John Donogood Case Study

Improved Essays
Based on the facts and circumstances surrounding the case, John Donogood can not be charged with First Degree Burglary. A comparison of the statute and the situation presented illustrates that not all elements of the crime are satisfied. As stated, Mr. Donogood broke and entered into Mrs. Smith’s garage without her consent and, therefore, elements (1), (2), and (3) are satisfied. However, because the garage was not attached to the house and it was not used for sleeping, it does not constitute a dwelling as defined by the statute; therefore, element (4) of the law is not satisfied. Additionally, no person was present inside the structure when the breaking and entering occurred and thus the “actually occupied” requirement is not met; for this …show more content…
A comparison of the statute and the situation presented illustrates that all elements of the crime are satisfied. As stated, Mr. Donogood broke and entered into Mrs. Smith’s house without her consent and, therefore, elements (1), (2), and (3) are satisfied. Although the door was unlocked, this still constitutes a breaking and entering under the statute. Although Mrs. Smith spent time away from the residence, her house is considered a “dwelling” since it contained her personal belongings and was used for sleeping; therefore, element (4) is satisfied. The dwelling was not legally possessed by Mr. Donogood which means that it belonged to another and, therefore, element (5) is satisfied. Additionally, Mrs. Smith was upstairs sleeping during the incident, which means that the dwelling was “actually occupied” and, therefore, element (6) is satisfied. Furthermore, Mr. Donogood committed the offense at night and, therefore, element (7) is satisfied. Finally, Mr. Donogood intended to commit larceny upon breaking and entering into the dwelling and, therefore, element (8) is satisfied. Consequently, because all the elements of the crime are satisfied, Mr. Donogood can be charged with First Degree …show more content…
Based on the facts and circumstances surrounding the case, John Donogood can be charged with First Degree Burglary. A comparison of the statute and the situation presented illustrates that all elements of the crime are satisfied. As stated, Mr. Donogood broke and entered into Mrs. Smith’s house without her consent and, therefore, elements (1), (2), and (3) are satisfied. Though Mr. Donogood broke and entered into the storage room through an outside door, the storage room was attached to the bedroom. For this reason, the storage room is part of the dwelling and, therefore, element (4) is satisfied. The dwelling was not legally possessed by Mr. Donogood which means that it belonged to another and, therefore, element (5) is satisfied. Additionally, Mrs. Smith was present in her bedroom during the incident which means that the dwelling was “actually occupied” and, therefore, element (6) is satisfied. Furthermore, Mr. Donogood committed the offense at night and, therefore, element (7) is satisfied. Finally, Mr. Donogood intended to commit larceny upon breaking and entering into the dwelling and, therefore, element (8) is satisfied. Consequently, because all the elements of the crime are satisfied, Mr. Donogood can be charged with First Degree

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    I advised Garcia of the incident that occurred, which Garcia was aware of the incident. I asked Garcia if she heard or saw anyone. Garcia stated that she was in her room and did not see anyone, but Garcia stated that she did hear someone in the apartment (#2119). Garcia stated that it sounded like if someone was moving books and posters around. I asked Garcia about what time this was, which she stated approximately 1640.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Accordingly, after noticing the police car, the defendant abruptly halted and walked in the opposite direction. The action portrayed by the respondent aroused the suspicion of the police officers, who saw him enter into an alley on the near side of the apartment building. Due to the defendant’s temporary nature…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    B) The Nordstrom security guard did not have constructive possession of Marshall’s property because he did not have the special relationship required to establish constructive possession. One of the ways constructive possession is satisfied is if one has a special relationship with the employer. See, e.g., People v. Galoia, 31 Cal. App. 4th, 595 (1994) (finding no special relationship when a “Good Samaritan” lacked sufficient interest in the property being taken).…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The facts of Miller v. Alabama include a fourteen-year old named Evan Miller who beat and robbed his next-door neighbor, Cole Cannon. The date of the incident, Miller and his co-defendant, Colby Smith, went to Cannon’s home in search of drugs. When they found no drugs, they stole baseball cards and returned to Miller’s home. A few hours later, both Miller and Smith returned to Cannon’s home. Cannon was unconscious due to drinking and smoking, at which point Miller took $300.00 and Cannon’s driver’s license from Cannons wallet.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Name: Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991) Statement of Facts: The defendant Payne broke into his girlfriend’s neighbor’s house and tried to engage in sexual activity with her, she refused then Payne became violent. He killed Charisse, a mother of two and he killed her daughter. He also severely injured her son also by stabbing him numerous times.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crocker v. Pleasant Kalei Webb MTS 120 Mortuary Law Carl Sandburg College The case Crocker v. Pleasant is an example of the negligent to use reasonable means to contact the next of kin of Jay Crocker and therefore violating the Crocker’s right to due process. This paper of awesomeness will discuss the allegations of the Crocker family against a police officer named Pleasant for his failure to use reasonable efforts to notify the next of kin for the recently deceased Jay Crocker. As well as, a possible violation of the Crocker family’s right to due process and some possibility of dealing with mental anguish that they suffered because of the city’s lack of training, discipline, and watching over the conduct of the police officers…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Celia, A Slave By Melton A McLaurin Critiqued In the Introduction McLaurin uses court records, correspondences and newspaper accounts to share Celia’s story. His argument is “The lives of lesser historical figures better illustrate certain aspects of the major issue of a particular period” (such the morality of slavery) than to the lives of those who through significant achievements achieve national prominence.” Introduction xi In chapter one Beginning McLaurin uses the eighteenth federal census of Callaway County Missouri Notes page 144. Robert Newsom moved his wife and two young children from Virginia to Missouri between 1819 and 1822. He purchased land on the middle river minor tributaries of Missouri river.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Cannon Case Summary

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the evening of July 15, 2003, Cole Cannon went to the home of Evan Miller to make a drug deal with Millers mother (Miller v. Alabama, 2012). Evan Miller and his co-defendant Colby Smith followed Cannon back to his own trailer where all three of them smoked marijuana and played drinking games. After a while Cannon passed out and Miller stole Cannon’s wallet. Miller and Smith split $300.00 between them (Miller v. Alabama, 2012).…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On Wednesday, February 22, 2017, I spent my day observing juvenile detention hearings and a drug court trial in Mercer County, New Jersey. For my first observation, I went to Mercer Family Division in Mercer County, New Jersey. I observed several juvenile detention hearings. I asked one of my previous supervisors if I could sit in with her during her time in court. Overall the process for each child went relatively briefly.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The defendant, Mr. John Smith, is in no way guilty of the alleged assault charges brought to the court by his wife, Mrs. Jane Smith. This case, as so many in the United States court system are, ought to be viewed while keeping past rulings with coinciding facts in mind for the purpose of preserving precedent. Precedent is a core principle of the judicial decision making process that uses past relevant cases as the standard for ruling in future cases with similarities and should be implemented as it produces consistency among rulings. Furthermore, precedent can be appropriately applied in this instance since the men charged with assault in the cases Joyner v. Joyner, State v. Black, and State v. Rhodes all were proven innocent for reasons indistinguishable…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Dobinson Case Study

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The defendant himself is quoted as having said “I just left it”1 implying blatant carelessness in his conduct. This solidifies the fact that his direct actions were the cause of the fire, which would support the prosecutors approach to building the case based on this failure to act. However, the decision to apply case law and create a case on the basis of omission is questionable. Alternatively, the prosecutors could have opted for an alternative and less ambiguous route of recklessness and negligence. By doing so, they could argue based on a positive action, which was him recklessly lighting a cigarette indoors rather than his failure to act.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How can property kill someone? Judge Hall did not use the law as it was written. The laws did not say black or white, male or female, “Is Justice Blind?” Judge Hall saw what he wanted to see not what it said. (McLaurin 110).…

    • 1531 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    R V Mulvihill Case Study

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    LEGAL CITATION R v Mulvihill [2014] NSWSC 443, 16 April 2014, Fullerton J ELEMENTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CRIME ELEMENTS- Murder – Section 18 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) • Actus rea – An act or omission causing death. • Mens rea – Recklessly indifference to human life, or intention to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ryan Smith12/12/17Forensics Final Project Part 1 Task 1) What is the nature of the alleged crime, and how does the nature of the crime influence a prospective investigation? The Nature of the alleged crime is unauthorized access to 3 photos that belong to Brendan Oliver. The photos were stolen and are being sold without Mr. Oliver’s consent. The nature of the crime influences a prospective investigation because the photos contained some sensitive nature.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays