Modular Human Ability

Superior Essays
Modular Humanity: An Inquiry into Bioethics and Human Ability
A reality where a person can swap out every part of their body, from their heart to their fingertips, for high performance electrical parts might arrive in several years as research into biotechnology turns average people into super-humans. Biotechnology and bionics involve humans and electronics assimilating in ways that are beneficial to the person receiving the upgrade. These new forms of treatment currently consist of speculation and basic applications; however, certain precautions must be taken to maintain ethics and fairness when these technologies emerge in real life. Biotechnology can exist in many forms, such as prosthetics, bionic eyes, and even gene editing. Biotechnology
…show more content…
The definition of disability, “a physical or mental handicap, especially one that prevents a person from living a full, normal life or from holding a gainful job.” (Disability), will need to be considered to prevent abuse of biotechnology. Biotech augmentations may provide certain people with advantages causing wealthy “[communities] of ‘super beings’ who are, literally, better, stronger, faster” (The Guardian), to form if the distribution of such upgrades is not limited to “[normalization of the] … pathological, morbid, [disorganized], and dysfunctional’’ (qtd. in Fitzsimons 4). As with any new medical technology “tech and pharma companies stand to make millions” (The Guardian), which is why “Western governments [should] impose regulatory restrictions”(Fitzsimons 2), to prevent unfair pricing . Patents and other forms of bureaucracy may make it difficult for people to obtain the accommodation that they need. A system of determining qualification will be necessary for distribution of such enhancements. In the future, biotechnology may need to be regulated as healthcare is today; it must be available to everyone in basic forms and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Gene Patent Michael Crichton in “Patenting Life” and John E. Calfee in “Decoding the Use of Gene Patent” discuss gene patent. Both agree that gene patent is overpriced, and research companies shouldn’t have the right to own patient’s tissues, but they disagree about the harmful of gene patents. Crichton and Calfee agree that the testing for different types of diseases are expensive. They also agree that no other companies are allowed to test because patent holders block any competitor's test. Crichton believes that it can be harmful because gene patent doesn’t allow other manufacturer to personalized suited to our particular body make up.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author of “When is it O.K. to Replace Human Limbs With Technology?”,Daniel E. Slotnik, and the author of “A Once-Unthinkable Choice for Amputees,” Alexis Okeowo, have a controversy over whether “technology to enhance human life” (par. 1) is acceptable for the replacement for “healthy parts of their bodies” (par. 1). Okeowo believes the people are making “a once-unthinkable choice” (par. 3) because “Instead of doing everything possible to preserve and live with whatever is left of their limbs, some are opting to amputate more extensively to regain something more akin to normal function” (par. 3). Slotnik agrees with Okeowo and wants to know “Where, in general, do you draw the line in terms of using science and technology to enhance human life” (par. 1). Slotnik is a stakeholder in this controversy because he is directly asserting himself as an opposed person in the article. Other stakeholders consist of the amputees, because they are the people directly affected by the situation.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Augmenting people for the sake of scientific advancement is a topic, which can lead to excitement and hope for the future. Sonia Miller believes that “[b]y welcoming and adopting new technologies [...], the human condition can be redesigned, allowing for personal growth beyond the current biological limitations” (Miller, 61). Although, this type of augmentation also raises serious ethical and social concerns among the general population. The depiction of augmented humans in popular media has become a significant thematic topic, in which our real world discussions influence. Media, such as the popular videogame series Halo, consistently show how biologic and mechanical augmentations are beneficial, and necessary, for the human population’s advancement.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Technology continues to play an important role in our lives where technological advancements throughout the world aids and improves our daily lives. The goal with technology is to make our lives easier and is evident in The Techno-Human Condition by Braden Allenby and Daniel Sarewitz. Throughout the first two chapters they discuss the concept of transhumanism and how the growth of technology will continue to enhance humans rather than deteriorate or downgrade. A prime example is with biotechnology and robotics where the brain and body are enhanced with technology creating a cyborg like superhuman. Although the movement to reach this point will not quickly be accomplished, but there is gradual improvement over the years.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Sandel in “The case Against Perfection” talks about benefits and drawbacks in genetic engineering, designer children, and bionic athletes. The benefit is that improving technological advancement, we will be able to treat and prevent many diseases that are prevalent today. The downside is that exponential growth of technologies will allow us to manipulate our own nature, to enhance our cognitive abilities, physical strength, and choose genetic traits of our children to make ourselves “better than well” (Sandel, 2004). Sandel argues that Genetic engineering offers us the power to master our nature, but that kind of power & choice threatens our ability to appreciate life as a gift, and erode human agency by allowing us to serve our purposes…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research Paper On Gattaca

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A big issue that I have with biotechnology is in the Gattaca society, people head towards biotechnology in order for profit. This is an example of society taking biotechnology too far. I believe biotechnology should be used for curing diseases (ie. gene therapy) and not for perfecting human flaws. Since determination is not part of your DNA, you should not discriminate a person based on something they can not control. Vincent has proven that you can do anything you want to, as long as you have determination.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    SUMMARY/PRECIS Professor Ronald Green of Dartmouth University, in his article, Building Baby from Genes Up, addresses the topic of whether or not genetic engineering is a viable technological advancement for our society to pursue and argues that although there are many potential drawbacks, the overall benefits of genetic engineering outweigh its downfalls. He supports this claim by addressing the variety of benefits that genetic engineering can offer, then by categorically refuting counterarguments and finally by presenting his opinion for why each downfall of genetic engineering is surmountable. Green’s purpose is to shed light on both sides of the argument when it comes to genetic engineering, while posing the idea that genetic engineering…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientist’s Responsibility The person who doesn’t take responsibility is equivalent to a leader who doesn’t look after his people; spiraling into failure and destruction. Recently, the hoverboard caused an incident where a celebrity ended up in the emergency room. The people who made the hoverboard should be held responsible because their product injured someone. A scientist is responsible if a person is harmed by his/her new creation.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is it okay to allow parents to pick and choose how their child should look, as if they are in Build-a Bear Workshop? Scientists in today’s modern world have made immense progress in the field of genetic engineering. Many have rightfully chided scientists and this new development of errant technology due to the unethical consequences that genetic alteration of children brings. One of those consequences is that a society gap will arise from the manipulation of an embryo’s genes. Additionally, a child’s consent will be to be ignored if their genes are altered without consent.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The introduction of a new idea is often met with risks and turmoil. These are unintended and unforeseen consequences that come inherent with the disruption of the status quo by an eager challenger. Whether or not this idea actually holds merit is irrelevant; what is important is that society possesses the necessary information to fully understand its potential impact, both now and into the future. Currently, this new attractive idea is genetic manipulation. On the surface, genetic engineering, or GE, offers tremendous opportunity for personal betterment – whether it is tweaking IQ, forging muscle, or building stamina, never has true biological perfection been so attainable as it is today.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the story it would be acceptable to use biotechnological enhancements if it meant the society would be turned from dystopian to utopian, meaning they would lift up the ungifted to bring equality to everyone while giving them an advantage at the same time. A place where society does not have to take time to make each person that is advanced be…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walter Glannon explores several moral problems with genetic enhancement in his article “Genetic Enhancement,” published in Glannon’s book, From Genes and Future people: Philosophical Issues in Human Genetics (and later in Bioethics Principles, Issues, and Cases.) Glannon believes that “gene therapy is permissible if it is intended to ensure or restore normal functions, but it is morally illegitimate if it is aimed at enhancing functions beyond normal.” (577) Glannon, a professor of bioethics and philosophy at the University of Calgary, holds the Canada Research Chair in Biomedical Ethics and Ethical Theory at the University of Calgary in Alberta. He is well known for publishing 4 books and over 27 articles related to bioethics and philosophy.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today, there are more thoughts about allowing parents to bioengineer their children. Instead of relying on fate to see how their baby turns out, some people want the power to genetically modify their kids before birth. For example, if a parent wanted a tall boy, they could predetermine this. Contrastingly, Michael Sandel argues bioengineering because again, it takes away the giftedness of children. He explains, “To appreciate children as gifts is to accept them as they come, not as objects of our design, or products of our will, or instrument of our ambition,” (45).…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Technology And Race

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ever since the times of cavemen, technology has propelled the evolution of the human race in immensely incredible ways. Tens of thousands of years ago, technological inventions such as fire and the wheel would be groundbreaking, but now, in modern times, this is taken for granted. Humans have come to the point where modifying organisms is the new norms of technology. Modern technology has changed the entirety of the human race. Technology has been able to modify human beings, increase the intelligence of any organism, and save lives that would not be saved without the help of technological advancements.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “At what point do children become artifacts designed to someone’s specifications rather than members of a family to be nurtured? (Hayes 245).” In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” Richard Hayes argues against Ronald M. Green, a professor of Emeritus of Religion and of Ethics and Human Values at Dartmouth College, specifically responding to his essay about using genetic technology to change children’s DNA. Hayes, who holds a Ph.D. in Energy and Resource, which saluted the United States to ban human cloning worldwide, believes it would disrupt human nature and the human future.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics