Deontology Vs Categorical Imperative

Improved Essays
Deontology equates rightness (morality) or wrongness (amorality) of action with adherence to or contravention of a specific moral code as determined by society. Deontology draws inspiration from Immanuel Kant’s theory of Categorical Imperative. This Imperative, in short, states that one should only act on universal moral principles; that is, principles which are deontologically moral in action that ought to and can be applied to and practiced by everyone, everywhere, at all times in order to create the most good or happiness for the most people. One good thing about this theory, and Deontology as a whole, is that they promote the greatest good for as many people as possible as most people being happy is more favorable than only a few people being happy. …show more content…
Also, human beings are sentient organisms capable of a self-awareness that allows us to examine our thoughts and challenge them. The categorical and unwavering nature of deontology leaves little space to do this as the ambiguity of human feeling would provide a shaky foundation on which to base actions. In our society, murder is illegal only sometimes. If a person murders another person and is convicted, that person may in turn be murdered for their actions. On the same note, deontology is beneficial in that within the ideology evil or wrong or prohibited things are always evil, wrong, and prohibited. Deontology does give us the freedom, however, to do as we please as long as every prohibition is met with no bearing the perceived morality of a person. As long as we never do the things which are considered morally wrong, we can do as we

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    As citizens it is our jobs to evaluate every candidate’s proposals so that we can determine which candidate has the “right” or “good” solution to the nation’s problems. Some voters focus only on the consequences of these potential policies while others focus on the consequences and other factors that influence the duties, rights, and rules of the people. The three areas that can easily be discussed in terms of consequences or duties and rights include education, health care, and criminal justice potential policies. In order to find a “right” or “good” solution for both education and health care, I think it is best to focus on only the consequences of the proposals which is known as Consequentialism. However, potential criminal justice policy’s…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantianism Pros And Cons

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In regards to believing if the Patriot Act should have "such a wide lattitude" - permitting the ability to conduct warrantless searches, electronic surveillances; and the ability to collect information from emails and internet trafficing, my personal answer is yes. For example, in terms of National Security, I believe the government should have the "means to monitor and identify individuals" that are linked to "terrorism". In fact, as a United States Veteran of the United States Marine Corps; and who has also served in the LE capacity [i.e. the law enforcment community], alot of my investigations were resolved - due to provisions of the United States Patriot Act. For instance, on numerous occasions I would encounter criminals [i.e. who resided in multiple residences] that "made it difficult for me to track them". Because criminals…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deontology And Utilitarianism In Nursing Essay

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    Deontology focuses on the “principle of the matter” or the actions. Teleology tends to focus more the consequences of the situation. While those who practice Kant’s deontology are bound by duty, the followers of utilitarianism are driven by the pursuit of happiness for all. These two theories are completely opposite in every aspect whether it be the motive, the focus, or the outcome.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the lead surgeon in a major hospital, and by virtue of seniority and the key decision maker for organ transplant cases, involving Jerry, 55-year-old male, a family man and mid-level manager, Lisa 12-year-old female with lifelong health issues, Ozzy, 38-year-old male who happened to be a homeless drug abuser, and finally Dr.Doe, 35-year-old male an oncologist and also Lisa’s dad. Who are all waiting and hoping for suitable heart to become available and a quick sound decision to be made pertaining which of these patients will receive the heart and schedule surgery same day. The most considered will be Dr. Doe, the 35-yearold male an oncologist and Lisa’s dad. This is because, despite the reason that, the organ is not tested for a match.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology focuses doesn’t focus on the results of certain actions, instead it focuses on the reasons for doing certain things. It is looking at your rights and you responsibilities of situations. Those who are following the deontology lifestyle believe that the most ethical path is made by following rules and standards. Deontology is more about morals and treating those how you would like to be treated. Those who follow it look to act in good faith to help other and everything thing else.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let 's not forget about homosexuals. Deontology call for a rule to oversee a decision and all decisions don 't have a rule or duty associated with them. Virtue ethics observes a choice in the setting of one 's personality, although there is some debate as to what dispositions are virtues. I will be discussing how these ethics agree and disagree with abortions, murder, and the rights of an individual. (Kant)…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Deontology is an ethical approach that focuses on the rightness and wrongness of actions themselves, as opposed to peoples’ characters, as they are in virtue ethics, or as opposed to their consequences, as they are in consequentialism. The term deontology comes from the Greek words “deon,” which translates to duty, and “logos,” which translates to science thereby making deontology the study of duty and moral obligations. Its originations come from a German philosopher named Immanuel Kant who is renowned for stating that the wrongness of an action, such as a lie, is not acceptable in any given condition. Kant is most remembered for arguing that it is always better to tell the truth, even if it leads to the death of an innocent person. Kant believed…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Derived from the Greek word deon, meaning duty, Deontology maintains that we are morally obligated to act in accordance with a certain set of principles regardless of outcome. Since the end result should not be taken into consideration, Deontology is a form of nonconsequentialism. Kant argued that the moral value of an action is determined by human will, and good will “is the only thing in the world that can be considered good without qualification” (Kant, 1785). A person must act in accordance with categorical imperatives, meaning one must do an action for the sake of the action and should will that action to become universal law. The Ones…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe the appropriate approach to Beatrice’s request is the Deontological approach. Beatrice’s first responsibility is to her patient, that is her duty as a Registered Dietitian. Principles one and two of the Code of Ethics for Dietetics Professions supports the Deontological approach. Principle 1 - “The dietetics practitioner conducts himself/herself with honesty, integrity, and fairness” (Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2009, p.1).…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the other hand, Deontology, also known as Kantianism, is an ethical theory based in rationalism where the motives determine the ethical value of the act, not the consequences. In deontology, Kant suggests that there are universal ethical rules that are common sense and gathered through reason, not experience (Burkhardt and Nathaniel, 32; vol. 2). Therefore, the moral rules are applicable to everyone regardless of the situation. As a result, everyone who is a person has the right to equality, privacy, veracity, and freedom. Another important aspect of deontology is the idea of humans creating their own destinies and making their own decisions.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This writing piece will define and discuss the statement, “More so than deontology, consequentialism appeals to modern intuitions about morality.” I shall explain why I believe this statement is not true basing my argument in two main postulates. To properly explain the meaning of this statement, there are four main concepts we need to clearly understand, namely, deontology, consequentialism, modern institutions, and morality. Deontology is defined by Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as the moral theory that establishes what we should do and evaluate our choices whether they are allowed, required or forbidden (2007).…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism and deontology are contrasting theories of philosophy that guide us in viewing acts in terms of their morality. The doctrine of consequentialism suggests we should judge the morality of actions purely on the results they produce; whereas deontology aims to judge morality based on the conduct of an individual, and morality is decided from the moral acceptance of a particular action rather than the result the decision produces. These principles of philosophy have existed for thousands of years, with many philosophers throughout history using them as a basis for their work. In the context of an ethical situation, we can thoroughly use these ideologies as instruments to determine an effective solution to prevent a harmful dilemma;…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Such theology refers to one’s duty to act in reference to rules set in place that are not up for negotiation regardless of the individual circumstances. An ethical view such as this is conflicting with the use of police discretion with respect to issuing traffic tickets and arrests made in vice crimes. For instance, if a small group gets together at the local pub to play a friendly game of cards in a state where gambling is illegal, and the officer arrests each subject, the deontological theory would remove the officer’s discretionary decision to enforce the law in victimless crimes. Such arrests can be viewed as harassment according to social norms. While this scenario can certainly be viewed as ethical under the law, Immanuel Kant included the idea that the action must be guided by good intentions to be ethical (Gaines & Kappeler, 2011).…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept or theory that has been the most informative and meaningful to me in helping me have a better understanding of ethics and humans rights in global politics is the Categorical Imperative. The Categorical Imperative states that “people should be treated as ends, never a means to an end” (Amstutz 74). Meaning that if intended result is moral, then the process in achieving that result should also be moral. I’m not a user of people and I wouldn’t myself use people as tools in order for a positive result to occur, I did think however, that if the intended result was for something good to occur, then sometimes one might have to play dirty in order to achieve the goal. However, upon learning about this term I came to realize internally that…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyone has the right to privacy. However, if it is done without the other party’s knowledge, does it count as invading one’s privacy? The ethics of journalists using hidden cameras to report people smugglers comes back around to whether the usage is necessary and if it is morally right. I agree to the use of hidden cameras to a certain extent. People smugglers consists of both groups and individuals who assist others to illegally enter a country at a high price through irregular methods—both air and sea access.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays