Social Rewards

Improved Essays
“Rewards and status in society keep one motivated to excel in life.”
By considering a few local issues that you come across, discuss objectively how the above statement is able to reflect the construction and maintenance of the structure of your society. From the above statement we can see that the statement is made up with three major component which is “Rewards”, “Status” and “Motivated”. To fully justify the meaning of the statement “Rewards and status in society keep one motivated to excel in life.” , we need to find out the meaning of the three major components first. The first major component is the word “Rewards”. Rewards can be define as a thing given in recognition of one’s service, effort or achievement. Generally, rewards can
…show more content…
These three bases are the respectively, economic, political and social rewards. The first bases of the stratification is wealth. According to Karl Marx, the industrial society can be divided into two major classes and one minor class in the nineteenth century. The two major classes are known as the bourgeoise (capitalists), the petite bourgeoise (small capitalists) and the proletariat (workers). By the Marxists theory, these 3 classes is differentiated on the basis of two criteria, the people who own the means of the production – tools, factories, offices and stores – and with the ability to hire others to work for them. The bourgeoise (capitalists) is knowns as the people who own the means of production and hire others to work for them for the production. For the proletariat (workers), they do not own the means of productions and can’t afford to hire others to work for them. Hence in this case, they are forced to work for the capitalists in order to survive in the society. Then, the petite bourgeoise (small capitalists) are the one who own the means of production but lack in the ability to hire others which means that they need to do most of the work themselves. Examples of small capitalists are shopkeepers, doctors, lawyers, and others self-employed persons. The small capitalists had been considered as a minor transitional class by Marx as he believed that these people eventually forced downed into the working class as their means of production can be taken by the giant corporations, the capitalists. Therefore wealth become a form of reward which most people long for and work for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some children, especially those who are less confident, need more encouragement than others. Rewards A reward is a result of good behaviour. It’s a way of saying ‘well done’ after the child has behaved well or done something good.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Engels and Marx believed that the fight between the classes is the base for all history and social conflicts. The wealthy class, known as the bourgeoisie, were those who owned the factories and the means of production. Marx and Engels believed that the bourgeoisie made their money off of their employees, the working class, what they termed as the proletariat. The rich got richer while the poor got poorer. The Communist Manifesto also stated that the working class will rebel against the rich to take the wealth the they deserve.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Like the classical economists, he focused on the dynamic evolution of capitalism as a system, and the turbulent relationships between different classes. ”(Stanford p.54) During the Mid-nineteenth century, Marx opposed capitalism, believing “payment of profit on private investments did not reflect any particular economic function” (Stanford p.54). Marx is saying that the workers aren’t getting paid for the amount of work they put in. Capitalists were exploiting these workers and rather than sharing the wealth/profits, they were paying the workers a diminished amount (Labor Theory of Value).…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The goal of the capitalist is to achieve the largest profit margin as possible. The workers can usually never own anything except their labor, which is their means of making money. Marx lived during the industrial revolution, which saw the advent of tremendous wealth due to the large number of factories being built during this time. Living and working conditions were sub par for the working class during these times. People worked really long and laborious hours for generally a small amount of money, which in turn made the factory owners abundantly wealthy.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One sociologists who has discussed the topic is Karl Marx. He claimed that there were only two classes, the owners and the workers. Workers merely possessed their capability to work- Marx referred to them as “labor power”-and since owners determined wages and paid workers, owners had clout over the labor power. Marx talked mostly about the two classes of owners and workers, but he was aware of a third class which he named “petite bourgeoisie” which directly translates from French to little middle class. Owners of small businesses were considered to be occupants of this class.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Porter Income Inequality

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He also shows that the portion of national income owned by the bottom fifth of the population changes in both directions (although more heavily downward) over time. This reflects processes of ebbs and flows, which once again contrast Marx’s vision of a one-way street toward equality through the breakdown of class. Finally, Marx argued that the proletariat would gain a sense of “class consciousness” and rebel against the bourgeoisie, giving way to a more equal society. In this article, though, there is no mention of any revolutionary sentiments among the working class against the capitalists. This may add a level of complexity to Marx’s theory where there may be other factors that promote solidarity other than class.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Define Meritocracy

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In lecture, Dr. Schweingruber defined meritocracy as a social system where success is earned. The more effort you exert, the more you are rewarded from your actions. While this is a factor that could influence one to reach their goals, it is not the only path to success. Dr. Shweingruber identified a few traditional ways that one may reach success which included having good moral, a can-do attitude, and determination. The combination of these enabled me to reward myself just recently.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    England in the eighteenth century, went through a period of time, where people who were once self-sufficient migrated toward cities, where they began manufacturing machine made goods. This was known as the Industrial Revolution. England had been building up its empire since 1607. When the Industrial Revolution began in 1760, England had the cash, and therefore the means to production. That was a good amount of time to gather wealth and resources in order to, spur such an industrial boom in England.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Reay, Diana et al. 2001.Choices of Degree or Degrees of Choice? Class, ‘Race’ and the Higher Education Process. Sociology.35 (4) (855-874) Diana Reay in her article “Choices of Degree or Degrees of choice” points out the class inequalities within educational institutes, and how this effects the decision making process for working class, and ethnic minority families who go on to study in higher education.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Karl Marx explains social inequalities through a society being stratified along economic lines and social class being defined solely on economic position. According to Marx, a person’s economic position is their relationship to means of production, which defines social class. Based on an industrial society, he defined social class by two classes; the capitalist class (Bourgeoisie) and the working class (Proletariat). Marx felt strongly against capitalism and believed that everyone should have a communistic society, which would have no surpluses so only what is needed by the people would be produced.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During feudalism there was multiple levels of social stratification. However, under the burgeoning new system, capitalism, there was only two social, and economic groups – the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx summed…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They describe in an economy under capital rule there will be the producers of more capital (bourgeoisie) and, “a class of labourers, who live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labour increases capital” (Protelerriat) (Marx and Eagales,18). Yet, the motivation to participate in the United States capitalistic class society is social stratification. Marx Weber theorized that there is probability of a few factors such as: style of life, education, and intergenerational prestige as determinants of status (Weber 179,180). This evolves to the idea of social mobility; that acquiring more wealth, marrying into a higher class, and education will allow people to receive positive privileges and a better quality of…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays