Modigliani And Miller's Irrelevance Theory Of Capital Structure

Decent Essays
INTRODUCTION Modigliani and Miller’s (1958) irrelevance theory of capital structure was a landmark research in the field of finance, leading to an increased interest in the corporate capital structure and its determinants amongst scholars over the following years. Essentially, Modigliani and Miller conclude that under certain assumptions, the market value of a firm and its capital structure are not related (Proposition 1). Additionally, they suggest that the expected yield of a stock share increases as the debt-to-equity rises, meaning that an investor would require a premium as a compensation to the risk stemming from the higher leverage (Proposition 2). It is important to note that Modigliani and Miller assume several restrictions for their …show more content…
Specifically, by removing the tax absence assumption, the trade-off theory implies that there are tax benefits as a result to interest payments by a firm, leading to higher market value. However, debt financing in a market with imperfections is suggested to involve some costs. Kraus and Litzenberger (1973) provide an example of this by proving that a potential increase of bankruptcy costs, as a result to higher gearing, would imply a decrease in the market value of a firm. Under these assumptions, a firm would set a target debt-to-equity ratio, which would balance the tax benefits and the costs arising from leverage in an optimal way (Myers 2003). An alternative approach to trade-off theory is known as pecking order theory (Myers 1984). Myers suggest that a company wishing to raise funds to prefer internal financing, debt as second option and new equity issue as the least preferred option. Pecking order theory takes into consideration not only the costs of bankruptcy but information asymmetry and transaction costs as well, in order to interpret the financing behavior of the …show more content…
As Grigore and Ştefan-Duicu (2013) state, according to agency theory the optimal capital structure of a firm is the outcome of a reconciliation of the conflicts of interest between the creditors, the managers and the shareholders of the firm. A lot of effort has been made so far to identify the determinants of the capital structure, but still there is not a generally accepted view. Furthermore, the stability of the capital structure is another important issue that concerns modern finance theory (DeAngelo and Roll 2015) The purposes of this paper are firstly to provide some insight on the determinants of the corporate capital structure and secondly to examine the extend at which it remains stable over the time. Literature review As mentioned in the previous chapter, the efforts of determining how the capital structure decision is influenced were concentrated by removing the strict assumptions of Modigliani and Miller irrelevance theorem (1958). In their subsequent work, Modigliani and Miller (1963) find that in the presence of taxes, leverage would create a tax shield, through the interest payments (trade-off

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Underinvestment due to asymmetric information may lead to the cases when some positive NPV projects are not taken into account while the management decides to invest in lower quality projects which may need external financing sources (Myers and Majluf, 1984). Hence, the main concern of shareholders is to ensure that managers run the firm with proper resources in order to maximize its value. This requires shareholders to seek a solution of the principal-agent problem. It is recommended that financing policies should be used as an efficient and economical tool for shareholders to diminish the agency problems (Grossman and Hart, 1980;…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    With the increase in debt marginal benefit of further increases in the debt declines while the marginal cost increases, so that a firm which is optimizing its overall value will focus on the trade-off when choosing how much debt and equity to use for financing. As, using equity is initially more expensive than debt because it is ineligible for the same tax savings, but becomes more favourable as compared to the higher levels of debt because it does not carry the same financial risk. Another trade-off consideration to take into account is that the interest payments can be written off, dividends on equity that tare usually issued by a firm cannot. Combine with the fact that issuing new equity is often seen as a negative signal by the market investors, which can decrease value and returns of a firm. As further capital is raised and the marginal costs increase, the firm must find a fine balance in whether it should use debt or equity after internal financing when raising new…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is because if the investment goes wrong, the shareholder would lose his dividends. This is referred to as the investor’s opportunity cost of capital for that particular period. Thus, the argument is that the more the company retains its profits, the lower the distribution dividend policy and the more the shareholder has to be compensated for the additional risk due to these uncertainties about future cash flows. This was basically what Myron Gordon argued about in 1959. He stated that the investor’s required rate of return rt would rise due to a rise in the firm’s profits.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

     It shows the percentage of total assets that are financed by the creditors. Interest cover ratio = Earnings before interest and taxes/ Interest expense  Measures the ability of the company to repay its interests on debts.  A high ratio indicates its better ability on repayment. Ratios related to distribution decision process Table 4 below introduces three types of ratios related to distribution and their implications. Dividend Yield Ratio would show a general picture to the shareholders about how extent to be worthwhile to invest this company comparing with the market price.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In a nutshell, these two theories encompass conflicting outcomes with one another; however, they both indicate that leverage impacts the market value of the firm – unlike the M & M Proposition I. To assess the validity of these three theories, empirical studies come to place. There is a wide agreement among empirical studies that Static Trade-off Theory is valid. That is, debt capital decreases the market value of firms. Future studies should try to create a comprehensive approach of the effect of debt in market value of firms.…

    • 2676 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This model presents a different way of looking at investment decisions by considering how the investment is financed. The financial hierarchy theory asserts that to minimize asymmetric information costs and other financing costs, firms should finance investments first with retained earnings, then with safe debt and risky debt, and finally with equity (Myers & Majluf, 1984). This theory suggests that firms do not have target cash levels, but cash is used as a buffer between retained earnings and investment needs. Thus, the motive for holding cash is to avoid external financing. Consequently, when retained earnings are inadequate to finance new investments, firms use their cash holdings and then issue new debt and finally when they get out of their debt servicing capacity they will issue securities.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For example the low income earners will prefer higher dividend to meet their consumption needs while the high income earners will prefer less dividend so as to avoid the payment of taxes. Therefore when a firm sets a certain dividend policy there will be shifting of investors to it and out of it until equilibrium position is reached. At equilibrium, the dividend policy set by the firm will be consistent with the clientele it…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Agency costs derive from conflicts of interest between the different stakeholders of the firm and because of ex post imbalance information (Jensen and Meckling (1976) and Jensen (1986)). Hence, incorporating agency costs into the static trade-off theory means that a firm determines its capital structure by trading off the tax advantage of debt against the costs of financial distress of too much debt financing and the agency costs of debt against the agency cost of equity. Many other cost factors have been assumed under the trade-off theory, and it would difficult to discuss them all. Therefore, this discussion ends with the assertion that an important prediction of the static trade-off theory is that firms target their capital structures. if the actual leverage ratio differ from the optimal one, the firm will adapt its financing behavior in a way that brings the leverage ratio back to the optimal…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is the expected rate of return applies to implicit the risk of start-up business. Investors likely to charge higher rates on investment to compensate for hold the specific risk of new firms. The rate should be between 30% to 70% depends on financial performance, management expertise and nature of business. Market Adjusted Rate: The rate of return in CAPM model that used to discount the cash flows which is adjusted based on risk links with the assets. For example, risk free rate and risk premium are core components to determine the cost of capital on CAPM pricing model where beta measures the systematic risk only which can not be diversified.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Additionally, some short term securities include treasury bonds, stocks, mutual funds, money market funds or even certificates of deposits, in which a company may use to earn quick cash. Some firms have a short term investment account, if their financial position is strong; whereas the company makes investments to gain a high interest, thus increasing its revenues (Gramlich et al, 2001). Arora et al (2014) says that over the long term, the uncertainty around the evolution of asset value will dominate the lack of precision in information. Gramlich et al (2001) added that short term debt causes long term debt ratios to shift in the opposite direction, if the current debt is classified as long term. A firm seeking to make a short term investment decision, will more than likely gain short bursts of cash or cash…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays