Immanuel Kant's Ideas Of Good Will And Duty

Improved Essays
In the paper I argue that the act of stealing bread for survival of your family is morally unjust based on Kantian ethics, the contradiction between actions lacks the ability for the person to act based on duty, good will, and the moral law. As the basis of my argument, I will reference the work of Immanuel Kant and his theoretical development of the categorical imperative, furthermore, by implementing Kant’s ideas of good will and duty, it will become clear that Kantian ethics withholds a strict rule over the moral reasoning and actions of the individual in a social world. In the beginning sections of this paper I will briefly describe the basics of Kantian ethics, in particular, the categorical imperative and it three main formations, universality, …show more content…
The rational of his choice do not coincide with moral law or maxim of societal law, moreover, Valjean’s actions were not based on reason, since a rational actor would know to act based on the categorical imperative rather than acting on inclination or the self ***. Therefore, **Jean Valjean is struck with a contradiction within his own moral duties, for instance, as a father Jean has a duty and obligation to provide for his family and his children, however, he is also contradicted with the duty and obligation to follow the law. Based on the categorical imperative, Kantian ethics will argue that if Valjean is to act on reason and maxims than he is to follow state laws rather than feed his children. Valjean is contradicted with a conflict of duties, a duty to both his family and to his state, state laws to Kant represent a perfect duty, whereas, feeding his family represents an imperfect duty***. Meaning, the perfect duty represents an action that is morally just and universalized as being right, for instance state laws. Conversely, an imperfect duty is based on the inclination to act based on subjectivity, therefore the action does not conform to the categorical imperative and the three formulas, as discussed above. Consequently, when contradicted with two conflicts of duty the reason within the agent must act based on the perfect duty, which is the duty to follow state

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this case, Harriet is stuck between a dilemma of choosing who to save and she chooses to save the individual that is inherently more valuable. This paper supports Harriet’s decision by using Kantian ethics such as Kant’s theory on moral praise, Kant’s theory on imperfect duties, and finally by Kant’s formulation analysis of a categorical imperative. I will use Kantian ethics to support why Harriet deserves moral praise. After supporting why Harriet deserves moral praise I will briefly discuss the arguments against why Harriet does not deserve moral praise under Kantian ethics.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Immanuel Kant’s, “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals”, the morality of action is questioned, defined, and explained. To do so, Kant brings up an example of several people, two of which either, “preserve their lives”, or, “act charitably” out of pure, “natural inclination” (Kant). The other two are performing the same actions, but, in stark contrast to the other two individuals, are acting because of a, “motive of duty”, or maxim (Kant). Kant explains that those who acted out of duty are only deserving of moral status for their actions, and those who acted out of impulse do not. After much deliberation, I have agreed with Kant’s perspective of what comprises a moral action.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant supports the categorical imperative with three different rules, all of which convince me that we have moral duties to ourselves because these rules are in a sense applicable to everyday life. The three rules include the universal law, treat humans as ends in themselves, and act as if you live in the Kingdom of ends. Universal law is discussed first where Kant states, “There is only one categorical imperative. It is an act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Chapter 5 Sandel introduces us to the philosopher Immanuel Kant. This chapter talks focuses on Kant’s view on motive such as: What is the Supreme principle of morality and what is human freedom? Kant believes that morality is based on universal law. Kant calls this act categorical imperative. The idea is that you should treat everyone how everyone would want to be treated.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant argues that duty is based solely on reason (Kant,81). Kant believes that the act of lying, murdering, robbery are the wrong action and we have a duty not to do these things. According to Kant, consequences are not what makes an act right, but the right action makes the act right. Also, our good motives or intentions will lead us to the good path without qualification. The Categorical Imperative is the supreme principle of morality.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An Exploration of Othello: Delving into the Mind Frame of Desdemona and Iago Immanuel Kant’s view on ethics and morality is that in order to determine if we are acting in a fashion that can be deemed moral, we have not only a duty to ourselves but others. It is duty that determines our actions. Kant establishes certain limitations and restrictions upon the notion of duty, narrowing down a definition which would allow us to therefore be able to readily distinguish “whether the action which agrees with duty is done from duty, or from a selfish view” (Kant 2). In order to figure out whether our actions correspond to this concept of duty, Kant has established what is known as the categorical imperative which states that you should reflect upon your actions and be comfortable with them becoming a universal law. Insofar as duty is concerned, if we follow this principle it allows for a broader understanding of what is meant by moral and ethical behaviour.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The duty or obligation in professional environments to do what is right is held at a higher expectation than the morality of individuals in their personal lives. To further explain if a person was at work and they are there because they desired money then they ought to work this is an example of hypothetical imperative. However, to explain categorical imperatives into the workplace if an individual desires money the “action is good in itself and ought to be chosen, regardless of one’s desires and ends.” So choosing to work is not chosen because of an individual's personal desires but rather because it is their duty/obligation to do because it is good. This is acting within a maxim which in Kant’s perspective is the only way in which one should act, because to do the right thing is done only for the reason that it is…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Kant

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    And, to act out of respect for the Moral Law is to do the right thing because it is the right. Again, what Kant thinks is important from the moral point of view is the motive of the agent. To see how motive is important to Kant (and to see what it means to say that one is acting from duty), it is useful to look at the various ways one can act in accordance with duty (and thus perform the right action).…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant strongly believed that humans each have moral freedom. “Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) argued that moral requirements are based on a standard of rationality he dubbed the ‘Categorical Imperative’ (CI)” (Johnson). Moreover, Kant divides ethics into…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Immanuel Kant’s writing “The Good Will” he claims that actions that are performed in conformity with duty are not truly moral, and they are not done just for the sake of duty alone. It is actually quite difficult to think of an action that is done purely for the duty itself. Kant states that most actions are done simply out of interest or an inclination to do something in order to reach another motive, rather than doing a task for the sake of duty. If that is true, it is virtually impossible to act from duty. This idea is similar to the theory of psychological egoism, in that the ultimate goal of any action is to satisfy self-interest.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences, but on whether the moral reason is “from duty”. Actions done “in conformity with duty” or out of self-interest, have no moral worth to Kant. Duty is defined as an individual’s rational understanding of the action their pursuing. This relates to an action’s maxim, which is what you’re doing and why you’re doing it. Two main principles are used to further Kant’s theory, one being the principle of universalizability.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy “The field of ethics (or moral philosophy) involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior,” (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). We have learned throughout this class that ethics is a moral value that differs from person to person but what makes up ethics? Ethical theories are a huge part of ethics; however, many of the theories differ in more than one way. In this essay two theories will be focused on and outlined, those theories being, ethical egoism and Kant’s theory of good will. In the outline regarding these theories I will cover the strengths of both theories, what type of dilemmas the theories can cover and lastly there will be some criticism…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A categorical imperative is an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person’s inclination. It provides us with a way to evaluate whether an action is moral or not. There are three formulations to test a categorical imperative: the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), the Formula of the Law of Nature (FLN), and the Formula of Humanity as an End. The first formulation tests to see if a universalized maxim contradicts itself, and thus, cannot be universalized as a basis of action without causing confusion. The second formulation asks if an individual would choose to live in a world where the universalized maxim is followed at all times.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the movie My Sister’s Keeper, Sara and Brian Breslin make the decision to conceive their daughter Ana through in vitro to donate compatible organs to their daughter Kate who suffers from acute promyelocytic leukemia. The ethical issue in this movie is the decision Ana’s parents made to go through with genetic pre-implementation with the specific goal of saving their older daughter Kate. The moral agent, Ana, faces moral obligations to save her sister by serving as an organ bank. She is at the center of an ethical dilemma as she has to decide what is best for her and her family.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays