Similarity Between Kant And John Stuart Mill

992 Words 4 Pages
The similarity between the philosophers Kant and Mill is the base of morality on a single principle. Kant principle being the categorical Imperative in three formulas closely related to the golden rule, states that one should always act in accordance with the outcome that has the best outcome, Mil is utility. Mill argues that human principle of morality is that one can will to be a universal law of nature, Mill principle proposes the consideration of the case of kind actions for all human and creatures. Mill makes it known that individuals desire pleasure an Kant believes people should act according to the law of nature.
Mill’s theories that explain morality, argues that the usefulness of the moral worth of an action determined by the utility. on the principle of Utilitarianism strongly believes in happiness and pleasure derived from the consequence of one action, the
…show more content…
Kant believes that there is a principle of morality, and he refers it to the categorical imperative. Act in such way that you treat humanity merely to the mean to an end, but always at the end. All action should not only be as a principle but also an end. Mill claim that, in the state of the greatest happiness principle the consequence end to produce happiness and doing eon in the proportion of unhappiness. Morally good act are consequence in the fulfillment of happiness in people. Both philosopher are appealing to a consequence of the first principle and to the end of duties, Kant considers the consequence of maxim becoming a universal law of nature, and Mill consequence of his principle is a certain kind of action (ex, lying). In also pursuing happiness in the absence of pain. All human should be good in doing the right thing act in accordance to the maxim and in such way to produce the greatest amount of happiness for everyone affected by our acts in accordance to virtue by treating people like their

Related Documents