Kant's Deontological Analysis

Improved Essays
Immanuel Kant examined the world of ethics through a deontological, or duty-based, approach. In doing so, he argued that the morality of an action is determined by the action’s adherence to rules or the ability to fulfill one’s duty. Through this deontological approach, Kant held that some acts are always wrong, regardless of whether or not the act results in a favorable outcome. In other words, in terms of morality, he claimed that the consequences of an action are irrelevant. Instead, his theory placed emphasis on the principles behind an action. He believed in a concept known as “goodwill”, which is claimed to be the only thing that can be considered good without qualification. Therefore, the moral worth of an action is dependent upon whether

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By deontological ethics, their reaction was not ethically wrong. According to this approach, moral actions are inherently right or inherently wrong, not depending on outcomes or other extrinsic factors. This is an ethic of rights, duties, and obligations that we know by virtue or moral principles…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology or duty-based ethics is based in the idea that we are morally obligated to follow fundamental rules and principles regardless of the consequences. It focuses on the manner and spirit in which we interact with other individuals, groups, organizations and collectives. While utilitarians are preoccupied with actual results and outcomes, for deontologists, correct intentions and means of going about ones' activities are all-important. In utilitarianism, the act bringing the greatest benefits is always good, but this is not true in deontology. In the deontological perspective, a right action always adheres to the rules and standards of conduct.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology equates rightness (morality) or wrongness (amorality) of action with adherence to or contravention of a specific moral code as determined by society. Deontology draws inspiration from Immanuel Kant’s theory of Categorical Imperative. This Imperative, in short, states that one should only act on universal moral principles; that is, principles which are deontologically moral in action that ought to and can be applied to and practiced by everyone, everywhere, at all times in order to create the most good or happiness for the most people. One good thing about this theory, and Deontology as a whole, is that they promote the greatest good for as many people as possible as most people being happy is more favorable than only a few people being happy.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Deontological ethics is basically the study of duties which are used to perform certain actions regardless of the consequences. Deontology comes from the Greek roots: deos, meaning duty, and logos, meaning study. Prominent deontologist Immanuel Kant believed the key to morality is human will (good will) or intention, not consequences. Categorical imperative- an act based on duty is truly moral.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “in contemporary moral philosophy, deontology is one of those kinds of normative theories regarding which choices are morally required, forbidden, or permitted.” A German philosopher Immanuel Kant agreed upon this and claimed that following it unconditionally is the achievement of ethics. However, his assertion is insufficient and there are some contradictions in it. First of all, one of the major problems is a clash of duties that people have to obey.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Reason is used to focus on the rightness and wrongness of an action, rather than focusing on the consequences. A form of deontology is Kant’s theory whereby duty is done for the sake of the duty, and not for the sake of the benefits of the outcome from doing the duty. Deontology is more suitable as a theory to guide decision in medical ethics because it is intrinsic rather than instrumental. In medical ethics, this creates more of a focus on the patient rather than anything else. However, there is one downfall to deontology.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the movie, Erin Brockovich, Erin is portrayed as a determined, self-sacrificing, compassion and empathy character. Throughout the movie Erin does what she feels is her duty to get what hundreds of people deserve while sacrificing time away from her children. Erin Brockovich is a single mother of three kids that finds herself having a hard time getting a job. After Erin was involved in a car accident, which she wasn’t at fault, she begs her attorney, Ed Masry, to hire her at his law firm company. While working for Ed Masry, Erin came upon some medical records placed into a pro-bono real estate file that caught her eye.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant came out with his theory in answer to the utilitarianist views that were being used at the same time. Those views were focused on the outcome of an action and how much happiness it caused. Kant however, with his moral theory took a more deontological approach. His approach is deontological because it focuses on what should be done regardless of the outcome. For example , if someone tries to do something nice for you, but messes up and causes more problems.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 7 Zack talks about different philosopher view on what is right and wrong. The first philosopher mention is Immanuel Kant and his deontological ethics. Kant’s deontological ethics surround what it means to be good. According to Zack, he is premier theorist on secular human dignity. In other words, he is one of those philosophers who believe religions should not be used to determine what is good.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences, but on whether the moral reason is “from duty”. Actions done “in conformity with duty” or out of self-interest, have no moral worth to Kant. Duty is defined as an individual’s rational understanding of the action their pursuing. This relates to an action’s maxim, which is what you’re doing and why you’re doing it. Two main principles are used to further Kant’s theory, one being the principle of universalizability.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That is, they are concerned with fulfilling what one believes is their moral duty and whether or not it makes people happy. In short, deontologists hold that right actions are defined by duty. Once we know what it is that we are duty bound to do morally, then we can carry out this ‘natural’ right action regardless of the consequences. What matters, they argue, is that we do what is right what is right, and what is right is that which conforms to moral law. One of the leading exponents of this theory is Immanuel Kant.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant Deontological Ethics

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Everything from life to death has two sides and who are we as people to choose which is ethically or morally right or wrong? I am torn on the subject. The way I was raised, I believe that life is precious and committing suicide or ending of a life is a sin against God’s gift; however, I also see the compassionate side of this ethical dilemma, and that no person should suffer in agony when faced with a life threatening disease or injury. There are numerous reasons why finishing life ought to be considered; however, for a few, this may be looked upon as morally wrong. The three inquiries I will address in this paper will be: Should individuals have the privilege to choose when they are prepared to proceed with end of life decisions pertaining…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is true that when a person feels he or she has been done wrong, thought right away is “what if I did the same too you?” and the idea that people should not be a means to an end. Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory that I believe rightly stands on the idea that simply being dependent on maximizing the good despite the action is okay. Consequentialist focus more on the majority and I believe that just because the majority might overcome the minority, fairness is a still a virtue that comes into play along with the guilt when playing fair is not exercised. Kant works through the construction of his theory by offering consistency as a necessary component to a moral code.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays