Government Intervention In John Hayek

Decent Essays
Keynes together with Hayek were renowned economists who contributed positively on issues of economic importance. They howbeit, expressed different views over the same economic problems. John Maynard Keynes highly was of leaning toward government intervention. In his opinion, the entire economy should be subjected to unitary treatment with fiscal instruments being utilized to control the money supply. Hayek held an opposing view with emphasis on economic liberalism.
Keynes was in favor of government influence in determining monetary supply in the economy. The government must use tax, spending notwithstanding deficits as economic instruments for the economy. Keynes believed that when these tools are a proper use, the economy will realize full
…show more content…
According to Hayek, people should be allowed to choose freely without government interference. He argued that there is no need for central planning approach to the economy. He argued that central planning would only solve technical issues, but not economic problems. Hayek, who came up with the Chicago school of thought, believed that market forces should be left to control the money supply/ demand. In this instance, the market forces of demand/ supply should be left to determine the level of quantity along with price. Hayek advocated the free market within an economy (Fukuyama 2011).
Based on my arguments above, I would openly, as well as totally agree with Hayek. There is the need for less government intervention in solving economic issues. Less government intervention results in free markets together with perfect competition, allowing the forces of demand and supply to determine prices along with quantity within an economy. In some cases, government intervention can be promoted by political interferences. This intervention would worsen the scenario due to conflict of interest (Fukuyama
…show more content…
This tax reduction aims at improving economic growth by offering incentive for small-scale business by encouraging them to save. The individual taxes were reduced, hence promoting savings among the low-income individuals. President Reagan realized when low-income people are relieved from tax, they will highly be motivated to save. This motivation would improve economic growth of the country (Steuerle 2008).
In 1964, Kenedy-Johnson enacted the tax reduction act. It resulted in a reduction in individual tax of all citizens of the US by 20%. This time, all cadres of citizens benefited from the fee cut. This tax cut was seen to respond better to the economic situations as compared to a tax cut by President Reagan in 1981. By enacting a tax cut across the board, it is clear to note that the fee cut was void of discrimination by reason of it favoring everyone (Steuerle 2008).
The tax cut that was implemented by George Bush in 2001 lowered the rates of tax making retirement simpler. This tax also had an exclusion from gift taxes. This tax cut was to last for a period of 9 years.
In 2003, President George Bush also implemented tax cut. This tax cut, the jobs and growth relief reconciliation act (JGTRRA). It majorly targeted relief reconciliation, economic growth and employment (Krugman & Wells

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    “The classical view suggests that Real GDP is determined by supply side factors – the level of investment, the level of capital and the productivity of labor” (Pettinger, 2015). Therefore, the government should pursue competitive free market policies. The classical principle of a free market is that the government should give long-term solutions to the economy by letting individuals and businesses act freely based on their self-interest. If these principles were pursued, the classists believed, the unemployment could be easily mended. Moreover, they believed, in order to stop unemployment the companies could cut wages down, by doing so there would no unemployment.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, free market will promote the economic efficiency and develop the productivities, and ignore the homogeneous social distribution. For instance, America’s uneven education system, which quality is connected with income levels, is an obvious inequality. This reflects both a public investment deficiency and an asymmetric information. Improving heterogeneous distributional outcomes will inevitably involve either government intervention or certain incentives. For example, setting up minimum wage, unemployment insurance and tax system to eliminate the unequal distribution.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    By having that, there will be efficiency, equity, and economic growth. Governments would interfere in the market to enhance efficiency by encouraging competition, reducing externalities, and offering public goods (Samuelson & Nordhaus, 2010). Governments would encourage competition by reducing…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Milton demonstrated strong analytical skills, possibly because of the wide range of knowledge he had from being an economist. In evaluating Milton Friedman’s argument, it is possible to find some valid points about the monetary policy. One occurs when he stated that the monetary policy cannot peg interest rate and unemployment for long period of time. The monetary authorities can only fix the interest rate and unemployment for short period of time in order to influence the financial condition that will increase investmet and household spending in an economy. Mahadeva and Sterne (2000) said that the “central bank sets the interest rate for short term profit and establish a relationship between unemployment and interest rate to influence financial condition, in turn to affect the aggregate demand.” In addition, if the monetary policy is not regulated properly it will caused a volatile economy which will lead to loss in investments, high inflation rate, unemployment, collapsing of financial institution and escalated interest rate and price.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The monetary policy is the government manages the economy by controlling the money supply through regulation in interest rates. While both policies can help benefit the economy to either increase or decrease the consumer spending, the people are debating which policy is more effective. The most advocate speakers, John Keynes, has recommended…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The objective existence of economic power cause reality that income is determined by power rather than marginal productivity assumed by neoclassical theory. Thereby it is necessary to reconsider the minimum wage policy rejected by the two school. Some redistributive role for government is supposed to be warranted (Stilwell, 2011). There are clear evidences to support the claim that in the absence of state interference, the private sectors are unlikely to concern wage bargaining (Twomey, 2012). Surprisingly, according to Plowman and Perryer (2010), Adam Smith viewed as the champion of anti-government free markets, may have endorsed the implement of minimum wage policy.…

    • 1861 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The benefits of capitalism are that individuals choose what to consume leading to more competition and better products and services. Goods and services produced based on demand create incentives to cut cost and avoid waste. In addition, capitalism leads to economic growth and expansion. However, capitalism can also be non-beneficial because it offers a chance to a monopoly power, inequality leading to social division and recession and unemployment. The benefits of socialism would be the absence of monopolistic practices, greater economic efficiency, higher social welfare, and absence of business fluctuations.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He believed in more government spending. Hayek has a belief of self-corrections. He believes that the economy will fix itself. He also believes that the reason for various business cycles is driven by interest rates. Hayek is one who advocates for free market, but was opposed to government intervention.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It has become clear that by studying the interactions between the states and the market but the two have some hold on each other. While Smith argues that the role of economy is to self regulate and promote competition and the role of the state is to protect the public stay removed from the market system, Marx believes that the states should act as a mediator in the markets where the market is dependent on the aggregate household behavior. Keynes argues that a free market without any intervention by the state fails in several aspects such as employment and distribution of wealth. He believes that the state should have some influence on the market, though minimal. With all these competing ideas it is difficult to discertain which method is correct,…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Monetary Policy Analysis

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This targeting is a potential factor of why politicians try to influence monetary policy and the economy as a whole. They may have personal beliefs on whether the unemployment rate is too high, GDP gaps are too wide, or even that GDP growth is not high enough. This may be an attempt to push wages above market averages and to push for full employment in search of approval (Ehrmann & Fratzscher, 958-9). It is more effective for monetary policy to operate independently from the political spectrum in order to be as efficient as possible. Monetary policy can be described as the procedure of how a country specific monetary authority controls the money supply and in most cases focuses on interest rates used to boost economic stability and growth.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays