Both writers share that the notion that the right to punish is one of power. Foucault’s works also served as an extension to Nietzsche’s origination story. It is easy to note the radical shift in societal role. Nietzsche ends his account much with a tacit acceptance of the public nature of punishment, but Foucault depicts a shift to the more insidious. The great penal power becomes hidden out of sight, and micropenality takes its place. Although less cruel, the punishments and surveillance become constant factors. Finally, both similarly see punishment as a method to form habits in a
Both writers share that the notion that the right to punish is one of power. Foucault’s works also served as an extension to Nietzsche’s origination story. It is easy to note the radical shift in societal role. Nietzsche ends his account much with a tacit acceptance of the public nature of punishment, but Foucault depicts a shift to the more insidious. The great penal power becomes hidden out of sight, and micropenality takes its place. Although less cruel, the punishments and surveillance become constant factors. Finally, both similarly see punishment as a method to form habits in a