt by the force of nature, as Victor is hurt by nature and bad luck throughout the novel, as it is realized that nature plays an extremely important part in the creation…
Dr. Victor Frankenstein is the real Monster in Mary Shelley 's Gothic Novel Frankenstein? At first glance, the answer to this question seems quite simple but in fact; it is not. Like an onion, Frankenstein has many layers. This essay will peel away the many layers to determine who the real monster in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Some of the points this piece will touch upon will be Victor’s desire for admiration by his colleagues, his quest to animate a deceased human being that would allow him to find the answer to immortality, and how his self-imposed isolation causes his family and friends great sadness and worry.…
Frankenstein knows that his work and research would not be accepted in his society. He also suspects that his work is wrong. “Who shall conceive the horrors of my secret toils?” But even after all the scientific research that he has done, his results are unsatisfactory to his needs. He calls his creation a “catastrophe” and a “monster”.…
Upon creating the monster, Frankenstein’s intention was to create a profound new species that “…would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me (Shelley 30.)” However, when Frankenstein brings the monster to life with the use of electricity and different body parts sewn together, he is immediately horrified at the “ugliness” of his work. In Victor’s eyes, the creation is not the embodiment of these ‘excellent natures’ at all and he is certainly not fond of the idea of being the reason for its creation. The creation’s “yellow skin scarcely covered the work of muscles and arteries beneath; his hair was of a lustrous black, and flowing; his teeth of pearly whiteness; but these luxuriances only formed a more horrid contrast with his watery eyes, that seemed almost of the same colour as the dun-white sockets in which they were set, his shriveled complexion and straight black lips” (Shelley 44).…
Yet since Frankenstein never accepts his monster, while his monster gives man an unbiased chance at redemption, the doctor makes his name as the man-monster, while his creature’s preferred path in life is that of a good- natured monster-man…
Dr. Frankenstein’s obsession with proving his superior intelligence leads him to violate the laws of nature, and create the creature. When Dr. Frankenstein discovers the secret of life, he is delighted because he thinks he has become “greater than his nature will allow” (43); he enjoys having this “god like” ability. At first, he hesitates with his project of creating life, but he cannot control his desire for success so he begins to create a creature. He states, “I doubted at first whether I should attempt the creation of a being like myself … but my imagination was too exalted by my first success to permit me to doubt of my ability to give life to an animal as complex and wonderful as man” (42). Because Dr. Frankenstein is such a young scientist,…