Agamemnon to penalise the sacrifice of Iphigeneia in accordance with the ethic of revenge, the brutal code of revenge killing that demanded that a personality's murder be penalise in a similar way by his/her shut relative. It conjointly immersed torment at the hands of the Furies, feminine divinities of a terrible hair-raising side, for anyone United Nations agency dead a detailed relative. within the second play, The Libation Bearers, mythical being kills Clytaemnestra to penalise the murder of Agamemnon. This act continues to be keep with the …show more content…
the only purpose of the previous revenge ethic was to defend the holiness of the filial bond, clearly declared by the Furies after they catch up with mythical being at Athena's shrine: "Every mortal United Nations agency incensed god or guest or taken with parent: / every receives the pain his pains exact" (E 269-70). Clytaemnestra doesn't invite the wrath of the Furies for killing Agamemnon, for" that murder wouldn't destroy one's flesh and blood" (E 210). Orestes, on the opposite hand, is unrelentingly pursued by these ancient deities, United Nations agency can stop only if he's created to pay "agony / for mother-killing agony" (E 266-67). so the previous order, tho' it perpetuated endless violence and bloodshed, conjointly upheld the mother's or the daughter's rights, even over those of the husband's. The Furies United Nations agency command over this order ar subservient to no alternative god, for, as they claim, "The Fates United Nations agency gave U.S. power created U.S. free" (E 352). they're roused to action by matricide however stay indifferent to the killing of a husband by his better half. However, once this state of affairs, "where justice and bloody slaughter ar the same" (E 184) provides thanks to a a lot of evolved style of justice culminating within the trial at the areopagus, the forces of social