Justinian And The Bubonic Plague: Causes Of The Pandemics

Superior Essays
would leave everything to the empire, and some had even accused Justinian of committing murder in order to get the funds necessary to fuel his dream (Cassel, 2007). Using these rather slippery ways of getting the money, Justinian began to gain enemies, and it wouldn’t be soon after that a rebellion would threaten his reign over the empire (Brooks, 2009).

With such behavior, it didn’t take long for the empire to retaliate, causing the Nika Revolt on January 13th, 532 AD. The whole city of Constantinople rose up and tried to upheave the Byzantine government. As Justinian was forced into his palace by the rioter, they began to plan their military coup, going as far as deciding on a new emperor. In that time Justinian had made the decision
…show more content…
As described by the historian Thomas Martin, “This one was truly terrifying. 25 to 50% of the population, at least in urban areas like Constantinople, was killed. Ten people, five of them are gone. Think of that. What that would mean in life if half of the people you know today were dead tomorrow (Cassel, 2007).” Justinian’s plague would affect more than half of Europe, including the emperor himself. Symptoms included the victim 's suffering from delusions, nightmares, fevers, and swellings in the groin, armpits, and behind their ears. The lucky sufferers fell into comas. The victims that didn’t fall into comas however became severely delusional and often suffered for days before death. However other more lucky victims died almost immediately after the beginning of symptoms. Many people in Justinian’s empire laid the blame for the outbreak on the emperor, declaring him to be a devil or that the emperor himself was being punished at the hands of God for his wrongdoings. When wall was said and done, at least 50 million people were taken out of Constantinople due to the Plague of Justinian (Horgan, 2014).

After Justinian’s death in 565 AD, the future of Europe went from bleak to pitch black. As soon as Justinian died, the Byzantine Empire had realised that they simply could not fund the land it
…show more content…
Many things were very interesting and I can honestly say I enjoyed researching this topic. However, despite all the things I learned, there are more things I wish to learn more about. I probably could have written at least a 20 page paper on this topic alone if I had covered every aspect of the Dark Ages themselves. To be completely honest, I could have easily just written this on the fall of Rome itself and the many factors that contributed to it. That is something I would have liked to dig deeper into, the causes of the fall and the events leading up to it. Another thing I wish I could’ve looked deeper into was the Plague of Justinian. I had no idea the Black Plague was technically split into three parts and I would like to see more about the symptoms and how they went about treating

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The new emperor attempted to give away the church of the Byzantine people to Rome, but the move faced great resistance, resulting to the strangling of Alexius in 1204 after a palace coup. The death of Alexius prompted the Franks to declare war on the Constantinople, bring the fourth crusade to an end with looting in the capital of Byzantine.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In conclusion, the Roman Empire was a diverse nation with diverse leaders. Both Augustus and Constantine were powerful leaders, who had different approaches to try to save the empire. Through political, social, and spiritual reforms, the empire grew and fell. While both men were deemed “Augusti”, the most efficient Augusti was Constantine. He removed the fear of being persecuted for one’s religion with the Edict of Milan, and moved the capital of the empire to a more central…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Watts states that one of the most fundamental political ideas of the middle ages was the concept of the Roman Empire. Although the ancient empire of Rome was long past its glory, Watts maintains that “it had suited almost every succeeding regime across the Mediterranean and beyond to adopt some at least of what it understood to be the rights, rituals and accoutrements of imperial power, and to insist on some kind of continuity with the Roman imperial tradition”. Rome, as a concept and an idea, was the bedrock of almost every formal political structure in medieval Europe. The Holy Roman Empire was arguably the epitome of this political practice. These imperialist doctrines were, to borrow a phrase from J.V. Bryce, “set forth most strikingly”…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bubonic Plague Dbq

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Bubonic plague was a horrific time in history. The Plague took Europe by storm. It started December 31st, 1347(Source: Plague Map). People were dying all throughout Europe. Just about 23 million died between the years 1345 and 1400(Source: http://www.hyw.com/books/history/Black_De.htm) . The physicians at the time died or they would over price just to inspect the ill. People abandoned their families and let the die alone. (Source: Marchione di Coppo). Everyone accusing innocent people for the plague and even went as far as to burn down their homes (Source: Adapted from http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/jewish/1348-jewsblackdeath.html). It was truly a sad time.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    to Nicomedia so he could show himself to the emperor Diocletian where he soon became a…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bubonic Plague DBQ

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In document 2 it talks about how harsh the symptoms were. The people with the plague had buboes. These people that were affected also caught a fever. The people also got dark spots all over their body. There were no known treatments for the plague.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The diptych of Justinian depicts him as the triumphant emperor, possibly after concluding a peace treaty with the Persians in 532. Justinian the Great, as he was also known,…

    • 1602 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Diocletian’s reign ended in 315 AD, there was a fight for imperial power over the Roman Empire. Diocletian had created a tetrarchy, but now the men fighting for the imperial office wanted to have sole power of the empire instead of having other men rule with him. Constantine the Great and Maxentius would turn out to be the main attackers for the position. Maxentius had power over Italy from defeating Galerius, and Constantine had control over the upper Roman Empire of Gaul and Britain. Unfortunately, Constantine was the brother-in-law of Maxentius, but this did not stop them from being top enemies during the civil war for power. Both sons of imperial power, they felt left out because they were not appointed to power. With Constantine’s approximately 100 thousand troops against Maxentius’ 75-120 thousand soldiers, Constantine decided to attack Maxentius in Rome and gain the title of emperor. Maxentius ordered men to come up from Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily, and the African provinces for…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Procopius focuses a lot on who is in charge and how they handle the power given to them. When talking about Belisarius and Antonina, he focuses his attention on how they rule with their emotions. You can really see this in the way both Belisarius and Antonina handle their jealousy. Belisarius’s jealousy can be seen in the way that he goes after his stepson and wife’s lover, Theodosius. Once he is told of what has been going on, he orders his men to get rid of Theodosius (Page43). However, Belisarius was known to have mood swings and to command his followers on a whim. His men knowing this did not follow through with the order to get rid of Theodosius (Page43). They are also many examples of Antonina acting and reacting out of emotion, and how these reaction affect those around her. One such example can be seen after Belisarius tried to get rid of Theodosius. When she heard that Constantine had said, “If I’d been in your shoes, I should have got rid of the woman rather than the youngster” (Page43) she reacted out of emotion. She was able to hold on to her dislike of Constantine until the right moment. Once Antonina was able to convince her husband that she did nothing wrong, she was able to get her revenge on Constantine. She did this by cutting out his tongue and throwing it to sea, and then later convincing her husband to kill him (Page44). To continue on, there are also many different example of how Justinian and Theodora mistreated the people under their rule. He portrayed Justinian as someone who would take other people’s wealth and property, all the while killing anyone who go in his way. He furthered this portrayal of Justinian, by going so far as to say that Justinian was a demon in human form. He mentions that a few people had been witness to seeing Justinian change forms (Page104). When talking about Theodora he paints a picture of a lustful harlot who is good at…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Eastern and Western Rome were united, Rome completely surrounded the Mediterranean Sea. Therefore, it was called the “Roman Lake” because the sea paled in comparison to the mighty empire. When the empire split and Western Rome fell, barbarians poured across the border and took over all the land that used to belong to the great empire. Justinian’s greatest desire was to restore Rome to its former glory, and reclaim the land he thought belonged to the Byzantine Empire. He sent his generals, Belisarius and Narses, on a campaign to reclaim the land. They reconquered the Vandals in North Africa (a barbarian tribe so brutal, they’re name is the origin of vandalism,) and the Ostrogoths in Italy. Also, conquering the barbarians caused needed money and wealth to flow into the Byzantine Empire. Under Justinian, the Byzantine Empire reached its peak in land…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Emperor that I have chosen for this essay is Constantine. Constantine ruled the…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As my son matured, he began to feel some reluctance towards my influence on the empire. Constantine knew he had no chance to seize power because I told the military to take an oath of fidelity to me. The army viewed me as a senior ruler. Not only my did my son not like my influence on the empire in 790 the themes of Asia Minor grew resistant towards me as well. These actions resulted in my son being named sole ruler and he banished me from court. But two years later I was allowed to come back to court and be co-emperor again. With the help of bishops and courtiers I organized a scheme against my son. I had him arrested and blinded for banishing me.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He modernized the empires architecture, military, and legal system. Justinian, with his wife Theodosia says, “we have decided now to grant to the world, with the help of Almighty God”, proclaiming his Christian beliefs and his path he chooses to rule in. He helps to make Christianity safe and popular during his reign. Justinian being a Christian, bases his laws, and essentially his empire, around his moral and spiritual beliefs.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During Caligula’s short term rule he managed to become one of Rome’s most hated emperors. To most of Rome’s citizens they considered Caligula as psychotic…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    These distinctions are reflected in the conversation between Liutprand and Nicephorus. In particular, Liutprand says that the Byzantine Emperors cannot be viewed as the true rulers of Rome. To support this claim, he mentions that easterners failed to punish the corrupt and impious “tyrants” of Rome who sent scornful letters to the Byzantine Emperors (Liutprand). By contrast, Otto succeeded in freeing Rome of such rulers. To some degree, Liutprand’s response exemplifies his opinions about the authority of Nicephorus and Otto. In particular, he thinks that Nicephorus can exercise his authority over certain lands only by relying on the century-old tradition and the former power of the Byzantine Empire. Nevertheless, he is not longer able to respond to new threats. Therefore, his power is very weak. At the same time, the authority of Otto is based on his ability to use military force in order to meet potential challenges or punish injustice. Hence, in his opinion, Otto is a more efficient ruler. In their turn, Nicephorus and his courtiers believe that they are the only heirs of the Roman Empire. Hence, their authority cannot be questioned by any European monarch. More importantly, from their perspective, Otto I or any other European king lacks legitimacy and has no right to…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays