Kant Deontological Ethics

Great Essays
Everything from life to death has two sides and who are we as people to choose which is ethically or morally right or wrong? I am torn on the subject. The way I was raised, I believe that life is precious and committing suicide or ending of a life is a sin against God’s gift; however, I also see the compassionate side of this ethical dilemma, and that no person should suffer in agony when faced with a life threatening disease or injury. There are numerous reasons why finishing life ought to be considered; however, for a few, this may be looked upon as morally wrong. The three inquiries I will address in this paper will be: Should individuals have the privilege to choose when they are prepared to proceed with end of life decisions pertaining …show more content…
Deontology is the method to ethics that centers on what is right and what is wrong with the actions committed by an individual instead of what is right or wrong of the consequences of those actions. Immanuel Kant did not believe in ending one’s own life or anyone else’s and criticized that it was morally wrong. Kant stated, “Act in such a way as to treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of anyone else, always as an end and never as a mean” (Kant, 2008, p. 29). Mosser defined Kant’s deontological belief as “An act is good or right if it is done because it is the right thing to do, in accordance with a justified moral rule or rules” (Mosser, 2013, p. 12), as opposed to John Stuart Mill, who believed “An act (or rule) is good or right if it produces the greatest net good for the greatest number” (Mosser, 2013, p. 12). When you are faced with patient assisted suicide due to a diagnosis of an incredibly lengthy illness, Suicide is extremely unthinkable on the planet that we live in today. Christians see suicide as a marker of an absence of trust in God and a rejection of Christ's predisposed arrangement for us. Non-religious individuals view PAS and its outcomes appallingly. They accept that on the off chance that it is authorized individuals would have a serious absence of appreciation for all human life and a few patients would be talked into the PAS by their family and …show more content…
The Deontological theory concentrates on the obligation we have to ethical and moral law. With this law, we see that it is unethical and immoral to take a human life; however, in cases of terminal illness, we see that this theory would allow for a patient to make the decision to take their own life. We in no situation ought to settle on an existence finishing choice for anybody, not to mention ourselves, it is not the upbeat closure both hypotheses request we have. PAS is a very debatable ethical issue where severe suffering and pain of a terminally ill person is met with opposition by those who believe it ignores the value of human

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    It is clear that the utmost importance in any medical context is the relationship between the healthcare practitioner and the patient. The duty of a physician is to adhere to certain principles of medical ethics namely the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. By examining the case study involving Dr. Nancy Morrison, one can observe that these principles are often ambiguous when referring to the issue of whether she committed voluntary active euthanasia or nonvoluntary active euthanasia. Thus, the thesis will aim to exemplify that ultimately Dr. Nancy Morrison was culpable for her actions. To give some context to the issue, Paul Mills was a 65-year-old individual suffering from terminal esophageal cancer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many wonder if euthanasia is right and moral and if it is not what should be done when being faced with this situation. I think the best way to look at physician-assisted euthanasia is through consequentialism and deontology. It’s important we look at the consequences of physician-assisted suicide because they are literally the difference between life and death. A patient that is gravely ill or in a coma may be diagnosed and given a time limit until death, however, some patients have surprised their doctors.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Physicians be allowed to assist in patient suicide? Physician or doctor-assisted suicide has been one of the most debated issues in the last few years. Physician assisted suicide when a doctor supports a fatally sick or immobilized person to take their own life, either by consuming drug or advises on what way to practice to do suicide with. There are many ethical and moral opinions regarding physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Outline for Arguments on PAS and Euthanasia When addressing the matter of Euthanasia and PAS, “we must first acknowledge that figuring out the benefits and harms of permitting euthanasia or PAS is speculative at best” (Emanuel). As well, it is important to acknowledge the fact that, “no matter which social policy regarding euthanasia or PAS is adopted - legalization or maintaining the current policy of permitting them in individual cases - there will be both benefits and harms” (Emanuel). In this argument, it will be shown that legalizing Euthanasia and PAS within the United States, will help people, by allowing terminally ill patients to realize the end of a good death or, more accurately, a create a higher quality dying experience for them.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most importantly, physicians are a part of this decision, which makes this topic a huge concern because it goes against a physician’s integrity, which is why a plethora of ethical concerns arise from physician-assisted suicide. The principle of non-maleficence and the theory of deontology demonstrates why physician-assisted suicide is unethical in the medical world. First, the principle non-maleficence states to avoid all harm. The principle understands that it might be impossible to avoid all harm, but the action taken must at least be good. Secondly, deontologists believe it goes against a doctor’s duty to assist in a patient’s suicide.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ask to Die or Die Happily Course: WRIT 100 Submitted to: Gregory Shupak Submitted by: Mark Anthony Ecal Garcines Due Date: November 9, 2015 “Go Gently” is an article written by Tim Falconer. The author argues that human should have the option of how, where and when to die. Tim states, we should honour the request of the terminally ill person. He holds that belief because if a person repeatedly ask to die, we should respect the individual’s circumstances.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    After examining all the relevant argument surrounding this topic, it was easy to formulate an opinion supporting voluntary euthanasia in limited circumstances. The contemporary thinker, Peter Singer provides a sound argument that outlines how voluntary euthanasia keeps with the ultimate objective of healthcare. When debating the morality of voluntary euthanasia, it is important to consider why it is morally impermissible to kill a human being. According to Singer, the fact that killing is considered wrong simply because a being is human is not a strong enough reason for it to morally wrong in all situations. This idea that human life is intrinsically valuable stems from religious ideals and is commonly defended using deontology (Singer, “Voluntary” 528).…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The following paper argues in favor of Aristotle’s virtue ethics over Kantian deontology. In Kantian deontology, to be ethical is to follow one’s duty by acting on only the rules which one can at the same time rationally will that those actions become universal laws, while in Aristotelian virtue ethics, to be ethical is to develop and internalize virtuous habits until one fully becomes virtuous themselves. In turn, the ethical question of ‘What should I do?’ that deontology asks becomes ‘What should I be?’ with virtue ethics, placing emphasis on internal motivations rather than external actions.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In healthcare, saving one’s life is as equally important as supporting them in their death. Death is a natural part of one’s life and frequently occurs in the healthcare world. The realization of death as a part of health care has brought about several resources that assist patients with the dying process. Hospice and Palliative Care are two resources that are particularly useful when a patient nears the end of life. However, some patients choose to not use these resources and instead pursue a path of ending their life.…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    No person should have to endure terminal suffering that is unremitting, unbearable, or prolonged. When the burdens of life outweigh the benefits because of uncontrollable pain, severe psychological suffering, loss of dignity, or loss of quality of life as judged by the patient, and when the circumstances are not remediable, the dying person should be able to ask for and receive help in assisted suicide (Marker, Smith 47-51). It is further argued that assisted suicide for incurably ill persons experiencing extreme suffering can be distinguished from euthanasia used for the purpose of genocide on the grounds that it is based on principles of dignity, honor, and respect and is chosen and enacted by the dying individuals, rather than being forced on them against their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death and pain have long captured the mind of humanity. Although we have yet to conquer death, we can choose the manner in which we die, potentially avoiding the pain that often mars the end of our lives. However, many find the thought of ending a life before its time to be morally objectionable regardless of the circumstances, and the controversy surrounding euthanasia has been hotly debated since the times of ancient Greece (Kyriaki 98). Although there are exceptions, in most cases, passive euthanasia (allowing a natural death to occur) is considered morally acceptable over active euthanasia in spite of the suffering it often entails, this observation is demonstrated by the legal status of passive and active euthanasia globally. There are…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays