Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

Improved Essays
McCloskey believes evil is nothing more than imperfection inside the world and uses this notion to argue that there is no divine purpose of the world. In this case we must acknowledger the flaws in the teleological and the cosmological argument. In addition, he believes no perfect being would create a world with suffering and evil. To this I would say in order to distinguish that something is good you have to know something is bad. This comes along with feelings and emotions that brings us to the thought of how our feelings are created. We don’t create them ourselves; it’s something that triggers them. That something is the spirit of the living God who allows us to feel love, hate, sadness, joy and all other emotions. Good and evil has no real …show more content…
He makes statements such as the suffering of pain being the highest form of evil. He persistently expresses his disbelief that a perfect God would allow someone to suffer or endure pain. Based on logic, one would think that it is irrational for an omnipotent and loving God to allow evil to exist (Evans, & Manis, 2009). What McCloskey has to understand is it is God did not create the world with evil, man made bad choices and indulged into evil.
In book of Genesis chapters 1 and 2, reveals how evil was never apart of the original plan. Until an atheist can prove that evil and the existence of God contradict each other, there is no valid reason that proves God doesn’t exist based on the existence of evil (Evans & Manis, 2009). Another thing McCloskey needs to recognize is that atheism is a form of theism. While atheism may worship an idol god/self and the Creator it still requires lots of faith. Our faith is not something you can physically touch, neither is God but it is the belief that his spirit exist that keeps us grounded. The works of God mankind will never understand because we are merely flesh and blood, this is why we have to allow our spirits and faith to guide

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In his attempt to understand why God doesn't intervene to prevent evil, B.C. Johnson uses common claims made by many theists to disprove the goodness of God. Building the article upon a hypothetical example of a baby being burned alive in an electrical house fire, Johnson bases his stance on God's goodness on whether or not God saves the baby. According to Johnson, God is not good if he does not intervene tragedies and is likened to a bystander who's fully capable of helping but doesn't. Whether or not the baby goes to heaven doesn't matter as long as the baby has to suffer in that house fire. God is compared to a physician or a firefighter that doesn't assist so that people wouldn't be dependent upon an outside power or to promote moral urgency.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So positive that he confidently states: “No being who was perfect could have created a world in which there was avoidable suffering or in which his creatures would (and in fact could have been created so as not to) engage in morally evil acts, acts which very often result in injury to innocent persons.” After reading this I feel as if McCloskey is blaming the evil doing on God. We in fact know that no man is able to answer the question of why men innocent people. We however can entail that men make their own decisions. It is the ones that believe in God that repent on his mistake made, while being in an evil mind set.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout daily life, there is a constant theme: good versus evil. This continuous comparison of the good to the evil is fundamentally within each person, whether it is known or not. People define others with these concepts by only knowing their basic qualities. This idea of good versus evil provides a distinct template in which discerns those who are characteristically good, and characteristically evil. Though, what draws this line, or, how exactly do humans define good and evil?…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McCloskey’s article, “On being an atheist” presented ideals and points that were thought provoking. It can be seen from the beginning of the article, McCloskey is a proud, and seemingly closed minded atheist. This type of attitude when debating such a heavily weighted topic becomes difficult to engage and even persuade. Throughout his article, McCloskey discusses four areas that surround atheism. The four areas are: Cosmological Argument, Teleological Argument, Problem of Evil, and Atheism as Comforting.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discourse in Favor of the Reality of Time: An Argument against McTaggart’s Unreality of Time In this paper, I will first begin by explaining J. Ellis McTaggart’s argument and reasoning to why he believes that time is unreal , followed by my opinion on his defense of the argument and conclude with a rejection of his premise to prove the reality of time. Before attempting to explain McTaggart’s argument, it is necessary to first establish certain basic concepts that drive his arguments, A series and B series. The A series, as described by McTaggart, is a non-permanent position of an event with the distinction of past, present, or future.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He thought that not a lot of people would be willing to compromise and accept one of those beliefs however, because if someone did they would be left with the conclusion that their high and all mighty God was in fact un-worthy of worshipping. After Mackie comes up with his own take on the problem of evil, he agrees with a lot of the points the problem of evil considers, and comes to the conclusion that the problem of evil is both inconsistent and illogical. Mackie set out to disprove the common belief that God was in fact an “omnipotent and wholly god” by coming up with an argument. He breaks the problem down to three propositions.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Divine Command Theory is a theory that proposed that an action’s status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God. There are two objections to the Divine Command Theory. Even if all religions agree about how God regards some action, there is still the question of whether or not they correctly report what God commands. Although this point is offered as an objection to the Divine Command Theory, Sober does not think that it shows that the theory is false. He thinks that the theory doesn’t claim to describe how we can find if actions are right or wrong.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All voluntary actions, those that require thoughts and imagination to complete, come from the will. But an endeavor must come between the decision of the will and the voluntary act. “This endeavor, when it is toward something which causes it, is called appetite or desire…. And when the endeavor is fromward something, it is generally called aversion” (Leviathan 34). Consequently, ‘good’ is the object of appetite while ‘evil’ is the object of aversion.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil, God and its Existence Jennifer Morgan Religion Quest Sister Sally UIW Fall 1 Evil, God and its existence Evil has been a topic of discussion and concern for years. Some wonder why evil exists and some are just concerned with not getting wrapped up with evil. Evil is necessary and allowed to exist by the almighty for several reasons. With all the questions about why evil exists, I know we are not to question God and his actions and plans.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Analysis

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In recent discussions of animals being killed in the fashion industry, a controversial issue has been whether it’s morally correct or not. On one hand, some argue that there are so many animals and we use them for meat so why not use them for fashion. On the other hand, however, others argue that animals should still have rights and killing them is an inhumane thing to do. In summary, the issue is whether to use animal skin in the fashion world to please the consumers.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the world is scientifically advancing, the existence of God is in doubt by many. I am arguing Philosopher Simon Blackburn’s claim that the existence of evil strongly suggests that there isn’t a god who is all-good, all-knowing and all-powerful is wrong. Since God is omniscience, omnipotence and omnibenevolence, Blackburn believes the idea of God contradicts all the bad happening in this world. He supposes if god had more power, he would destroy evil. Since evil exists, then god isn’t what we claim he is.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why Do Proof God Exist

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Additionally, he states that “If we use the causal argument at all, all we are entitled to infer is the existence of a cause commensurate with the effect to be explained, the universe, and does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-perfect, uncaused cause” (McCloskey, n.d., p. 63). Moreover, it is important to understand what it means to prove or not to prove God is real. By scientific methods or reasoning, we can never have proof of God, but it does not mean that this argument is completely misplaced. Besides, scientifically attempting to verify God’s existence has limitations in measuring aspects of reality. Scientifically speaking, there is not a way to measure love, hate, or in this case impartiality.…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To prove his point, he provided an example of an individual or a loved one who has encountered a suffering. According to McCloskey, it would be more profitable and/or reasonable for an individual to seek comfort and strength where it is available, rather than in God, who caused his or her suffering. Within William Lane Craig’s work, The Absurdity of Life without God, he continuously makes the point that without God life would have no purpose or value (Craig, 2008). Thus, in a situation of suffering, an individual would pathetically seek a means of escape; however, even to seek a means of escape would be useless since there is no purpose in life, to begin with. Therefore, if this individual continues to think there are means of escape that would provide a “happy ending”, he or she is only deceiving his/herself.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The problem of evil has been a debated topic for many years. The question of, “why does God let bad things happen in the world” has intrigued many theologians and non-religious persons alike. To answer this question, I asked myself a few other questions. What are the assumptions, interpretation and inferences on the topic? How does point of view or perception effect this subject?…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    66. What is God, or better, WHO IS ‘GOD’? • Undeniably, the belief system of anyone is closely connected to the achieved step on the ladder of Evolution. Therefore, an inherent aptitude cannot be voluntarily modified into something else the person cannot be ‘mentally comfortable’ with. Not surprisingly, that throughout the history, in the natural absence of the clear consensus on Existence of God and character of God, various concepts have emerged among Terrestrial Humans.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays