The Most Terrifying Video You Ll Ever See By Greg Craven

Good Essays
The video “The Most Terrifying Video you’ll Ever See” by Greg Craven is a video that discusses whether there should be significant action taken on climate change. Craven addresses one of the main problems with the climate change debate, which is that it has become a long bitter argument about whether climate change is real and if it is caused by human development. He is arguing that it doesn’t matter if climate change is real or not, significant action should be taken to further prevent or combat climate change because when faced with uncertainty about the future taking action is the only reasonable choice. I disagree with Craven because there should be a greater focus on information and facts when it comes to making a decision about climate …show more content…
From his hyperbolic title to only equating the extremes of action and inaction of climate change bait people into clicking on his video and sharing it. It also serves to make his argument more urgent. By beginning the video with the question, “what’s the worst that could happen?” he leads the audience through his argument and to the conclusion he makes. The worst thing that could happen, according to Craven, are environmental, political, social, public health and economic global impacts caused by inaction on climate change. He also says at the beginning of his video that the world may not recover from the “worst” thing that may happen to us. Craven also makes his argument to appear as if it will easily cater to anyone, from “the most hardened skeptic to the most panicked activist” (1:06). He uses a gambling metaphor by rhetorically giving the audience a choice in the form of two lottery tickets. Lottery ticket A will be significant action for climate change and lottery ticket B is inaction. When Lottery ticket A is chosen then we take the risk of a global depression in exchange for taking significant action against climate change, with B we risk “the end of the world as we know it” (2:53). Which is how he leads the audience to his conclusion that is does not matter is climate change is real or not there still should be significant action taken. With the given information, which are only the extreme …show more content…
Craven oversimplifies the issue, and although it may have been deliberate in order to make is argument seem more crucial, by only discussing the extreme cases he misses other factors that should be considered. We cannot fully consider the risks unless we actually know what we are risking. When Craven is discussing what taking action will be like he only discusses the cost. Although significant action may be costly there are also other factors to consider, like how significant action for climate change will affect our daily lives. In the essay “Science says revolt!” by Naomi Klein the significant action for climate change that she is calling for is revolutionary because in her perspective global capitalism is the root of the climate change problem. The dismantling of capitalism would be destructive to the world that we know now. Without knowing what significant action that Craven is calling for, other than just some action towards combating climate change, it is impossible to make and educated and well informed decision about it. Oversimplifying a complicated issue in order to make a decision about should not be the way in which we solve it, so discussing climate change in the terms of risks and risk management is just not feasible without knowing what kind of actions that would be taken. Decisions should not be made by guessing what our

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Conservatives would believe that the Paris accords is a waste of time and that there are more important issues in the world, like terrorism. In contrast, this article showcases the benefits of this climate change agreement helping the planet, proving it is liberal biased. This article will influence its readers to believe the Paris accords is beneficial to society. However, this agreement will mark a transition in global financial markets by “triggering a fundamental shift away from investment in coal, oil and gas as primary energy sources toward…

    • 1276 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Rolling Stone’s 2012 article “Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math”, Bill McKibben provides a call to action to the developing climate crisis we have been and will continue to be facing. McKibben emphasized climate change as a fight we need to take action on, stating “ we’re losing the fight, badly and quickly- losing it because, most of all, we remain in denial about the peril that human civilization is in.” (McKibben, 103) For much of the article, McKibben develops the claim that climate change is the result of many companies greed problems, and argues that we must sever ties with those who profit from climate change now. McKibben builds his argument around three numbers, 2 (degrees celsius), 565 (gigatons of CO2), 2795 (gigatons of…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Global warming is still considered a controversial topic in modern politics. More people believe that global warming is real but aren 't worried about the immediate threat it imposes. Conservatives believe that changes in global temperature is naturally proven by examples like the Ice Age. They believe that there is no evidence that human beings are causing climate change. Liberals, however, believe the opposite.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since global warming has unreliable data to prove that the earth is heating up, people realize that could be political and mediated hoax. This shows when people are only exposed to one side or the other and then giving both in an non-bias way, they can decide truly for…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For reasons of fairness, this needs to be taken into account during negotiations. In turn, we would certainly see a more willing attitude towards binding contracts stemming from developed countries. The problem of conflicting interests and motives was another obstacle we looked into alongside the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. We noted that the threat of climate change is not credible enough to deter actors from free-riding. Extensive cooperation is necessary in order to reduce climate change.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lee (2009) does not give much hope in his article beyond saying, “For starters, we should redouble our efforts to slow down global warming and undo the damage humanity has already done to the environment. Every little bit helps, so by all means, hassle your senator and recycle those bottles” (pg. 473). While not all that informative, this quote shows the Lee still believes Earth’s future can be bright if behavioral changes are made now. Sheeran and Lubber’s (2009) article mainly focuses on refuting false claims made by another author but in the process they share ideas on how to enact…

    • 1765 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Geoengineering Solutions

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Correspondingly, a vast number of people may question these comparative solutions, as with every claim and resolution comes doubts and investigative concerns. Some may argue that geoengineering is always dangerous, but experts suggest that certain solutions of clean and gradual processes may ultimately pose little harm. The harmful geoengineering methods seem to consequently contribute to global warming. On the other hand, the positive aspects of geoengineering seek “to prevent CO2 from building up in the atmosphere,” and fundamentally hinder the effects of anthropogenic climate change (Alley, Mann). Moreover, any technological application toward this effort cannot simply fix the climate change, there is no such thing as a true quick fix.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Global Climate Pessimism

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Another small reason for hope is that as global awareness of anthropogenic global warming gains traction, governments will be more inclined to follow through with climate change agreements due to the pressure placed on them by their own populations. Unfortunately, the Montreal Protocol was only one success of many similar failures, and the time it might take for populations to pressure their governments to act for the future might, very well, be beyond the point of no return for global warming. The alarming truth about global warming is that the odds are stacked strongly against us in many ways. Gardener pegged the problem as a “Perfect Moral Storm.” As he put it, it is the convergence of three “storms” or dilemmas. I would like to start with the “Spatial Storm.”…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    CREDIBILITY : I did an assignment about two different thoughts between two environmentalist : Al Gore and Botkins. Al Gore, with the article “The time to act is now”, informed to the reader how bad global warming is and alerted them the need to react now . Botkins with the article “Global Warming Delusions” said that global warming is not a very serious problem and we don’t need to waste money on this problem . I have looked for much research to answer the question by myself as to whether global warming impacts seriously on our life or not and what we can do to protect our living environment. That’s why today I am very interested to share with you some basic information about global warming.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Collective Action

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This relates to the issue of global warming in that the world is slowly being degraded due to pollution, over usage for production, and other issues, all of which are factors of climate change. Hardin proposes a solution for this problem with the idea of “mutual coercion mutually agreed upon,” which requires people to work out a solution that may force them to give up privileges now in order to benefit in the long run (Hardin, 1968). However, due to the fact that the most optimal condition in this situation would be equilibrium, none of the actors are motivated to change their behavior (Ostrom, 2014). Even if a group of people decides to alter their choices, there may be “free-riders,” or people who do not follow the set guidelines and instead reap the…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics