Informatio Are Priceless Artifacts

Artifacts are a significant part of the world. They help us learn more about the past, give new ideas for the future, and have a strong influence on the ways we do things. However there has been some controversy about where these artifacts should be held. Should archaeologists leave the items in their original location or place them in museums? Looking at both options, it is clear we should preserve the artifacts and keep them in museums. Therefore, it allows scientific research for these artifacts and saves the memories from them. Additionally they will be protected from organizations such as ISIS and from decaying. For many years, scientists have relied on artifacts to provide information about the past. Some say that it is a way to bring these people back to life. Nonetheless, people argue that instead of researching these items for valuable …show more content…
Undoubtedly, no. To begin, the extremist group ISIS has demolished numerous historic sites full of significant artifacts. Including Nimrad, a city in the ancient Assyrian Kingdom. This city celebrated literature and contained sacred texts. Another place tragically destroyed by ISIS was Khorsabad. Which the Oriental Institution said in Article 4, “Khorsabad is unusual among the Assyrian palaces because of its stylistic innovations, the preservation of paint on its reliefs, and the extensive ancient written documentation concerning the organization of the building project.” Instead of having these artifacts get destroyed by ISIS, they should be relocated into a safe, protective, different place. Besides ISIS, these historic items can become ruined by the weather and climate of the place they are in. Even though it can be risky to transport artifacts, with proper care they will be fine. The Titanic wreckage is thought to explode or implode in the future years. However if it is brought to a museum, then the artifacts will not be