John Stuart Mill Individuality

Improved Essays
Our society faces a lot of challenges despite living in such a liberal world. We like to limit the activities we are not okay with or don’t understand, so in terms we label them as wrong or even outlaw them. We don’t like to experiment new ways of life, because we are often too comfortable living in our own shell of what is good and what is not. Anything outside of it is considered to be erroneous. John Stuart Mill stresses on the issue of conscience and individuality. Mill’s theory is that society should be free of any constraints; we should allow different opinions and experiments of living in order for man to be true to his nature. Society must facilitate and provide these alternatives of living in order for society to be vibrant and flourish. …show more content…
Mill would say he can be a drunk and he can be a gambler but he cannot be a father at least not all at once. If he is a father than he must perform his fatherly duties and nothing less than that. Experimenting in life should be the main concern in everyone’s mind, however, the majority of people are considered to be average and practice the norms. Mill writes, “But the evil is, that individual spontaneity is hardly recognized by the common modes of thinking, as having any intrinsic worth, or deserving any regard on his on account” (Mill, 65). In other words, people who are average cannot think outside the box and are headstrong that their way of life and thinking is the appropriate and ideal way, furthermore, they consider that to be good enough for everyone else. As a solution to that, Mill simply suggests that individuality should be the preeminent goal because it is fundamental to the development of the self. To illustrate this we can take the example of someone being gay and the considerable amount of people who still feel pretty uneasy with same sex marriage. Society makes laws to avoid the things they don’t understand, but what regrettably happens is those laws interfere in the wrong place.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The world is a vast place, filled with numerous individuals, all characterized by unique qualities. John Stuart Mill, a 19th century writer, philosopher, and businessman who placed great importance on those who find and offer new ideas, theorized that the two primary qualities in life were originality and genius. An original person is one who is independent of all others and is unique in all that they do, and someone who displays genius is unusually intelligent and creative. In “Genius and Originality”, Mill suggests that these qualities are indispensable in society since they prevent life and knowledge from becoming static, and without them, society cannot progress. He proposes that conformity is preventing genius and originality from flourishing, while freedom allows them to thrive.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He also argued that we should have more faith in the process of discussion, rather than the process of our own beliefs. When societies continue to conform to the authority (the government in this particular case) discussions cease to exist, and “dead dogma” occurs. Mill gave the example of religion, more specifically Christianity, to demonstrate how people follow tradition in a way that doesn’t challenge them to think for themselves. The Christians went about their lives following church rituals without asking any questions of why they followed them. This is a perfect example of why Mill would argue that this is why we need more people like the creators of the “Don’t Tread on me” website.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s philosophy contained a limited government or the notion of laissez-faire (hands off)! Concluding that men should be given civil rights as long as no harm was done to anyone. John Locke claimed all mankind was equal, believing that State of Nature has natural rights to freedom, liberty and justice. Meanwhile, Hobbes posed the notion that man was inherently evil and needed a monarchical government but both were against the Divine Right and developed the ‘Social Contract’(Carol 2017).…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many misconceptions that Mill believes to be either false or misleading in general. A common mistake is often made interpreting Utility or utilitarianism to be against the exact thing in which it stands for. Essentially, utilitarianism is the moral theory that one should seek pleasure, happiness, and the avoidance of pain. Mills statement expressing that the reality of what one should desire to reach in regards to moral standings is to seek pleasure and not to seek pain should hold constant throughout one’s life. Utilitarianism is all about promoting the "greatest amount of good,”.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He believes that tyranny of the majority may allow society to infringe on individual freedom will lead to conformity and oppresses and threatens an individual’s freedom, helping it to promote social censorship. For example, Mill stated that tyranny of the majority is more horrible than political oppression because it will affect and permeate people’s lives more, (Mill, Pg. 4) This shows that regular people such as family, friends, colleagues, and classmates will have more of a direct impact on an individual than people at the political or national level, showing that it is not the government or society that needs to be in check, but the other individuals or group of people that are harming the individual. Mill explains that people who wants freedom from social tyranny has to resist social conformity and moral behaviors that does not fit with their ideals, beliefs, or lifestyles, in which society at this point is a tyrant that enslaves the soul. Protection must be made on the basis of principle and can only stop if the individual do harm to society…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill, a philosopher during the mid-1800’s, is known as one of the most important western political philosophers in the past three hundred years. Many of his arguments on freedom can be seen intertwined with the current way we run societies around the world today. Being a self proclaimed Utilitarian, Mill focuses his arguments on making the collective reside with the most utility possible, with utility being defined by happiness. To achieve maximum utility, Mill presents three larger arguments,the harm principle, experiments of living, and freedom of speech. Before one can begin to agree or criticize Mill's arguments they must first delve into the core of Mill’s teachings, the harm principle.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this way, individual rights would be respected despite the majority, and many contemporary issues would be treated as basic rights such as access to women’s health facilities, recreational drug use, as well as other controversial issues which have attempted to be controlled by society. In such a society, Mill hypothesizes that citizens will benefit from further freedoms, while being actively discouraged to commit harmful acts. In modern civilization, there are certainly those who empathize with many of Mill’s perceptions of mass society, but only time will tell whether or not any of Mill’s prescribed treatments will be…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill believed the history of mankind is the struggle between liberty and authority. To Mill, there is continuous tension between two values in politics: liberty: individual freedom and Authority: the need for constraint. The struggle b/w the relations is carried on by the tyranny of Gov't. He breaks down authority into two parts: firstly, necessary rights belonging to citizens. Secondly, the "establishment of constitutional checks by which the consent of the society, or of a governing body, supposed to represent its interests, was made a necessary condition to some of the most important acts of the governing power.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A ruler or power is seen as a necessity to protect the weak from threats external and internal alike, but more often than not becomes a force against those that were meant to be protected. Still applying protection but also a sort of tyrannical pressure over the ruled. These tyrannies directly display themselves in separate yet simultaneous forms, forcing the masses at large to separate from the government and seek its own protections and/or liberties. The first tyranny discussed is that of expression, or lack thereof, in which a government silenced the expression of thoughts and opinions.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stuart Mill Conformity

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill disapproves of individuals who complacently allow external influences to mold their opinions, desires, and life goals. Mill emphasizes this disapproval by stating, "He who lets the world…choose his plan of life for him has no…other faculty than the ape-like one of imitation" (Mill 56). Imitation is the equivalent of conformity, a practice that detracts from a truly democratic society. The tone of disdain, with which Mill regards blind conformity, is apparent throughout the text. Mill praises the traits of firmness, self-control, and deliberation—traits that present themselves in individuals who recognize their sovereignty and take full advantage of their faculties.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill and Gerald Dworkin both have different perspectives of paternalism. As I have mentioned earlier, Mill is against paternalism and Dworkin claims that paternalism is justifiable. There are a few points in which both Dworkin and Mill make and I agree with some of those points, but I cannot agree with Dworkin on paternalism. Now to answer the question that was proposed earlier, is paternalism morally justified? And should it be implemented or not?…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s’ essay also argues that freedom of speech and diversifying opinions act as a fuel that drives social progress. Mill states, “... the only unfailing and permanent source of improvement is liberty, since by it there are as many possible independent centres of improvement as there are individuals” (Mill 65). One can gather that Mill believes that liberty is necessary for improvement and the more liberty present in individual members of society the more persons influencing change. This is an important message for our society to receive and is in accordance with our liberal democratic society. It demonstrates the importance of individuals and how their freedoms positively contribute to society because, as Mill bluntly states, without individuality…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one hundred people, were asked what does it mean to live the good life, no two responses would be exactly the same. Even though everyone’s response would be different, many of the responses would most likely include being happy. Similarly to how people’s responses would differ if asked the original question, everyone would have their own definition of what happiness means to them because certain words mean different things to different people. Many of the authors that were covered in class talked about happiness and its relation to the good life. The authors that gave the most insight into their view of happiness were Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays