Locke Vs Hobbes

Decent Essays
The writings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke dominated political philosophy during the seventeenth century. While these men were two of the most influential philosophers on government of all time, they both had distinct views that sometimes clashed with one another. Two differences that existed between Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were there views on the state of nature in regard to satisfying needs and justice.

In Thomas Hobbe’s Leviathan, Hobbe’s believes that there is always constant war in a state of nature. He states that people are in a constant struggle to satisfy their own needs. This common struggle therefore creates brute competition among citizens. Hobbe’s specifically states if two men desire the same thing that they can’t

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    John Locke was very different from another great philosopher named Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes believed that the individual was completely helpless and corrupt. He believed that a monarchy was the best form of government. He came up with this because he traveled around the world learning about forms of government to help England’s. John locke, on the other hand, believed only that the whole was better than the self.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leah Schulz Professor Jennifer Hanson History 2- 81010 September 07, 2017 Hobbes vs. Locke Both, Hobbes and Locke, were known as social contract theorists as well as natural law theorists. Hobbes is well known for writing Leviathan and Locke is well known for writing Treatises on Government. However, they are different in regards to their stand and conclusions in several laws of nature. Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher from Malmesbury. He first started rising to fame when his book Leviathan, laid the foundation of Western political philosophy.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke and Thomas Hobbes had very opposite theories. Thomas Hobbes idea was very different from the natural law but John Locke’s idea was close and similar to the natural law. Locke’s theory was the efficiency of getting what the people want. John Locke might have followed the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes and cooperated to a different theory but his theory is the better understanding of the nature of…

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes Vs Erasmus

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Advice to Young Leaders Response Paper #3: Erasmus and Hobbes Both Thomas Hobbes and Erasmus, although born of different time periods, were political philosophers with humanist training. However, their similarities to not end there, as they both sought to provide a comprehensive framework for leadership through their works of The Education of a Christian Prince and Leviathan respectively. While Hobbes and Erasmus hold similar views on the structure of a state and that of man, they sharply disagree on the qualities that make a good leader. Hobbes and Erasmus generally agree upon the nature of the state, although their views begin to subtly diverge when it comes to the nature of the citizens that populate them and their obligations to their…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes And John Locke

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both Hobbes and Locke have both simpler and different ideas about the role of government. Like how much government should be in our lives and if we have the right to rebel against the government. One of the core concepts Locke discusses that each man has a natural true to energy, leave, and property while uniting that governments must not flour these rights based on the sociable contract. In Locke's…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Locke and Hobbes disagreed about the nature of people, both of them made a point of stating that people had inalienable rights. Locke’s whole basis of philosophy was based on the belief that every human had natural rights, rights that existed…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau Vs Hobbes

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Why do philosophical anarchists believe that obedience to the state is morally unjustifiable? Philosophical anarchists make the argument that obedience to state commands is unjustifiable as it fundamentally clashes with the individuals’ obligation to be morally autonomous. And in order for a state to function, it needs to be able to issue moral obligations.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hobbes beilved the goverment was to protect us from ourselves and Locke beilved it was to protect the natural rights. Hobbes beilved that the goverments power can not be limited and Locke beilved it…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Initially their similarities, followed by the differences. Concluding with a summary of some main points. I. Thomas Hobbes Both political philosophers, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and John Locke (1632-1704) have similar ideas in…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His similarities to Locke have much to do with the social contract theory, which he was also believed in. Despite this, the two theories differ fundamentally on why government has its place in society and how influential government can be. (p.15). Hobbes put a great emphasis on government, probably in part due to the era in which he lived. Hobbes did not quite live long enough to see the Enlightenment and the new ideals that shortly followed.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Locke are both social contract theorists who have influenced many citizens of this country. To begin, they both start out talking about human nature. Locke and Hobbes had very different views regarding human nature. Locke claimed human nature as reason and Hobbes claimed it as power and appetite. Locke believes that reason is the primary attribute of human nature.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both theorists believe in natural rights and freedoms and how men establish governments in order to secure peace however they differ on the purpose of government. Hobbes believed the purpose of government is to impose law and order to prevent the state of war. Locke believed the purpose of government is to secure natural rights, namely man’s property and liberty. Both refer to a “state of nature” in which man exists without government, and both speak of risks in this state. However, while both speak of the dangers of a state of nature, Hobbes is more pessimistic, whereas Locke speaks of the potential benefits.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main similarity being what the purpose of the government or political power is, whereas the main difference is how they view the state of nature. Hobbes views the state of nature as a state of war, whereas Locke views it still as a society, but one that lacks true executive powers. Both philosophers made great contributions to political philosophy, but each had their own failures which later political philosophers tried to fix: “The tradition of political theory that begins with Hobbes and Locke, and continues today with Rawls and Habermas and their innumerable followers, has a blind spot, to which several theorists drew attention in the 1990s. That blind spot is the question of nationhood and nationalism” (Alexander-Davey, p.458). Overall, Hobbes and Locke had their differences, but each added something new to the conversation of political philosophy and the state of…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau all agree on the hypothetical starting point of the state of nature, but they disagree on the details. Both Hobbes and Locke agree that the state of nature is associated with the state of war, while Rousseau believes that man is perfectly stable and non-violent. In order to understand the connection between human nature and war, we have to analyze each philosopher 's point of view. In Hobbes ' work, The Leviathan, he emphasizes that nothing could be worse than a life without protection provided from a well-functioning state.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays