Lamont V Strathern Analysis

Great Essays
When discussing criminal responsibility, moral responsibility will always play a part within the analysis. One of the main theories in regard to moral responsibility which relates directly with criminal responsibility, is the concept of moral luck. This theory will be assessed further within this paper, with reference to relevant case law.
Typically, we associate responsibility with a voluntary actions. Therefore, blame tends to be assigned to the individual when they voluntarily carry out an act and have awareness of the possible consequences which are associated with the action they are carrying out. In some scenarios, individuals may not have full control over their actions. For example, in regards to the legal system, a plea of provocation
…show more content…
One of which being the case Lamont v Strathern . Here, it was proven that the accused put his hand towards an individual’s pocket with the intention of stealing money. However, it was not proven whether there was in fact anything within the pocket which the accused could have taken possession of.
It was argued that the accused could not be charged with theft due to a lack of proof that he had physically stolen from the pursuer. This argument mirrors the objective approach as it looks directly to the reality of the situation. If the pockets of the man were empty, it is impossible for any theft to have taken place and therefore it is argued that the accused cannot and should not be found guilty.
However, the court opted for the subjective approach. The court looked through the perspective of the accused at that moment of time. The fact that there was nothing within the pocket for the accused to steal was something which was out of the accused control, which may be described as moral luck. If there were something within the pocket, the accused would have completed the crime and therefore was willing to cause criminal harm. It was held sufficient to justify a conviction of attempted theft as the accused had reason to believe that there may have been something to take possession of within the pocket and therefore had sufficient mens
…show more content…
It was held that an allegation of pregnancy was an essential part of a charge of attempting to procure abortion. It was held that to attempt something which is physically impossible cannot be a crime. Through the objective stance, the court ignored the fact that the accused was willing to carry out criminal harm. The fact that the individual was not pregnant was something which the accused was not aware of and was something which was out with her control and through the use of the objective approach, the accused was found not to be criminally

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Alvan Ng First Tetralogy by Antiphon “Eikos” How do you prove that something is not your doing? How do you show that you were never there? Often we can only prove the concrete; we present evidence to prove a point or to prove otherwise, and we base our stand on evidence. Take for example the civil war in Israel between the Israel Defense Forces and the Hamas.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mrs. Van Bliven claims that her $25,000 necklace was taken, but image and text evidence suggest otherwise. For this reason, Mrs. Van Bliven should be arrested and the necklace is in her room. Mrs. Van Bliven had a motive to stage the heist in pursuance to gain insurance money from the “crime”. First, if someone were to break glass to get into a room, the fragments would normally end up inside the room, as the person is impacting the windowpane from the outside to gain access. In this case, the image shows that the remainder of the window had ended up on the balcony, outside the room and the text attached to the scene states that “[Mrs. Van Bliven] locked her door...”…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Cannon Case Summary

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the evening of July 15, 2003, Cole Cannon went to the home of Evan Miller to make a drug deal with Millers mother (Miller v. Alabama, 2012). Evan Miller and his co-defendant Colby Smith followed Cannon back to his own trailer where all three of them smoked marijuana and played drinking games. After a while Cannon passed out and Miller stole Cannon’s wallet. Miller and Smith split $300.00 between them (Miller v. Alabama, 2012).…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Juvenile Court System

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When Winship went to court, the court ruled that Winship was guilty based on preponderance of evidence. This evidence was based on an employee’s testimony that he saw Winship running from the store shortly before the woman discovered her money was missing from her purse. Contrary to other employee’s testimonies that said the witness’s testimony couldn’t have been factual based on his location, this is the preponderance of evidence that the court accepted as plausible. Preponderance of evidence is different from beyond a reasonable doubt because with preponderance, the evidence does not directly point to one person or another based on the amount of incriminating evidence against said person; the preponderance of evidence points to the more probable truth based on the evidence, but not beyond a reasonable doubt. The court also based their ruling on the fact that had this crime been committed by an adult, the punishment would be much more severe.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Facts and holding Warren McCleskey and three other furnished men ransacked the Dixie Furniture Store in Atlanta, Georgia, on May 13, 1978. Amid the burglary, Officer Frank Schlatt entered the front of the store and was lethally shot in the face. Nobody really saw the slaughtering. After McCleskey's capture regarding another outfitted theft, he admitted to the Atlanta hold-up, yet denied shooting Officer Schlatt. In any case, immediate and incidental confirmation indicated McCleskey as the triggerman.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Straw Purchaser Analysis

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brecht, 113 S.Ct. at 1722. The evidence presented to the jury was enough to convict Mr. Brown of both actual and constructive possession. The jury, through circumstantial and direct evidence, and without the use of the stipulation, found that Petitioner had possession over the firearm when he hastily placed it underneath the seat upon noticing the approaching…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marley Lyster PHIL 1000 Assignment 2 Prompt 2 Susan Wolf’s compatibilist predisposition evaluates moral responsibility with her “Deep Self View.” Not only does she argue that events can be fully fixed and determined and one can have some freedom in action, but also that the agent only has moral responsibility in these actions if they are in control of their deepest desires (Wolf, 460). After presenting this view, Wolf uses her example of JoJo to demonstrate a hole in her own Deep Self View that can be patched by the addition of a sanity clause (Wolf, 462). Should her compatibilist view be accepted, the sanity clause does justly remedy the blatant weakness JoJo reveals in her Deep Self View to resolve her argument’s inadequacy.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alex Davis Case Study

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the given scenario the burden of proof and its parts were are all addressed in some way or another. The levels include a hunch, reasonable suspicion, probable cause, prima facie evidence, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt. For instance, the police had a hunch when they heard the description of the suspect. They were told that the robber was a white male, in his 20s and of the average body type. This could describe almost half of the male population, but somehow this gave the police the impression that the robber must have been Alex Davis due to his previous record of robbery and theft.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shoe Box Case

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The appellant will argue that the words written on the container, the location of the container, and that Ms. Poe placed the shoebox in its current location “a while back” would preclude a reasonable officer from relying on her apparent authority. The words written on the container show no more than that Mr. Poe was in some fashion making use of the container. The word “KEEP” on top of the shoebox does not manifest his expectation of…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The tone that has been used in this article is defensive tone. The conclusion paragraph clearly demonstrated the author’s belief that stealing is always wrong. The author also hopes to set a mood of influencing the readers to agrees with his point of view when he cited couples of arguments that proves stealing is wrong regardless of the people’s morality…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary of the Lindbergh Baby Case In this case, the police responded to a call at 11:30 pm on March 1, 1932, of a possible kidnapping. They arrived on a rainy night, to the residence of Charles and Anne Lindbergh. Their twenty-month-old son had gone missing from his crib. The police started looking for signs of who may have kidnapped the child.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The perception of criminal intent in Criminal Liability is known as ‘mens rea’, which means to be wrongful or illegitimate desire. If a human being without having harmful intention causes harm, then that person lacks mens rea and, by this logic, should not be criminally sued. Despite the fact that the approach of mens rea is mostly accepted, complication takes place in implementing it to appropriate cases. Several crimes need a very huge degree for intention, while others need considerably less. Criminal law has tried to clear the intention necessity by making the perception of "specific intent" and "general intent."…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Torrt And Wrongful Omission

    • 2596 Words
    • 11 Pages

    INTRODUCTION • Origin of the word Tort and its meaning: The word tort is derived from Latin word ‘tortum’, which means ‘to twist’. It basically refers to a conduct which is not upright or lawful. In English, the term tort is refers to a ‘wrong’.…

    • 2596 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Scampie And Magneto

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Issue one: Whether the court has jurisdiction to try Scampie for the offences involving Magneto? The general principle is that a State only has jurisdiction to try offences that are committed within its borders. However, legislation has acted to artificially extend a country’s physical boundaries for the purpose of jurisdiction. In Cox v. Army Council [1963] AC 48, HL, the words “or which, if committed in England, would be punishable by that law” found in section 70 of the Army Act, 1955 was given effect to convict a British Soldier for driving without due care and attention contrary to the English Road Traffic Act.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mazhabhanbali Analysis

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages

    MazhabHanbali differentiates between the two conditions of unlawful sexual intercourse, whether it was being committed with the consent of the women or without her consent. If it was a non-consensual act and she was killed, the defender shall be liable for qisas. But if she was a consenting party to the unlawful sexual intercourse the defender shall not be liable for any punishment. Whereas, consent of the parties for unlawful sexual intercourse is of no importance in Shari'ah and in such cases if the defender causes death of both the parties he will not be liable.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays