Justice In Plato's The Republic

Improved Essays
The idea of justice is one that generally most people will agree on but almost no one can explain why. In The Republic by Plato, Socrates tries to come up with a way to find true justice. After making his argument, it is inferred that Plato takes over the argument but continues to use Socrates as a mouth piece. To help in understanding an analogy is created and although it seems reasonable at first, it is not. Plato tries his best to have his line of reasoning flawless, nonetheless it has flaws. His ideology along with his analogy are flawed which consecutively means that justice is not how he makes it out to be. Justice comes into play in a conversation between Cephalus, an older man who is an archetype of Athens at the time, and Socrates, …show more content…
Socrates comes up with his utopia that is based on simplicity. He gives the citizens of his city only the necessities: water, food, shelter, and medicine. Adeimantus, Glaucon’s brother, argues that people are not content with simplicity and that they desire luxuries. This city then becomes the Repurified City, a city with more trades that are not necessary for survival. More farmer are added because of the increase in population, more land is added for the farmers, and warriors are added due to the increase need for land. They also start establishing the fundamentals and ideals of the city and how they will educate/raise the people in order for all of them to work together in harmony. It is agreed that the people will be told that they all have different metals in their veins. Some will be told that they have gold, others silver, and others bronze/iron. Gold belongs to the rulers, silver to the guardians, and bronze/iron to the workers. The workers will only be allowed to be work in one specific field and so will their children, the guardians will get an education in philosophy and will be physically trained and will be able to be guardians or upgrade to gold if they pass tests, and the rulers will be philosopher kings. The iron class will only be educated in their field and will have to be moderate in order for the city to work well. Those in the silver class will mainly be taught philosophy and physical training and will have to be moderate and courageous. However, they will learn censored myths because if they read stories on cowardly and selfish gods they are more likely to imitate their actions and start to think of themselves as individuals rather than part of the city. Rulers are going to make sure the laws and people are just and with them being philosophers it is concluded that they will rule wisely. As for reproduction, the lower class can decide for themselves while in the higher class their partners are decided by a

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In this speech, Thrasymachus tells him that he thinks about rulers differently than sheep or cattle and whether it is advantageous for them (343b). “You are so far from understanding justice and what is just, and injustice and what is unjust, that you do not realize that justice is really the good of another, what is advantageous for the stronger and ruler, and harmful to the one who obeys and serves (343c).” Next, the son of Cephalus says that “...injustice rules the simpleminded…” (343c5). A just man, to Thrasymachus always gets less than the unjust one (343d). He continues on to say that injustice is better than justice (344c5-8).…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While attempting to find the correct meaning of the word justice, Socrates refutes several of Thrasymachus's arguments pertaining to his personal perception of the definition. Furthermore, Socrates counters Thrasymachus's belief that one should be unjust, with the conviction that justice is a trait which one should possess. This particular area of the discussion shows a contrast between the ideas of Socrates and Thrasymachus regarding the term. One of Thrasymachus's arguments that Socrates takes issue with is that in which he states that unjust rulers and cities are the strongest, making justice something that the less powerful and the unwise should aspire to obtain.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Locke Vs Glaucon Analysis

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    So, having presented how two similar starting points lead to very different paths, are there any similarities one can draw from both philosopher's accounts? In Book II of the Republic, Glaucon offers a “social contract” explanation for the nature of justice What men want most is to commit injustices without consequence What men want least is to be subject to injustices without the ability to fight back Justice, as such, is the result of the contracts between men to avoid these extremes (justice as the middle ground).…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In book one of Plato’s The Republic, the different accounts of justice have been brought up. The old man Cephalus has described two concepts of justice which is, justice is when you are telling the truth and practicing honestly and justice is also giving each other what he/she deserves. When old man Cephalus and Socrates had their discussion Socrates also had issues with his definition of justice as well. None of the definitions sit well with Socrates although he has not given his own definition. In the beginning of this book Socrates and Thrasymachus has debated about what is justice and it has appeared that Socrates has defeated the argument of justice being the interest of the stronger.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Definition Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    Justice can be described as “minding your own business.” The state and the ruler is just when its three classes or parts execute its own duties and do not interfere with each other. Therefore, injustice must be the opposite or as Socrates says, “…it must be a kind of civil war between the three parts, a meddling and doing of another ’s work, a rebellion by some part against the whole soul in order to rule it inappropriately (Plato…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    n Plato 's Republic, an analogy is struck between the state of the city and the state of the soul. While, in the latter case, a well balanced, or just, soul is one that is commanded by reason, and in which the spirited and appetitive parts of the soul play subordinate roles, a well balanced, or just, city is one in which the rulers are commanded by reason, the soldiers by spirit, and the laymen by appetites. The difficulty implicit in this state of affairs is that it does not appear, on reflection, that the so-called just city is truly just, since it would make better sense to say that a just city is one in which everyone has a just soul, rather than to anatomize the city in precisely the manner that the soul is, and on that basis call the…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon is unsatisfied with the argument between Thrasymachus and Socrates regarding Justice. Thrasymachus believes Justice is for the common good, it is not for the good for an individual, that any compromise is involved. Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ argument, he divides the good into three classes: things good in themselves, things good both in themselves and for their consequences, and things good only for their consequences. Socrates places justice in the class of things good in themselves and for their consequences without any hesitation. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove by exploring that Justice is best, not a compromise.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The main theme of Plato’s republic is to define justice and other virtues as an idea for a utopian city state based on Plato’s beliefs on justice and to show how these ideas could be implemented According to the definitions provided by Cephalus, Polemarchus and Thrasymachus, they’re intended to define justice as another’s injustice. The main focus throughout Plato’s Republic are the arguments Plato offers towards what is just and unjust. In the beginning of book 1 Cephalus states his argument about what he believes to be…

    • 88 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato, speaking through Socrates, views the perfect society as consisting of three classes that are not viewed more important than the other. However, he believes that philosopher-kings should rule the perfect city. Plato expresses that these rulers should have a passion and love for learning. In Book VII of the Republic, Plato introduces the most renowned metaphor in Western thought, the allegory of the cave. The allegory of the cave illustrates Plato’s views on the nature of knowledge, truth, and the effects of education on the human soul.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. In Book I of the Republic, Cephalus defines justice as the following: justice is telling truth and paying debts. However, Socrates refutes Cephalus’s definition by claiming that there are situations when it is not just to tell the truth and pay the debts. Sometimes, contracts are bad though it starts out good.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The opposing view of justice in the podcast and Plato’s Republic is given by Thrasymachus, who claimed justice belonged to those with power as they have the strength to break the rules, exploiting the weaker. Breaking the law is more just than…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following paper will be discussing Plato's perspective on the philosopher-kings and what makes them the best rulers. I will use examples from the text Plato, Republic to describe Plato's ideal city which will demonstrate Plato's true definition of justice and why no city can be just unless it is ruled by a philosopher-king. Through explaining Plato's ideal city this will aid in concluding why Plato believes philosopher-kings are the best fit to rule in order to truly have a just society. In the text Plato, Republic Plato is discussing human behaviour, most prominently the trait of justice.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Republic of Plato, Plato considers the nature and value of justice and the other virtues as they appear in both the structure of society as a whole and in the personality of an individual human being. This city-soul analogy supplies Plato with a metaphoric language that enables him to describe aspects of the structure and dynamics of the human soul. He began with a detailed analysis of the formation, structure, and organization of an ideal state before applying its results to a description of personal life. This paper will explore how the Republic uses the description of an ideal city-state as a vehicle for explaining the harmonious operation of the human psyche, which can be likened to a city. This “psychopolis” can be well or poorly…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    His main goal is to show the reader or his audience that it pays to be a just person even if the reward is not instant. In Socrates mind a just man is a philosopher king, who is essentially a smart thinker who does what is best for the community. When everyone follows this social order that Socrates proposes, it is possible for everyone to play their part and this gives way for the leaders to be philosopher kings who are the most intelligent thinkers. This ‘Kaliipolis’ is a city where the rulers crave knowledge, unlike a democracy where the ‘mob’ mentality rules causing the unfit to rule. He explains by stating, “Don’t understand that a little captain must pay attention to all seasons of the year, the sky, the star, to winds, and all that pertains to his craft, if he’s really to be the ruler of the ship” (Plato, 2004,448).…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, the images of justice are perceived differently between several characters in this novel. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, all present contrasting ideals of justice compared to the one envisioned by Socrates. Using the art of rhetoric, Socrates utilizes argumentation to identify the faults in each individual’s vision of justice, and how his unconventional perception of justices can change their entire society. The first vision of justice discussed in The Republic was Cephalus. Cephalus describes justice as honesty.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays