Justinian The Great Censorship Quotes

Improved Essays
Justinian used censorship to his advantage to make himself appear better in the public eye. Most reports of his actions were very whitewashed if not false at times. The main historian, Procopius, admitted that his accounts and others didn’t tell the whole story. He kept his true feelings in a separate secret document. As you might of heard on the news, similar situations are happening to many politicians today. The hidden document and the whitewashed one confirms that Justinian the Great was not worthy of his title because of his personality, ruthlessness, and reaction to the Nika riots. Firstly, Justinian the Great is not deserving of his “great” title because of his personality. In Procopius’ secret text, he depicts Justinian’s character explicitly; “For he was at once villainous and amenable… yet easily hoodwinked by any who wanted to deceive him… [Justinian] was …show more content…
Procopius’ secret text describes the very issue; “[Justinian] was too prone to listen to accusations; and too quick to punish. For he decided such cases without full examination, naming the punishment when he had heard only the accuser's side of the matter. Without hesitation he wrote decrees for the plundering of countries, ... I think it would be found that more men had been murdered by this single man than in all previous history.”(1). Ruthlessness may be considered as a good trait for an emperor. Many emperors successfully expanded their borders because of their ruthlessness. However, Justinian displayed the atrocious side of being ruthless. It was stated that he murdered many, however most of these murders were not justified, and in the many pictures illustrate these bloody killings. He would jump the gun on executions, and he would destroy a city for no viable reason. Even though the line that separates the good and bad of ruthlessness is blurred to some, it is completely plain to see that he leaped over

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Name: Maddie Swart Hour: 3 Alexander the Great Alexander The Great is a person that interests numerous historians. Alexander was born in Macedonia in the year 356 BCE and died in 323 BCE. Alexander wanted to conquer the world, and he started with the Middle East and Asia. Alexander led an army of about 40,000 troops across the land.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But besides his brilliant leadership in battle, Plutarch writes of an unselfish side to Alexander where he gives away his riches to his companions, and of having bronze statues made for fallen soldiers after a battle. (page 4) This portrays Alexander as, not only an effective leader, but one that is almost flawless. Although there are those that disagree, Plutarch’s version of Alexander most definitely deserves to be called Alexander the Great.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He even forbade anonymous letters of accusation to be written and sent into the trials. Hadrian also continued these actions (Rodgers and…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, the protagonist of this novel, Guy Montag lives a world where reading books is illegal and firemen are to burn those who own books. Montag is introduced to a girl named Clarisse, she symbolises curiosity. Guy’s wife, Mildred symbolises the ignorance in the world without books. Beatty, Montag’s captain represents the government or rule in their society. Fahrenheit 451 the main theme would be censorship, because the burning of books blocks the mind from imagination and the freedom to think.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rise To Power Dbq

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is said that his temper caused him to do many things he regretted later in life that effected his society. Through his time of reign, he had began to gain higher ranks and granted with more power. In document six, it suggests that the more in command he became, the more unquestioned and powerful. His attitude sparked many different views on him.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great was a villain who knew how to manipulate people into thinking he was the good guy. Alexander had his fair share of good guy moments but overall Alexander used the good side people saw to manipulate them into doing as he wanted. Due to Alexander’s violence and mistreat to the human race he is villain. When Alexander the Great conquered new land he usually treated the people and the land in a cruel and disrespectful manner.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    He portrayed Justinian as someone who would take other people’s wealth and property, all the while killing anyone who go in his way. He furthered this portrayal of Justinian, by going so far as to say that Justinian was a demon in human form. He mentions that a few people had been witness to seeing Justinian change forms (Page104). When talking about Theodora he paints a picture of a lustful harlot who is good at…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, this bit of political correspondence, however of next to no significance in the political history of Rome, is imperative for what it educates us regarding the way early Christians were seen by the experts and about what they did. The letter starts off with Pliny explain…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alexander the Great has been revered as military genius, tactician, and godlike conqueror. Many of the accounts taken down of his life make him out to be the hero of Western culture and practice. The peoples he conquered and the territories he took over worshipped him as a god and even placed him alongside the likes of Zeus and Ra. The main source used to gain knowledge of Alexander’s life stems from historians and philosophers, such as Quintus Curtius, Plutarch, and Arrian. These writers recorded the events that took place in his life as though they shared close ties to Alexander.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A villain is a person who has done many awful things. Alexander the Great was a bad person because he was not able to lead the people in the right way. Putting your culture into life threatening positions at all time would not want people to live in that area. Alexander the Great was a villain because he was really selfish and greedy and destroyed many cultures. Alexander the Great was a villain because he was really selfish and greedy.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An analysis of Socrates’s censorship reveals its merits as well as its many shortcomings and provides valuable evidence of Plato’s own opinion regarding censorship in society. Foremost, Socrates’s censorship efficaciously controls mass ideology through the filtering and editing of certain ideas in literature, implying that Plato himself regards literature as a powerful indoctrinating force and a possible source of threat of dissent to a political regime. Additionally, Socrates provides a convenient definition of “greatest harm” against a city, stating that the “greatest evil-doing against one’s own city is injustice” (Plato 113). Consequently, as injustice is the opposite of justice which regards the “money-making, auxiliary, and guardian classes doing what’s appropriate, each of them minding its own…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Alexander: Fulfilling his Prophecy One Victory at a Time From when Alexander the Great was 18 years old, to when he died, he made many advancements militarily, culturally and in religion when he was in power. Alexander the Great was truly “great” because he had a sense of urgency to spread values and culture. He was a very clever leader in military and outside of military. Using his intelligence, he established more colonies for growth of Ancient Greece. Alexander was also a strong leader because he fulfilled the prophecy of Plato’s philosopher-king attributing to his title.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, questions have arisen about when it is right to kill someone or not. There are usually two sides to this controversy: it is never right to kill someone, or it is better to kill one person and save thousands of lives than to risk the death of thousands of people. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, it can be argued that Caesar truly did deserve to die for various reasons. In Julius Caesar, Caesar deserved his fate because he had many physical weaknesses that held him back, he was too power-hungry and egotistical, and he would have ultimately hurt Rome more than helped it.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The assassination of Julius Caesar was unjustified. It’s unjustified because Caesar was a great leader and lawgiver. Even though Caesar was a leader for his army across the republic in northern Italy, Caesar was taking down the forces for his enemies before he left to Egypt. He already had a plan when he left for Egypt. Julius Caesar was a good man.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A tragic hero is a character who develops an action that leads to a tragic flaw and can cause their fault. Brutus, in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, is a tragic character because he posses the flaw of being naive and has poor judgement. A tragedy is dealing with tragic events and having an unhappy ending, especially one concerning the downfall of the main character. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, takes place in ancient Rome where there is a celebration being held in honor of Julius Caesar for defeating Pompey.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays