Kant's Morality Of Lying

Improved Essays
For Kant, lying is always wrong. It does not matter the situation someone is, as long as someone does the right thing for the sake of duty. However, there are paternalistic lies, which are lies that human being uses for protecting other people’s lives. Kant thinks if we do so, we are taking away their human rights. He says that lying affects our “intrinsic worth”, would threat people as a mean and not as an end, and would hurt people’s feeling. First, each person is born with “intrinsic worth”. A person is capable to make his or her own choices. In any case, if someone pretends to save one’s life, he or she says a paternalistic lie because they are protecting him or her. However, if we do the right things for the sake of duty, we are going …show more content…
So, in order to be moral, we have to respect the other person’ life. Our actions and decisions can be considered whether they are moral or not. By reasoning, we can identity the limits of understanding any particular situation and respect opinions or decisions. Utilitarian says that lying is right as long as it benefits the most number of people; Kantians, lying is always wrong. For example: a very young girl gets pregnant, and she is deciding either abort or not. She thinks that she has to take care of the baby, stop studying for a while, moved out to another house because of her parents would kick her out. She finally decides that she is going to abort no matter what. She did it and tells her mom that she will be on vacation for a week. She never told her boyfriend that she was pregnant. For Kant, she is not being moral because she is not protecting the baby’s feeling and her parents’ feelings. The baby is not born yet, and has the right because the baby is a life. Even if her parents get mad, she could have handled that for herself along with her boyfriend. Furthermore, she is not counting her boyfriend’s feelings as well. She is choosing for herself. Yet, she is not thinking rationally and lies to everyone just to “protect the baby, parents, and boyfriend’s feeling” and they do not get worried, but she is not doing

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In relation to lying, Kant is concerned that the action cannot be universalized. Kant believes actions should be universal because those actions are assisting in the function of society. An immoral action does not help the action function well. In the case of lying, the trust necessary to form a society is eroded and the society cannot function. Thus, lying is an action that cannot be morally permissible.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his second argument, Kant is tempted to create exceptions to the rule against lying because in some instances, the consequences of not lying will be bad and the…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I argue that lying is permissible in situations where lying is used for the greater good of others, which is supported by John Stewart Mill’s conception of Utilitarianism. According to Kant in the “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals” it is not permissible to lie because he defines morality as not harming others, which lying does according to his “Metaphysics of Ethics.” Conversely, Utilitarianism is the theory that right actions maximize happiness, which could mean this happiness is acquired at another’s expense. At the core of this theory is the Greatest Happiness Principle. This principle states that one should act such that one’s actions produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical dilemma here is autonomy and non-maleficence. The principle of autonomy recognizes the rights of individuals to self-determine and is based on the human capacity to direct one's life according to rational principles. Autonomy in this case recognizes that this family had the ability to determine what to do with this pregnancy either, to carry it to term or not. Another ethical principle is non maleficence which means not harming or inflicting the least harm possible to reach a beneficial outcome.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Duty

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    136). This general rule of no duty should not apply to a woman and her fetus. When a mother brings a child in the world, for those first nine months she is the only one who can care for the child and provide direct nourishment to the child. In the cases where the mother purposely got pregnant, she chose to conceive a child and therefore formed a duty and responsibility to take care of the baby. That is just like buying a dog and not feeding, training, or walking it.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In “Rejecting All Lies: Immanuel Kant”, an article by Sissela Bok, Bok states that the truth can not be avoided, no circumstance can cause you to withhold the truth. Bok supports her claim by writing about Immanuel Kant who believes that you should not avoid the truth at any time, and having the benefit of being clear and not needing to track the lies you have told. Bok want to show all lies are not okay in any circumstance, whether it’s to save a person’s life, or to spare someone’s feeling.…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Take the axe murderer situation for an example. An axe murderer comes to your door and asks where your friend is, and you know your friend is hiding in your house. According to Kantian Ethics, you should never lie, so you should tell the murderer where your friend is hiding. This conflicts with our moral intuitions. It makes much more sense to lie that your friend is not there than to tell the murderer where they are, so they can get killed.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moreover, Kant would place no blame on the man for telling the truth. It is not his fault that the other man is a murder, and he is acting from duty, the most morally correct course of action. Utilitarians would have some substantial critiques for Kantians, calling their morality too ridged. The categorical imperative is too unforgiven to the subtleties of circumstance, which could result in dire, avoidable consequences, such as in the previous example. Contrastingly, a Kantian might say that Utilitarianism is also too ridged, but in a different way.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory is widely studied in philosophy and the field of ethics. In his theory, Kant expresses the ways to determine the morality of an action: examining the intentions behind the action in question is most important instead of merely considering the consequences. Moral actions, he explains, must have the intention of being consistent with duty for the sake of duty and doing the right thing; they cannot be motivated by any inclinations. Actions inconsistent with duty would be, for example, lying, cheating, stealing, or breaking a promise. These actions could never be moral in any case since they defy the honesty of duty.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believes that moral rules are not analytic but synthetic. They are not true just by the meaning of the words. We need to put something together (mental operation) just an operating of reason. For instance, for Kant killing people is wrong just by the definitions of the word but by reasoning. For example, if my car is red, I need to see it to know it.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Kant

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill and Kant Kant and Mill are two philosophers with differing ethical theories. The crux of the disagreement between these two philosophers is that they both disagree on the methods by which we should derive moral rules and guidelines. Specifically, which guidelines we should use in deciding what is ethical, and which justifications we should use for the evaluating moral value of actions? Kant’s deontological theory attempts to answer these questions through a sound reason based approach. The strength in Kant’s theory is that it rests on a foundation of consistent obligatory universal rules, with an emphasis on the intentions of the agent.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    never lie) in certain circumstances may not be seen as ‘morally wrong’ for example if we take the case scenario of lying to a kidnapper, is this seen as morally wrong? Thus are our actions justified as right or wrong based on the condition and the person we are lying to? This contradicts Kant’s principle as one is not being treated an end within themselves but rather as a mean. As lying to a kidnapper is not wrong since the kidnapper is portrayed as the ‘negative’ character, thus they do not have dignity, kidnappers are not rational beings so they don’t deserve to be treated as an end in the kingdom of ends. Kant would argue that we are ‘morally responsible for the consequences of lying but we are not responsible for telling the truth’, thus lying on the basis of consequences is irrational as consequences are out of our control, when one choses to lie we are responsible for lying no matter the circumstances or the character of the person we are lying to.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lying… Is it okay to lie and if so, when should I lie? Many people think that it is sometimes okay to lie in certain situations such as protecting someone's feeling or possibly, savings someone's endangered life. Although others may argue that lying is never okay because you may lose your trust with someone close to you, which is completely possible and even though we all may be conflicted on the topic of lying there are positives and negatives to both sides of the spectrum. Most of us can agree that lying to protect someone's feelings is one of the most common reasons to lie to another.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Bok, para. 2). One can see by this that Kant believed that having the title of a liar is an extreme insult. In addition, this proves why lying should be prohibited, because being called a liar can bring shame for not speaking the truth. In conclusion, one reason why lying should be stopped is that it harms people's lives, shown by Immanuel Kant, an 18th century German…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Philosophy and Abortion Argument Abortion has been a highly debated topic in today 's society. It is something that happens everyday. It is wrong to terminate a pregnancy before childbirth. Abortion causes unfair death. Abortion in general is wrong.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays