Kantian Ethics: Kant's Condition

Decent Essays
Issue: What should Ebony do about her situation in knowing Luke’s condition?

Immanuel Kant ethical theory is called Kantianism and the type of theory that it falls under is non-consequential. Non-consequential theories are based on moral factors rather than the outcome of the results. Therefore, Kantian ethics is based on doing the right thing on coming up with a solution or action. Kant’s theory is also based on moral autonomy, which is self-ruled and categorical imperative, which is like a moral duty. In order to be a Kantian solution, the solution must pass two tests, which are universality and respect for persons. Kant’s principle of universality is an attempt to eliminate inconsistencies and contradictions, allowing the belief that humans should always act according to the same principles and standards.
…show more content…
When the options that are presented passed through the two tests, the remaining options are consider as an ethical action.

Applying Kant’s Theory to Case 11

1. Consider all possible optional actions.
Ebony possible options are:
1. Ebony could tell Tamara about Luke’s condition
2. Ebony could keep Luke’s condition a secret
3. Ebony could talk to Luke and convince him to tell Tamara about his condition a
4. Ebony could tell Tamara to stay away from Luke

2. Apply universality. Eliminate all options that could not logically be moral standards for everyone.
Kant’s principle of universality is that people should act how they would like others to act. Since this theory is non-consequential it is base on the morality rather than the results of outcome. Therefore, in applying universality to Ebony’s options,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    You are not allowed to make exceptions for yourself. For example, if you expect other people to keep their promises, then you are obligated to keep your own promises. If we apply Kant’s theory in social terms, it emphasizes on the respect for the person because each person has moral dignity. Therefore, no person could exclusively treat another as a means to his/her own end. One must make the right decisions for the right reasons.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my paper I will be discussing that Kantian Ethics can make decide to do the wrong thing sometimes because of Kant’s maxims, his view on good will and also and also will be discussing the FEI and treating humanity merely as a means, also will be discussing his views on reason vs. desire. With these reasons come objections can refute his belief by stating good points, this objection is the murderer at the door. Even though there are objection to Kantian ethics I will respond to these objections in such a way that Kant would respond to anyone with these objections. Therefore because of Kant’s maxims, his views on good will and also using his ideas on using a person merely as means and also the FEI and his views on reason vs. desire.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An Exploration of Othello: Delving into the Mind Frame of Desdemona and Iago Immanuel Kant’s view on ethics and morality is that in order to determine if we are acting in a fashion that can be deemed moral, we have not only a duty to ourselves but others. It is duty that determines our actions. Kant establishes certain limitations and restrictions upon the notion of duty, narrowing down a definition which would allow us to therefore be able to readily distinguish “whether the action which agrees with duty is done from duty, or from a selfish view” (Kant 2). In order to figure out whether our actions correspond to this concept of duty, Kant has established what is known as the categorical imperative which states that you should reflect upon your actions and be comfortable with them becoming a universal law. Insofar as duty is concerned, if we follow this principle it allows for a broader understanding of what is meant by moral and ethical behaviour.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kantian Ethics theory is the deontological theory that will be utilized in dilemma mentioned above. Immanuel Kant argues that one should base morality on proper duty and proper motive. Kant has two major formulations to his theory, “Act only on that maxim that you can will as a universal law… [and] Always treat humanity, whether in your own person or that or another, never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end.” (MacKinnon, p. 116, 2001).…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    mmanuil Kant is one of the most famous figure in the whole history of philosophy. His works inspired many generations of thinkers, some argued for, some against, but always with Kant’s philosophy in their mind. Huge influence of Kant is linked to careful and deliberate analysis of the subjects he explored. Subjects, that are so important in life of every individual, such as moral and ethics. “Grounding for the Metaphysics of Moral” gives perfect insight on Kant’s philosophy.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals” Immanuel Kant explores pure good will concepts as they relate to moral experiences. However I will only be using section I of Kant’s paper as it relates to duty and good will. I will be examining Kant’s argument of “conformity with duty” as it relates to pure goodwill. Kant argues that people believe that they are bound by the categorical imperative, which is an unconditional moral obligation that is not dependent on a person's purpose. That is, ordinary common sense comprises a commitment to the categorical imperative.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant's Moral Obligation

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    My purpose in this essay is to explain and evaluate the first formulation of the Categorical Imperative. According to this formulation, whenever someone considers performing an action, it must be something that they would will or accept that all others do. While this formulation does have its advantages, such as that it provides justice for everyone, overall, I do not find this formulation plausible. Since every situation is different, it makes it hard to have universal rules.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant is one of the greatest philosophers who lived in the 18th century. Brought up in a family of staunch Protestants, Kant lost his father at an early age when he just enrolled into campus, which nurtured his responsibility. The philosopher’s accounts on imperatives are clearly outlined in his work of “The Groundwork of Metaphysics of Morals.” Several critics have had the perception of “absolute” morality; thinking that situations do not bear what ought to be done (Kant, Gregor and Timmerman). Some critics also feel that Kant was an absolutist in the sense of morality, an assertion that might not be ruled out.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant is a firm believer of duty based ethics, meaning that one’s morality is defined by ones motives. Thus, Kant believes that an action should be performed simply because it’s the right thing to do, and for no other reason. Also, Kant states that duty defines intrinsic value, meaning that a person’s motives for what they do should have ends within themselves, without consequences or desired satisfaction being built into their actions. Kant also states the one should act so that the maximum of your action can and should be made into universal law, expressing that the actions of your motives should apply to everyone in the same way. Thus, bringing us to the fact that action from duty has to be an categorical imperative, meaning that everyone should and would be able to act the same way, sharing equal positioning.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This principle states that an action is morally acceptable only if it’s maxim is universalizable. There are three main steps to this principle: 1) formulate maxim, 2) imagine a world where everyone acts on it, 3) ask whether the action would be achievable in that world. If yes, the action is permissible. This shows a key difference between the principle of utility, as an action isn’t required with Kant, they’re merely acceptable. The next underlying principle with Kant’s theory is the principle of humanity.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person. A key factor relating to Kant’s theory, is that an individual may not interfere with another’s’ goals or objectives that a person may have. In addition, Kant discusses the moral rules that all autonomous and rational…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Importance Of Deontology

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What does Kant call the highest principle that should govern all human…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays