Similarities Between Karl Marx And Durkheim

Improved Essays
At one time in society, there was an uneven distribution of power between the ruling class and the class that was being ruled. In these feudal societies, there was very little chance for members of either class to cross over. Then, a drastic change occurred and the ideas of capitalism and industrialization were being introduced all over the world. Some of the societies accepted this change and became what was known as the capitalist society. Many theorists attempt to explain and simplify these social changes. Among them were two of the most influential thinkers of the 20th century, Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim.
Karl Marx was born on May 5, 1818 in Trier, Prussia. He was a well-known philosopher, economist, sociologist, journalist, and revolutionary
…show more content…
People began to have different values and perspectives, showing alienation, which is exactly what Marx was talking about. Alienated labor takes away the meaning of life and that “life appears only as a means to life.” Living without creativity and only to subsist reduces humans to an animal-like status; they are alienated from the very things that distinguish them as humans” (Dillon, 2010, pg. 54). Workers are in this state of oppression and are not able to fulfill and enjoy their life. For Marx, the division of labor that separates capitalists and workers is a crucial problem in society back then and even in modern time, which can be vividly seen as the industrial revolution moved forward in society. Factory workers were very much alienated because of their job. The workers of Lowell Mill provide us with a clear image of what Marx was talking about. This also led to one of the first strikes that took place. These girls were the lowest employments of women, having to work 14 hours a day in exchange for two dollars (Lowell Mill Girls). The majority of the women were between the ages of 16 and 25, but some were not even 10 yet. The meaning of the strike was, in fact, really simple - they just wanted a change and for people to recognize the efforts that they had

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Change was desperately needed which would involve the government intervening. This strike clearly symbolizes the growing frustrations between labor and management. The workers were taken advantage of and ripped apart by management who was greedy and selfish. This strike screams frustration because the workers just could not do it any longer. They were simply unable to keep up with the inequality which would be extremely frustrating.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Fredric Bastiat and Karl Marx thought themselves to be able to see the future, to be able to see where history was going, to where the world was progressing to. Perhaps they saw themselves to be men of vision, able to predict not only how things would become but how they should become. Whether one considers them to be visionaries or perhaps men with high and unobtainable ideals, is up to one’s self. By some they were thought to be visionaries, some took their words to heart, others would consider their works and their words nothing more than worthless drivel. Both Karl Marx and Fredric Bastiat lived during a similar period of the nineteenth century.…

    • 2117 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, many different types of social and economic theories have developed as a direct response to the problems a given philosopher observed in society. With this in mind, it is interesting to analyze is how two different people can observe similar problems within society and develop different solutions. For example, in the 19th century Karl Marx identified many problems within his society and developed his socialist theories to address these issues. On the other hand, Scottish author and government reformer Samuel Smiles saw similar problems and developed different solutions. His solutions helped Samuels become a recognized “zealous advocate of material progress based on individual enterprise and free trade” (2).…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were many strikes at the time; most every type of worker went on strike at some point. There were great debates and much arguing over wages, working conditions, treatment of workers (mostly over the oppressive standards held by factory owners) and even more. One of the most consequential up-heaves of the period was the women's rights movement. Many women were unhappy with their working conditions, treatment and especially their payment.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx focuses on who controls the means of production, which he asserts creates class divisions between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. For Marx, it was a matter of the rich versus the poor however; for Gilman, the labor problem is one caused be gender oppression, which creates division based on gender differences as opposed to class. And in this case, women are the proletariat and men make up the bourgeoisie. Men control the means of production and essentially run society and establish dominant ideologies while women are regulated to domestic work that they are obligated to because they are women. Additionally, Marx would agree that women suffer from alienation because they are restricted to specialized labor [domestic work] that does not allow them to do anything else.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie both had different views on how the wealthy and the working classes should work together in society, but both sides show reasonable explanations of how it should work. They each tell their thoughts on how the wealthy should redistribute their riches back to society, to help even out the major wealth inequality that is being face. Both have different views on how and how much money shall be redistributed for the greater well being of our nation as a whole. Karl Marx was a very influential person to the sociological world. Karl Marx was born in Prussia on May 5, 1818.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the works and theories of the social theorists during the 19th and early 20th century are still relevant today even with all the changes that we have gone through as a society. The issues discussed in Weber’s and Marx’s class theories; DuBois’ theories about race and Durkheim 's theories on society and labor are the basis on which many of today’s ideologies are derived. Karl Marx was a class theorist and theorized about class struggles and the ideal class society. He also had theories about the construction of society and the interaction between the wealthy and working classes which he called the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. One of his major ideas was that of alienation of the working class.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Class Contradictions in the Communist Manifesto Marxist socialism was designed with the intention of creating a utopia; unfortunately, it turned into one of the greatest political dividing forces the world has seen, but it also encapsulated all the frustration and discrimination the working class suffered through. Marx desired a society with no class or property, and since the working class was the lowest class on the social ladder, this classless society appealed greatly to them. They would be the only class to gain from it, while the other classes would only lose status. Marx viewed class as a natural part of human society, and it was necessary for the level of human development achieved in the Industrial Revolution. The bourgeois had served…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Communist Manifesto was written by German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the 1840’s. It was written during the time period of massive revolutions across Europe. However, its influence would further shape the social and political landscape of Europe during the twentieth century. The Communist Manifesto provided an analytical perspective of the struggle of classism and the problems associated with capitalism. Marx and Engels indicated that at some point in time the communist regime would be replaced by a socialist form of governance.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The period of industrialization influenced the three classical sociological theorists, Marx, Durkheim and Weber. Marx thought of industrialization in the most negative of ways compared to the other sociological theorists. With the rise of industrialization, the social classes changed to who was related to the mean of production, so the owners of the factories and machinery were called the bourgeois, who had more power than the proletariat, those working in the factories, creating the product. With this class distinction, Marx believed that it would lead to problems and conflict between the classes, because each class had their own interest, for instance, the bourgeoisie might be more interested in creating a product faster and cheaper, while…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim are two of the founding figures of sociology. They were the first to explore the relationship between the economy and society in the nineteenth and twentieth century, each developing different perspectives of society. Despite them having significantly different views on modern capitalism, they both played a prominent role in the development of sociology as an academic discipline. This essay provides a biography of Marx and Durkheim and the major works they published. It then focuses on the intellectual and historical contributions they have made and how their works are still influential to contemporary society.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx and Durkheim are 2 sociologists that had very different views on law, and how it should be practiced. While Marx believed that law is determined by the economy, and social inequality. Durkheim believed that law is more of a social phenomenon, and was shaped by what society deemed worth enforcing. I have to say, that both can be true in their own form, as the rich seem to be nearly invincible and untouchable in our country, which can be backed up by Marx’s theory of social inequality. But when it comes to everyday people like myself and my peers, Durkheim's theory is more applicable.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber are three fundamental figureheads in the foundation of sociology who asserted that our lifestyles are products of the society in which we live. They all lived in a period of great social change, that of the Industrial Revolution, and based their writings and musings upon what they observed happening around them and extrapolated as to the condition of the future. One foundational product of contemporary societies, that truly came into existence at the time during which they were writing, would be the economy and economic life. Looking at it on a macro level perspective, it is one of the aspects of the social superstructure. It is a social institution by itself, but it also shares a give and take relationship with other institutions in society and the superstructure such as education, ethics, law, religion, etc.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their system of administration combined both their own as well as Roman elements. The new social order saw the dominance of the military commander, who became the monarch & a new nobility, drawn from warriors and an educated, Romanised elite. Peasants, who constituted their armies, became impoverished due to continual warfare. This led to their enserfment to feudal lords. There existed 2 kinds of groupings in feudal Europe- serfs and lords in villages and craftsmen & journeymen or apprenti who were part of the guild organization in towns.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics