James Wetzler, Thomas Piketty's Wealth Taxe Proposal?

Improved Essays
I. Introduction
To counter the rising problem of economic equality, a global wealth tax is a proposal that has been widely received and considered a viable solution. This tax however, aimed at diminishing the high rate of accumulated wealth by top decile earners, may not be as effective as it purports in theory for a number of reasons: there is limited evidence proving the desired effects will be achieved, all countries must agree upon a uniform system and share information, studies have shown that top earners may not be inclined to reduce savings and increase investment, and regulation may be difficult to implement. In the alternative, a more pragmatic policy of redistribution could be implemented by taxing high earners at high marginal
…show more content…
James Wetzler, Thomas Piketty’s Wealth Tax Proposal Has Huge Problems, National Review, (March 27, 2014, 3:31 PM), http://www.nationalreview.com/agenda/374380/thomas-pikettys-wealth-tax-proposal-has-huge-problems-james-wetzler. Piketty’s approach runs counter to how income is taxed by most countries today, that is, going after the income produced by wealth such as dividends, rents, and capital gains, instead of the wealth itself. If the United States, for example, were to impose a national wealth tax, the IRS might have difficulty collecting from the wealthy because those who own a large quantity of assets would be incentivized to move or transfer title to their assets abroad. Piketty recognized this possible effect and therefore proposed the tax to be global, making assets taxable regardless of location. The effectiveness of this system depends on the assumption that all countries and tax havens in the world agree to tax equally and share information, an event that seems highly …show more content…
There is however, limited evidence from a few countries that have used such a system. Between 2002 and 2007, French Economist Eric Pichet examined the effects of France’s “solidarity” wealth tax and made a number of key observations. Eric Pichet, The Economic Consequences of the French Wealth Tax, 14 La Revue de Droit Fiscal 5 (2007), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1268381. France’s solidarity tax on wealth, created in 1981 and later reestablished in 1989, was intended to prompt redistribution, narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor. Id. at 3. Some of the conclusions made by Pichet in his study included: tax collection remaining at a low level (around 1.6% of proceeds); capital flight amounting to approximately €200 billion since the introduction of the wealth tax; the wealth tax likely being responsible for reducing GDP growth by 0.2% per annum, or around 3.5 billion (roughly the same as it yields); and the wealth tax causing France to become impoverished, shifting the tax burden from wealthy taxpayers leaving the country to the rest of the people. Id. at 2. Pichet’s analysis of the French wealth tax system supports the notion that the wealthy will be compelled to take their money out of the country and evade taxes, a conclusion drawn from statistics of rising property values and the distribution

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The long-standing economic inequality, which results from many factors such as the gender, the ethnicity, the age, the level of education and so on, has been growing for decades. Nowadays, much of the wealth is controlled by a tiny handful of the elites rather than the working poor. How would people split up income between the top ten percent and the rest if it were up to them? The answer depends on which group they belong to, but one thing is for sure, that most of them would strive for more benefit for themselves. The gap between the upper class and the lower class has been expanding, and many people are concerned about this phenomenon.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The extra wealth surplus potentially could be dispersed through leaving the wealth to an individual’s family, spending the wealth on public projects, or administering the wealth during the completion of the individual’s life. Out of all three options, the third option, in Andrew’s opinion, provides…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In the past decade the wealthiest percentile has seen its income grow by 17 percent.” (Myers) So let’s do the math. The 1 percent of the population that already controls 40 percent of the wealth continues to get richer but the poor is still being asked to pay more in taxes. While this is happening the mighty 1 percent continues to receive tax breaks to protect their fortunes.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man contains an interesting passage that pertains to Paine’s thought of America in 1791. He claims that America is very just and credits that to the government. Looking at America today, one may wonder if Paine’s characterization of America still holds true. One statement of his says: “the poor are not oppressed, the rich are not privileged.” That is something that relates to a multitude of recent instances in America that clearly show that Paine’s perception of America in 1791 does not hold up today.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Speculative Essay The overall share of wealth is controlled by the top 1% in the United States. The total income of the United States is increasing every day however, the income gap between the top 1% and the middle is growing more every day. All the writers believe that the distribution of income among all residents in the United States is at its worst. The writers in this unit are aware of the unfair income distribution in United States therefore, these writers would support the raise of taxes on the wealthy.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to John Miller’s “Tax Wealth,” “Taxing wealth and large estates is essential. To fair taxation we will need to a spate of grassroots organizing from workers’ organizations to organizations, that of those who have benefited most from our collective efforts give back the most” (Parenti,141). In other words in order to make taxation suitable for everyone it only seems essential to tax the rich since they acculumalate the majority of the money. Even though this breaks social democracy principles, not everyone can be equal but the main goal…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the advancement of the Gilded Age, the United States saw an increasing disparity between the poor and the rich. Only a small amount of people had wages that allowed them to enjoy the life that they desire. The majority of American workers earned very little to fully enjoy life. In “Progress and Poverty”, Henry George criticized the current economic climate during the late 1800s and how we should solve it. George stated that as time progresses, poverty would expand and lead to even more problems.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, an exclusion limit exists, so only estates with combined assets of over $5.45 million are subject to an estate tax. Thus, only the nation’s most wealthy citizens ever need to plan for these sorts of taxes. Yet Carnegie still believes the estate tax to…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He published the following chart that showed the few rich owned 75% of the countries’ wealth but paid less in taxes than the middle or working…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The majority of American citizens are seeing their share of the pie shrink more and more, while a tiny portion of the populace is gaining funds and influence in leaps and bounds. Is it fair that less than 1% of the total population controls so much of the wealth and are given special considerations when it comes to tax laws? This can be debated back and forth until our faces turn blue. The real question is why are they given these favorable circumstances? Why should they be seen as better than the rest of us?…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although taxes have been in existence for around 5,000 years, many educated people are still left wondering who should have to pay what. (“Taxes”) The main idea that leaves large quantities of people divided is progressive taxation. Progressive taxation is the concept that the wealthy people of a nation should be responsible for paying their taxes at higher rates. While George F. Will expresses his negative thoughts about progressive taxation, George Lakoff and Bruce Budner are strong advocates behind this philosophy of progressive taxation.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wealth Inequality Essay

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although each person has the right to make as much money as possible, in the United States the government should however keep the income rise proportioned by taxing the wealthy more and the poor less. In recent years the opposite happened where the taxes on the wealthy were cut from a top rate of 68% in 1980s to 28.5% by 1988. The share of federal tax revenue paid by corporations has dropped from 33 cents of every dollar collected in 1953 to less than 10 cents today. (Donald Barlett and James Steele: America: Who Really Pays the Taxes? Andrews and McMeel:…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most of the rich people believe the strategy of trickle down economic. When their corporations earn money, and they can create more job opportunities for the lower class people. However, the goal of trickle down has never existed. The wine stayed on the top cup. As Nicholas Fitz expressed in the article “Economic Inequality: It’s Far Worse Than You Think” People have no idea how worse is the gap between the rich people and the poor people.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The issue of inequality exists on a global platform and touches on all facets our lives. The power to accumulate and redistribute wealth is with the wealthy elite that can manipulate markets at will, however, Stiglitz clearly defines the dangers of such to society, “…there are two ways to become wealthy: to create wealth or to take wealth away from others. The former adds to society. The latter typically subtracts from it…” (Stiglitz 396).…

    • 1859 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For decades one question has continuously came up― should the rich pay a higher tax rate because of their wealth? There are two separate types of rich. There are those who inherit the money, and those who have worked hard and strived to be a successful person. Therefore, to answer the question previously stated, higher tax rates should not pertain to the ones who made sacrifices to become wealthy.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics