Kant Vs Aristotle Analysis

Improved Essays
Kant believed that a good will truly comes from within one’s own self. This does not mean that we need to deny his mentality, his spiritual makeup, the constitution of his personality, or in essence, his soul, however, it does mean that we ought to deny the part of him that is the root cause of all of his pain and anguish: his ego and we do this through self-restraint and one’s will power. This contrasts Aristotle’s view because it suggests that a man pursuing excellence in his rational activities may not be indicative of a good will. Man’s habitual egotism is importantly noted amongst those who adhere to Kant’s work, as it is viewed as a negative criterion of being human. The objective, therefore, is to dismantle the temporary object of affection

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Steven Cahn’s book, Exploring Ethics, we learn about many philosophers and their approach on ethics. Ethics is considered to be the moral principles that govern a person 's or group 's behavior. (Wikipedia) Cahn takes us in to the approaches by Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mills, Aristotle and Virginia Held. Each philosopher had a very different view on morals and how we should approach them but we also find similarities throughout their views. Immanuel Kant believes that good will is defined by duty.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will defend psychological egoism as the most probable explanation for moral choice and motivation. I hold psychological egoism to be “the view that all men are selfish in everything that they do, that is, that the only motive from which anyone ever acts is self-interest” (Rachels 233). Since every action is moved by a desire to be satisfied, even in supposedly altruistic acts, one acts on a desire to satisfy one’s desire, so that supposedly altruistic acts are not actually altruistic. James Rachels, to whom my defining of psychological egoism is attributed, counters psychological egoism as incorrect moral skepticism. In the form of a Platonic dialogue, I will present, if successful, the impossibility for any ‘moral’ conduct beyond psychological egoism, counteracting Rachels own refutation in his essay, “Egoism and Moral Scepticism.”…

    • 2217 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The following points of similarities are constructed upon their scientific and philosophical theories. For instance, Aristotle’s virtue of justice has a close similarity to Kant’s perfect duties to self and others and Aristotle’s virtues that he lists has a rough correspondence in line with Kant’s imperfect duties to self and others. Therefore, the recommended way of living life of Aristotle and Kant, is fairly similar. Furthermore, Aristotle and Kant argued the point that emotions are subjective and cannot be useful in making moral claims, which lead them both to conclude that reason and logic are the way to understand the moral world. In most cases, Aristotle and Kant viewed the morality of an individual is determined by the action and not the consequences of the action.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my paper I will be discussing that Kantian Ethics can make decide to do the wrong thing sometimes because of Kant’s maxims, his view on good will and also and also will be discussing the FEI and treating humanity merely as a means, also will be discussing his views on reason vs. desire. With these reasons come objections can refute his belief by stating good points, this objection is the murderer at the door. Even though there are objection to Kantian ethics I will respond to these objections in such a way that Kant would respond to anyone with these objections. Therefore because of Kant’s maxims, his views on good will and also using his ideas on using a person merely as means and also the FEI and his views on reason vs. desire.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I argue virtue in Nicomachean Ethics does not focus on the individual as a subjective being, and that the call for subjective individuals to characterize their life around objective, universal virtue implies individuals should seek to be beyond themselves. Aristotle holds the position that for humans to develop their nature – toward reason, toward moral virtue – they must engage socially, politically, and culturally. The cultivation of practical wisdom as not blind habituation, but a developed and reflective disposition to the morally virtuous, seems to imply a human being freed from dependent habit and, thus, finally autonomous. However, I argue against this inference, that individuals characterized by Nicomachean Ethics are not of free will and it is their own human nature that determines choice. Choice, to Aristotle, is not possible without pre-existing dispositions that deliberate; choices are external manifestations of disposition.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will argue that Mencius’ altruistic position and four dispositions offer more precise explanations of human motivation than Glaucon’s support of psychological egoism. I contend that humans all have the capacity to partake in moral acts (e.g., helping kin and others, altruism, combatting injustice, etc.). Glaucon’s defense of psychologically egoistic motivation is only useful to recognize that human beings harbor a degree of self-preservation (i.e., to guard oneself from harm and fatality). I will first describe both Glaucon and Mencius’ assertions and the examples they used to substantiate their claims. Second, I will discuss how their fundamental concepts differ.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A good will or moral will determine intention which causes actions that lead to the consequences one receives from those actions. One example given by Kant is a man who has fallen into despair after many misfortunes have crossed his path. This man believes that the only way to free himself and finally be happy is to commit suicide. In his mind, this is a symbol of self-love towards himself.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What we ought to do, or what we must do, is determined by morality which employs us to fulfill duties that otherwise would be wrong not to fulfill. But in Immanuel Kant’s Chapter Two of the “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals”, he argues the existence of autonomy and how we can choose for ourselves what we ought to do that is vital for morality. Kant claims, “The word ‘respect’ is the only suitable expression for the esteem that a rational being must necessarily feel for such lawgiving. Autonomy is thus the basis of the dignity of human nature and of every rational nature” (336). Autonomy simply put is the ability to freely live your own life based on reasons and motives that are followed by your own choices, not the choices and influences of others (339).…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals, and Mill’s Utilitarianism, each offer different arguments about what is morality. They both give us fundamental and universal theories about morality. Before we compare the two, let’s first start with a summary of the main arguments of each philosopher. Mill begins chapter one by setting the stage for what he is going to discuss. Philosophers have discussed the foundation of morality for more than two thousand years.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Kant’s essay, he argues that the immaturity a person might have is brought upon themselves not because one does not want to understand. He argues that we are afraid to break free from the norm and think for ourselves. He believes that the saying of enlightenment is to “have the courage to use your own understanding.” (Kant 54) Kant defines enlightenment as “enlightenment is a man’s emergence from his self-incurred immaturity” (54) I believe that Kant defines enlightenment this way because he believes that people should think on their own and create their own ideas.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy “The field of ethics (or moral philosophy) involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior,” (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy). We have learned throughout this class that ethics is a moral value that differs from person to person but what makes up ethics? Ethical theories are a huge part of ethics; however, many of the theories differ in more than one way. In this essay two theories will be focused on and outlined, those theories being, ethical egoism and Kant’s theory of good will. In the outline regarding these theories I will cover the strengths of both theories, what type of dilemmas the theories can cover and lastly there will be some criticism…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant and Aristotle have similarities and differences when it comes to their ethical theories. Both men believed in logically understanding what was right and moral, but just in different ways. Kant mainly focused on Humans being ends rather than the means to achieving the happiest life possible. Aristotle focused on the “Golden Mean” between emotion and action. Using Sandal’s “Jumping the Queue” and “Markets in Life and Death”, Kant and Aristotle ‘s similarities and differences will become more evident.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics IX.8: Self-love and Selfishness Text: §1 (1168a29-35) “§1 There is also a puzzle about whether one ought to love oneself or someone else most of all; for those who like themselves most are criticized and denounced as self-lovers, as though this were something shameful. Indeed, the base person seems to go to every length for his own sake, and all the more the more vicious he is; hence he is accused…of doing nothing [for any end apart] from himself. The decent person, on the contrary, acts for what is fine, all the more the better he is, and for his friend’s sake, disregarding his own [interest].” Commentary: §1 Who should humans love most: (1) themselves, or (2) others?…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In recent events, James Liang, an employee of 30 years for Volkswagen, came forward admitting to using software to deceive emissions tests in the United States for Volkswagen’s diesel engines. The engines, on average, produce 40 times the legal limits on emissions. After undergoing investigation, it was found that Volkswagen had been involved in this scandal since 2006. In response to public outcry the company has recalled all models using this engine and set aside 16 billion dollars to fix their mistake. However, for Liang after admitting his guilt, he intends to help bring others responsible for the scandal to light.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays