John Stuart Mills Difference Between High And Low Pleasures

Superior Essays
John Stuart Mill thought to help define utilitarianism by fixing some of the problems from earlier utilitarian theories that his father, James Mill, and friend, Jeremy Bentham, helped create. One of the ways to help utilitarianism Mill found is to distinguish the difference between high and low pleasures. This difference would be separated into intellectual pleasures, such as reading a good book, and sensory pleasures, like eating a savory piece of chocolate. While creating this divide between high and low pleasures, Mill explains that in an intellectual pleasure you would receive not a higher quantity but a higher quality of pleasure. Basically in layman 's terms Mill is saying that no matter how much chocolate you eat or how good it may …show more content…
If the end goal is to achieve the most amount of happiness we should be able to achieve that however we would like. I could make the statement that if I eat my favorite cookies and become happy then my happiness would spread through my nearby family members and friends. If my family goes to work happy they will then create a better work environment for everyone around them. My point is that one person can experience enough low pleasures to create a high pleasure and or do a whole lot of good for others. In the end, that is what utilitarianism is all about …show more content…
I probably do not do enough of them as I should. However, I would assume that attending college, writing essays, and completing research papers would also be a part of the higher pleasures. Therefore I could be doing a fair amount of higher pleasures for myself. That brings me to another point and question. At what point do we know when someone has experienced enough higher pleasures? It could be whenever a specific person has completed a fair amount of higher pleasures and if doing more of those pleasures were to make them unhappy, then that would be enough of them for the time being. Individually, I would not be able to sustain a lot of higher pleasures in a short period of time. This would cause me to get overwhelmed and I would not be able to focus on the greater task at hand. Human beings learn better in this situation. If you study a new subject for a short period of time while taking short breaks to keep your mental state up. You will allow yourself to retain more information about this new subject for a greater length of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This is a reasonable doubt, as pleasures that are good with virtue should reasonably be in a higher rank. However, as I have suggested, virtue lies in the process of each of the five ingredients’ harmonious co-existence with each other in the mixed life. In other words, pleasures are true and pure because of the virtuous process of harmonizing by the measure. And it is this process that makes true pleasures bound with virtue.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Consequently, the distinctly human pleasures are preferred by competent judges over the pleasures available to lower animals. 5. Therefore, the higher pleasures of aesthetic appreciation, moral reflection, and intellectual engagement are superior in quality to the purely sensuous pleasures. (Shipley) Following this further Mill believes that there are different types of pleasures and that each pleasure is inseparable from its cause.…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people do prefer these lower pleasures because it is easy. It is easy to accept the lower pleasures and be happy because they become unaware of what outside issues are occurring. Their mind is free of all problem, therefore they reach their…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case, something other than my happiness of book collecting and reading has managed to lessen my well-being, and that cannot be the case if Hedonism is true. Overall Hedonism has many attractive qualities. Most people want to be happy, and most people do not want to feel pain. Additionally, many people like the idea of choosing their own path to happiness, and being in charge of deciding what is best for their well-being.…

    • 2068 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today we routinely differentiate between hedonism as a theory of the good and utilitarianism as a consequentialist theory of the right. Mill, however, considered both doctrines to be so closely intertwined that he used the term ‘utilitarianism’ to signify both theories. On the one hand, he says that the “utilitarian doctrine is, that happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end.” (CW 10, 234) On the other hand, he defines utilitarianism as a moral theory according to which “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness…”…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, there are higher and lower pleasures, higher pleasures consisting of when one pleasure is desirable over another even if…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In efforts to find summum bonum or the ultimate good, philosophers during the 20th century began to investigate ethical issues, and tried to create their own versions of an ideal moral code. During this time, John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer base their ethical beliefs in the philosophy of utilitarianism. Both Mill’s essay Utilitarianism and Singer’s work Famine, Affluence and Morality explore the pursuit of happiness and its relation to moral philosophy. The doctrine of utilitarianism emphasizes the consequences of one’s actions as they add to the sum total of happiness.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill demonstrate two contrasting moral theories. The philosophers have very different ideas about ethics and happiness. Immanuel Kant, author of “Duty and Reason”, believed in the morality of the good will and duty. According to Kant, happiness is an emotion unable to be controlled while motive is controllable; therefore, duty is the most important aspect of leading a moral life.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are also many conflicting situations that people face since their judgments of pleasure are different. This disprove Mill’s argument that pleasure’s quality is one of the main part of moral actions. His logic of high quality pleasure is hard to prove since everyone’s happiness is different. A result might have different meanings to varied people, so it is hard to find the sum of happiness. Morality is balanced to people’s true happiness, but not based on the sum of…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He introduces the distinction between higher and lower quality pleasures. High quality pleasures are considered to be more intellectual such as reading a book or attending the opera. Low quality pleasures are simpler as they include vices such as chocolate, sex and, drugs. Mill assumes that since we are intelligent beings we will always choose high quality pleasures over lower ones. In order to determine what falls under higher or lower quality pleasures, he introduces the ‘competent judge’ test.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Through spring-boarding off opponent’s arguments, Mill defines the utilitarian vocabulary and fortifies his theory of morality. Mill begins by first defining “utility” in a way that holds the word neutral from belief that it is opposed to or based solely on pleasure. He defines utility as “not something to be contradistinguished from pleasure, but pleasure itself, together with…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Since a very young age we have been told by our parents to always tell the truth. But, do we always follow that order? No. Sometimes people lie. Lying can be defined as when a person knows the truth, but instead he says otherwise.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill bases his theory in human psychology, saying that desire is universal regardless of one’s religious convictions. He also recognizes that human pleasures differ in quality, not just quantity (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). Mill believed that human higher desires are those of reason and intellect while the lower desires are based on our immediate and biological needs and wants. Mill found that it is impossible to quantify lower desires because they are innate and natural. Some strengths of qualitative utilitarianism are that it does take into account natural human desires and gives them weight in order to help make an ethical decision (Wilkens, 2011).…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics