Pros And Cons Of Capitalism

Superior Essays
Can capitalism be just? Capitalism does it work and is it just? In the world of today we live in a capitalist system. However, there are some who oppose this system, and some who favor it. Others claim it is unjust to the working class, and others accept its outcome. The main question that will be discussed is whether capitalism can be just, and is socialism better. Capitalism is defined as an economic and political system in which a country 's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. Capitalism is a free market where the people can sell, and trade without having external interference. In theory, it all sounds great, but in practice it doesn’t always turn out that well. Milton Friedman debates the pros and cons about capitalism. He states that monopolies can arise and inhibit effective freedoms from a capitalist system. However, he goes on by saying “government is essential for determining the rules of the game …show more content…
Jerry Muller talks about how inequality is increasing in a capitalism system due, to the bourgeoisie ruling the free market (Muller). Although, it creates a strong and advanced market it can create inequalities for the working class. However, he goes on by saying that the people have the power to elect the government officials to help address the problem. A capitalist democracy system can help solve these inequalities, but it is up to the people to fix it. As we have discussed there are several negative affects about capitalism, but is socialism better? In Hoffman and Graham’s book “Socialism” we find that socialist tend to have a utopian view of society (216). Which in theory sounds appealing, but in practice it fails to play out. The idea that one can create a perfectly equal society sounds interesting, but realistically impossible. Socialism tends to aim on making everyone equal giving them equal respect. What can be the outcome of such

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Further, he does not deny the plausibility of communism if it were administered gradually and on a small scale (Mill275-279). A pivotal point of Mill’s perspective on private property is that personal ownership of land is what stimulates capitalist competition (Mill 253). This competition leads to lower prices of commodities, which actually leaves more surplus to pay wages of workers (Mill 253). This is a divergence from the Marx perspective that competition actually increases worker suffering. Furthermore, Mill is willing to admit that capitalism can at times depress wages, but he qualifies that remark by espousing that all wage declines mirror market fluctuations but competition will eventually revamp workers’ wages (Mill 249, 256).…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is because capitalism creates expansive gaps between the rich and the poor, as well as the highest class and the lowest class. Capitalist societies make it extremely difficult for the poorer and low class individuals to reach even middle class, and a socialistic society would benefit the mass of the population by distributing wealth and property equally and teaching people to care about more than their own…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason for this because in the eyes of Marshall social rights provide on access to some level of economic welfare. In a capitalist society one is guaranteed the ability to pursue economic success but it does not guarantee it. One may say that it is impossible to guarantee economic prosperity in any political system. However, even though in a capitalistic society one is guaranteed certain civil rights these rights do not always lead to social rights. The reason for this is because in a capitalist society one is an individual will the right to pursue one’s goals.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Occupy Wall Street movement can be analyzed through the lens of Karl Marx and David Harvey. Harvey critiques the idea of self-regulating markets, or neoliberalism, because not everyone has an equal opportunity in the market and without any state intervention it becomes unfair to those stuck at the bottom. Marx writes about the class struggles between the proletariat and the bourgeois. The bourgeois have purchased the labor of the proletariat at a minimal price and therefore have alienated the proletariat from their own work, but they have also given the proletariat the knowledge of how to work the means of production, so Marx predicted a social revolution would happen where the proletariat will gain power. Well, that did not happen, but…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whilst communism and capitalism are the economic systems in one point, the main difference is the control of production instruments; whether to have collective ownership or private property. In capitalism, owning the instruments of production is free, but it is also very difficult to maintain this ownership because of the constraints to generate revenue in the perfect competition. Whereas production instruments are shared equally in the communist system, so each individual has the right to use common goods and services. Of course, it is not clear the level of sharing equally. Briefly, communism calls for an economic order of sharing the ownership.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism was known as a conflict theory because of the society struggles between the rich and the poor. He believed there to be a way to construct an equal society, and getting the best out of everyone. The opposite of of the system Marx was aiming for was capitalism. Capitalism is the society we live in today, where corporations are owned by the owners. Therefore, capitalism treats people unequally.…

    • 1629 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    If firms preferred liquidity over long term investment, this then shows how insufficient demand reveals the vulnerability of Say’s Law. 3. Karl Marx’s theories of capitalism most intrigued me because he dissects Adam Smith’s theory for capitalism and presented the several contradictions of capitalism. He came from a different time period than Smith; he saw the class struggles and the capitalist society setting as something that is not ideal. Even though the standard of living increased thanks to capitalism, Marx witnessed laborers always tried to make ends meet.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    High liberals may claim that any system with thick economic liberty has potential problems, such as market failure or exploitation of workers. However, market democracy still provides for governmental regulation to step in when market failure occurs. Even though market democracy allows for smaller governmental bodies than most high liberals are probably comfortable with, market democracy recognizes the need for “basic protection” for “highly valued” facets of society, such as governmental intervention if workers’ hours become too long or strenuous. On the other side, libertarians may claim that any system with governmental regulation infringes on paramount economic liberty. However, market democracy’s use of regulation does not infringe on personal economic liberty; rather, it asserts that…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Harvey asserts that neoliberalism and the neoliberal idea of freedom were not a simple utopian project of intellectuals but rather a political project that helps elites to regain the power they somehow lost in the regulated. Therefore, the meaning and importance they devoted to liberty as a conceptual apparatus helped them to construct the consent of the society for the changes they asked for. Hayek, with referring Polanyi, claims that freedom is not a good thing necessarily. There are good and bad freedoms and neoliberal thinking made bad ones superior to good ones for the sake of capitalists. And in most of the advanced capitalist societies, the meaning freedom is what neoliberalism gave it nowadays.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argued that production forces people to exchange good and services, not individuals. Economic relations are beyond the individual in the sense that they grow and change separate to the interconnections of individuals, And these relationships have power over the individual. Individuals aren’t independents, they just appear so when separated from society. But, as Marx states, they can’t be separated from society because in capitalism, social classes shaped the individual and how they interacted with production and each other. Much like liberal democracy, Marx believed that individual rights were harmful to the proletariat because they favored the landowning bourgeoisie over the proletariat.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays