When most people think of criminal law, they inherently think of crimes such as murder or rape which usually require the culprit to have some sort of idea of the consequences their act will bring. This awareness is called mens rea and it refers to the knowledge of wrongdoing as a part of a crime. Mens rea and actus reus, the actual criminal act, must both be usually shown in order to prove a crime, however there are some exceptions which do not require mens rea to be shown. This affects crimes of omission as mens rea is not always a requirement while actus reus is.
To determine a crime of omission has occurred there must be certain criteria met, such as establishing a duty of care, whether that duty of care was breached and also if there was a connection between the breach in duty and the harm that occurred to the victim. Duty of care can be established under several titles which cover certain situations.
Special relationships
This classifies as close family relationships but is not defined solely by that as the courts have not identified the exact relationships that fall under this heading. An important case in …show more content…
Assumption of care can be applied to any individual who takes on the care of another person. Decisions on assumption of care will rely on the circumstances of the case to decide if the defendant voluntarily assumed the care of the victim. A case of this type can be seen in R v Stone and Dobinson . The case revolved around the defendants who took in Stones sister with the assumption of taking care of her. The two defendants both had low IQ’s, this led to the worsening of the victims health due to the defendants lack of care which inevitably led to her