Stanley Milgram's Experiment Of Obedience

Improved Essays
Stanley Milgram, was a famous social psychologist, he was also a student of Solomon Asch, and conducted a controversial experiment that was done in 1961, Milgrams classic obedience study, the investigation to the obedience to authority. Milgram’s experiment of obedience was done in 1961 soon after World War 2 had ended this was when the trials for war crimes against the Nazi’s were being done at the time. Milgram put a question on the experiment that what if the Germans during WWII were simply obeying to authority that was given when carrying out the Holocaust or were they all acting on their own?. The experiment was on Obedience to authority. The experiment was conducted on the behalf of Adolph Eichman, a man who was convicted of war crimes during the war, but he was following the orders of his authority. Adolf Eichmann signed out the death sentences of other people but he did not actually do the killings himself. The main reason for the experiment was to find out if people would obey higher authority even though the task at hand would be morally wrong.
During the experiment there was an experimenter who answered the questions of the teacher and recorded his results. There was also a learner, a paid actor who was not actually harmed during the experiment, that was supposed to be shocked each time he
…show more content…
Milgram’s experiment showed how an individual’s behavior can change because of authority. In the end, the participants did not stop, even though they felt concerned over the person being shocked, who they believed was in pain over the shocks they were giving him. Many of the participants agreed to do whatever the experimenter asked them to do without questioning the instructions. This is said could have been because of the fact that the experiment was conducted at Yale

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After conducting an experiment which tested several subjects’ abilities to resist authority, Stanley Milgram came to the conclusion that acts of evil are not conducted by sadistic humans, but obedient ones. This concept, known as the banality of evil, was introduced in Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem and can be traced to the Nuremburg Trials, in which Nazi Germans killed millions of Jews based on the orders that they were told to follow. In the experiment, subjects were told to send a series of shocks to a patient, with each shock containing increasingly more voltage. Milgram found that most subjects were willing to shock the patients despite hearing cries of agony, either because the subjects allowed responsibility to be placed on the…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Liberals are from Mars and conservative from Venus. The main theme of Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences is to present the reader with how neither is better than the other, but different. The book focuses on the analysis on how biology determines our political views and inclinations. John R. Hibbings, Kevin B. Smith and Jon R. Alford are the authors of Predisposed. As biopoliticians, they provide evidence of people’s view and how it differs based on biology.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inspired by the horrific acts committed by thousands of seemingly “normal” individuals during the Holocaust, Stanley Milgram set out to discover the causes and triggers of unquestioning obedience. He inquired why so many people from uneventful backgrounds followed orders from the most tyrannical and prejudice leader ever facing this world. Basing his theory from that of a grade school friend and famous situationist—Philip Zimbardo—Milgram began to explore the possibility of a situation to force a person to act in opposition of their deepest values and morals. His curiosity resulted in the perpetually debated Milgram Obedience Experiments.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1 The Milgram study was done with the objection of finding out whether obedience for from an authoritative figure was a common occurrence, for example, the killing of Jews by Nazis. Therefore, how long were subjects willing to inflict pin on another person when asked to, despite knowing the seriousness of the injuries. From the experiment, the experimenter established routine through the use of the predefined prods such as ‘please go on and please continue (Myers & Twenge, 2017).’ That way the subject would know what to do when they would hear these words.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, began an experiment in July 1961 that would drastically alter society’s perception of obedience. Milgram formulated a test to comprehend how far people would perform when coerced into obeying an authoritative figure. The experiment involved subjects being tricked into believing they were electrically shocking another individual; physical and emotional harm to the subjects was followed, resulting from the extreme tension they encountered. Ultimately, Milgram thought he found an underlying connection between his experiment and the Holocaust. The study manufactured mixed reactions from society.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary purpose of the Milgram's obedience/electroshock experiment was to test people's obedience to authority. I feel the test was able to fulfill its objectives. It was successful because it should that the majority of people tested were willing to fully accept, with some reservations, what a authority figure instructed them to do. In The Real World by Ferris and Stein (2008), we are told that to conducted the experiment a system was set were a research subject was assigned being a teacher and then two others who were administering the test would join, one as experimenter, the other as a learner. The teacher was then shown the learner being strapped to a chair and electrodes being attracted to there body.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stanley Milgram Outline

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages

    1. Explain and discuss the background events and ideas which led to Milgram’s research. Stanley Milgram (1963) was a American social psychologist who carried out the destructive obedience experiment at Yale University in 1963. He was very interested in how far people would go in a situation where it meant hurting another person under an authority figures orders. If an authority figure affected obedience levels in everyday American men. This idea came about after Adolf Eichmann's trial in Jerusalem in 1961.…

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He claims that the subject needed a clearer way to disobey to improve this experiment. Milgram would argue that in real life scenarios no one tells you that you can disobey if you want, it is up to the individual if they certainly feel uncomfortable and uneasy to stand up for their morals. An article over Milgram and his experience from Wayne State University’s psychology department would logically bring attention to the credentials of Yale University and how that may affect the subjects’ thoughts: Why would you think that a large highly regarded university performs potentially dangerous experiments to random volunteers (Wayne State)? It discusses how this is a relevant factor in the subjects decision making. Milgram would state that the Nazis were in the same boat.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The subjects behavior would have been much different if it was known to them that their authority figure was just an actor. The third regulation violated was the Right to Withdraw. The authority figure in the experiment made it difficult for subjects to withdraw by urging them to continue with the shocks. The fourth guideline violated was Risk, also known as the protection from mental or physical harm. There were many ways in which The Milgram Experiment may have harmed the participants psychologically.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two psychological experimenters attempted to uncover the most brutal area of the human brain in their articles: Milgram 's "The Perils of Obedience" and Zimbardo 's "The Stanford Prison Experiment". The first and earliest of these experimenters was Stanley Milgram, who conducted his experiments at Yale University. He starts the article with information on testing whether or not a person would administer painful—and eventually lethal—shocks to other people when given the order by an authoritative person in the room with the ‘teacher’. His results were indeed surprising: twenty-five people out of forty administered lethal shocks when instructed. He includes excerpts from the experiment to add to his argument.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baumrind often disagreed with the ethics of the Milgram Experiment; however, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than she. Diana Baumrind, author of, Review of Stanley Milgram 's Experiments on Obedience, claims in his experiments the ethics he possessed were immoral and wrong. Throughout her article she continually disagreed with everything Milgram had "achieved", starting from the first experiments results which appeared as a review in American Psychologist in 1963 (Baumrind 89). While Diana disputed what she thought was the atrocious ethics of Milgram 's experiments, she furthermore believed Milgram should have debriefed the subjects more than what he had done (95). Although Baumrind opinionated her thoughts on these issues,…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays