Thomas Hobbes's Theory Of Liberty

Improved Essays
LIBERTY

This essay is a written accord of the theory of libertarianism, is liberty present in the current state of society, is it necessary to achieve peace or to reach a more enlightened society. How as liberty changed since its first conception, is freedom and liberty correlated or they 2 different concepts with similar ideals.
What is liberty? What is freedom? What is independence? Then I ask you, are these necessary for peace, are there necessary for enlightenment. If you never had liberty would it be different from if you had would it change your perception on life and society. Liberty in this modern day has become a remnant of the past, a past where people were enlightened enough to tell the difference between the oppressors and guardians,
…show more content…
His main concern is the political and social order, how humans can preside together in peace while avoiding the dangers and terrors of civil conflict. His solution is that society should pledge their obedience and well being to an unaccountable sovereign (Leviathan) otherwise what awaits us is a state of nature that is vaguely like civil conflict and war. Hobbes concept of “the state if nature” is what would exist if there were no government, no civilization, no common power to restrain human nature, Hobbes described it as the “war of all against all,” where by human beings constantly seek the destruction and condemnation of each other in pursuit for power. “Life in the state of nature is nasty, brutish and short.” The state in nature in my opinion is a real or hypothetical condition of human beings without or lacking political association, the theory relies on the basis that their selfish and greedy beings who only function to forward their own agendas. Hobbes then imposed the solution that lays the conditions that “to escape this people would enter into a social contract; they would give up their freedom in return for the safety and order of an organized society.” The people would have to sacrifice their very liberties and freedom to achieve a more peaceful society however even though the society is trifled with corruption and injustices it is great if there’s peace and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    on Liberty is the state of being free within a society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority (such as the government) on ones way of life or behaviour. John Stuart Mill was a 19th century philosopher and political thinker who proposed the question: To what extent does society have the right to control and impose limits on thoughts, beliefs and actions of individuals? He believed that this would be a question of the future and tried to answer this question. In his famous essay On Liberty, Mill sets out to investigate “the nature and limits of the power which can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual” and who actually exercises power over individuals. Berlin defined being free as “not being interfered with by others.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberty is simply freedom. “The shortest definition I know is, liberty is freedom. It is, however, as important to know what it does not mean as it is to know what it does mean.” (Stewar) I cannot think of a better way to define liberty. Some may experience liberty in their personal lives because of many reasons. It is the right to speak one’s mind, voice opinions, and to decide who is going to lead a nation and that in itself is liberty.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also reckons we need freedom to create an enlightened society and achieve happiness. However, how difficult is it to uphold the moral law? To answer this question from a Kantian point of view, any action performed must be done from a duty to the highest moral law in order to have any moral worth. What determines whether an action has moral worth or not is the maxim. Freedom ends when your choices begin to affect other people and morality is universal.…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rousseau places a great deal of importance on the common good and therefore somewhat rejects personal freedoms. He believes that in order to be a part of the Social Contract, in which he believes man is free, personal freedom must be ignored. In the state of nature, man is free to indulge in their personal needs and freedoms and therefore must be disregarded in order to unsure the common good. If an individual disagrees with the majority, they are inherently wrong and should be forced to obey the general will. Rousseau states, “whoever refuses to obey the general will will be forced to do so by the entire community” (Rousseau, 150).…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He examines the concept of liberty and the consequences liberty has for a free society and attempts to define liberty as it relates to an individual’s interactions with a government and society. Mill also discusses the effects of collectivism and prevailing opinion on liberty and perceptions of morality. Mill’s interpretations of liberty suggest that within a civilization there is a responsibility to be fair to each entity of society. Mill opens…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one does not give truth a chance to prevail over falsehood, good to triumph over evil, or intelligence to overcome ignorance, then how does one know that they up hold a morally righteous position in society? John Stuart Mill, the author of “On Liberty” argues that freedom of thought, speech, and expression should be absolute no matter how immoral one’s opinion may seem. Mill states “If all of mankind minus one were of one opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.” (Mill, 11) Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and has the right to express it. Even if everyone in the entire world disagrees with one person, they are no more justified…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Enlightenment thinkers wanted to move away from a metaphysical understanding of the law because it fails to provide an adequate understanding. According to Rousseau, moral behaviour can be achieved through reason and reason alone: “All justice comes from God, who is sole source; but if we knew how to government nor laws. Doubtless, there is a universal justice emanating from reason alone; but this justice, to be admitted among us, must be mutual.” What this argument appears to be saying is that there is an absolute morality that can be derived from reason, but this understanding of reason must be shared amongst all human beings. What this absolute understanding of morality does is that it offers human beings with a clear understanding of what is morally acceptable and unacceptable. On the other hand, this understanding of morality does not consider the situation in which a moral judgement has been made.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Can you escape fate? Are we free or are we influenced by outside factors? Does our past determine our future? Philosophers have presented two opposing views to answer the aforementioned questions; do we follow free will or determinism? Free will is the concept that we are free to make our own decision.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The question remains, are we truly free? And does society restrict true freedom? The evidence suggests that society and society 's standards do restrict freedom. Society merely offers a somewhat attractive but unfulfilling alternative, not freedom itself. Throughout American history, as seen in America’s literature, society and societal standards have created an illusion of freedom.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without political law and order. Everybody would have boundless freedoms, including the “right to all things” and in this way, the freedom to steal, sexually assault and murder; there would be a ceaseless war against one another. To stay away from this, free men contact themselves to set up a political group, i.e. civil society, through a social contract in which they all reap security as an end-result of subjecting themselves to utter sovereign, one man or a multitude of men. Despite the fact that the sovereign’s orders may well be self-assertive and domineering, Hobbes saw supreme government as the main contrasting option to the unnerving anarchy of a state of nature.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays