How Did Temujin And Jamuqa Commit The Last Ceremony?

Improved Essays
When Temujin was eleven he became the sworn friend of a boy named Jamuqa when they exchanged gifts and played together. Much later, they again declared themselves sworn friends when they exchanged gifts, renewing the bond. The third time they declared their allegiance was different. This time, they were both adults, the ceremony was much more lengthy and meaningful, and was held in the midst of many witnesses. In The Secret History, the author describes how Temujin and Jamuqa pronounced their friendship to one another with a long oath about how they would be forever tied to each other through their mutual love and care. They then exchanged gifts of valuable loot from aristocrats they had conquered and held a feast to celebrate, then spent the night sleeping together. This extravagant ceremony and the fact that the two men still kept and even created tighter and tighter bonds with each other into adulthood shows how much …show more content…
This final event that would lead to Temujin’s naming was the last encounter between the two rivals. When his rival was finally presented before him, Temujin actually wished to make amends with Jamuqa and rule together, as they would if they had never broken their bond. Jamuqa’s response was that of a man full of regret. He responded with only a request that he be killed in the most honorable way recognized by the Mongols, rather than make up with his old friend. He told Temujin that if he were to be kept alive, he would only prove to be a nuisance to the tribe leader, and that if he were to be killed, Temujin might have less to concern himself with. Without these intentions by Jamuqa, Temujin would not have been named Genghis Khan, because there can of course be only one universal leader for the Mongols, and the legacy we know of today as that of Genghis Khan would have been severely

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Anderson Hatfield

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both of these families were spread all over the region and were widely intermarried with other families and with eachother. Several family names were represented in the struggle, and it has been proven that both families were involved on both sides. The earliest known violence between the two families…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “How Barbaric Were the Barbarians?” I believe that the Mongols were barbaric people during their conquer through Asia because of their killing methods and military tactics. Mongolians had also made some improvement to asia's economic growth. Some could say that because the Mongols were open to all religions within their people group they were not barbaric. But the Mongols were just not completely barbaric because they killed a lot of people for really no reason.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tang Dynasty Dbq

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Once Genghis Khan rose to power, he united the Mongols. The Mongols were highly militaristic and their soldiers were trained to ride horses from a very young age. They were known for their exceptional cavalry and archery skills, as well as their stealth tactics. All of these factors let the Mongols raid cities. Not only did they win over the cities, but the Mongols would slaughter their leaders and people if they were not useful.…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adolf Hitler Comparison

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The impact that he had also made was that he had forbidden people from selling and kidnapping women and had banned the enslavement of any Mongol, and made livestock theft punishable by death (Genghis Khan, Bio.com). He had ordered an adoption of the writing system, and conducted regular census and granted diplomatic immunity to foreign ambassadors, and finally he also had allowed the freedom of religion well before any other tribes elsewhere had got the idea (Genghis Khan, Bio.com) . He had conquered more than twice as much land than any other person in history because he had brought Eastern and Western civilizations together in the process. He had descendants Ogodei and Khubilai, that were also conquerors and taking control of Eastern Europe and the Middle East, and the rest of China (Genghis Khan, Bio.com). In the 14th century Japan and Java had been invaded by the Mongols before the Empire broke apart and then that’s when it started to downhill after Genghis had died and the last ruling descendant was finally disposed of in 1920 (Genghis Khan,…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After they conquered most of the known world and built their own empire, Mongols were known to be two things when it comes to history: great conquerors and barbarians. In terms of the former, no literature can contest that they deserved to be called and regarded as such. Inversely, the case of the latter remains an open debate to historians and even the rest of the world. This paper aims to arrive to a verdict whether the term barbarian is fitting to the Mongols or not. During the time when they were tearing down cities after cities and kingdoms after kingdoms, the Mongols were stereotyped and feared as ruthless vanquishers with barbaric nature.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Women Of Deh Koh Analysis

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Erika Friedl’s ‘Women of Deh Koh: Lives in an Iranian Village,’ a beautiful, multi-faceted mosaic is painted, illustrating the every day lives of women in a modern Iranian mountain village dealing with the adversities of domestic power politics, childbirth, infertility, marriage, and old age. According to Western standards, the situations of these women are primitive and oppressive. However, to the women of Deh Koh, their situations are all they know of life.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the late 1100's, Temujin, a Mongol chieftain who later got to be known as Genghis Khan, rose to power as khan. He started to bring together and sort out the scattered Mongol and other roaming tribes into a prevalent battling power. Genghis Khan was wise, heartless, aspiring, and a strict slave driver. After he turned into the undisputed expert of Mongolia, and "ruler of every last one of people groups staying in felt tents," he set out on a dynamite profession of victory. Genghis Khan meant to prepare the best-trained and best armed force of his time.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difference between vassal and lord shows the ranking of power, and the foundation for feudal relationships of medieval history. Idealised views of feudalism represent honorable agreements between a lord and his vassal or vassals in which they both offered their loyalties to one another in exchange for land and services that were usually military in nature. Instead the Agreement between Count William V of Aquitaine and Hugh IV of Lusignan translated by Paul Hyams of Cornell University, demonstrates the tumultuous relationships between vassal and lord for the struggle of having and maintain power and authority. This literary account shows the conflict that formed between Hugh and William. The text depicts the kinds of relationships that had…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Culture

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    History is outlined by the legacies of several rigidly characterized groups. One such group is the Mongols, a nomadic tribe notorious for both their alleged depravity and despotic founder, Genghis Khan. However, much of this legacy was founded on myth, as opposed to true barbarism. By definition, in order to be civilized, a group must be intellectually, culturally, socially, and materially advanced in human society. To this end, through their military tactics, religious tolerance, encouragement of the arts, legal system, hospitality, infrastructure, and trade, the civilized nature of the Mongols far outweighs their unfounded legacy of barbarism and brutality.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At the time these leaders were treated like royalty and were often praised for their accomplishments like Endiku and Gilgamesh were throughout the epic with a statue being build for Enkidu, the second most exalted military leader in the epic. With the support of evidence from the story of Gilgamesh and interpretations of ancient society, I explain how and why ancient societies exalted their military leaders the way they did. This impacted social, political and economic aspects of their time period due to the important role that military leaders have in such a society such as the saving of the kingdom and rewards they gain for their people as a result of their…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Epic of Gilgamesh and the Iliad, friendship plays an integral transformative role. When Enkidu and Patroclus die, the surviving friends, Gilgamesh and Achilles become better people by exposing their vulnerability through the grieving process. This results in a lifelong transformation. This kind of everlasting friendship is also illustrated by Oeneus and Bellerophon,whose friendship lives on through their grandchildren,after their death. In this paper, I will claim that the Epic of Gilgamesh and the Iliad argue that death has the ability to destroy the physical ties of a sincere friendship, although it can not take away the everlasting positive transformation that culminates from such a friendship, and this is what distinguishes sincere…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “No Great Mischief” by Alistair Macleod is a novel that is told from the first person point of view through Alexander, our protagonist, and uses flashbacks and memories to help the reader understand the family history and dynamic better. The theme of this story is of nostalgia and the importance of family. The history of the family traces back many generations and holds a lot of meaning to each and every one of the family members, also know as clan members. For this essay, my focus is on comparing Calum and Alexander, their differences, their similarities and their masculinity. While reading this book you also have to take note that since this is coming from Alexander's point of view, and this is how he views his brother.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    With his extraordinary military accomplishments and leadership skills, Genghis Khan was a warrior and ruler who united all the nomadic tribes in the steppe of Mongolia and built the largest land empire in the world in the thirteenth century. He left a great legacy through his innovative ideas and laws whilst also promoting religious freedom, allowing an exchange of the global economy between Asia and Europe (Weatherford). However, with a belief that there should be only one ruler under the sky, Genghis Khan was unlikely to forgive those who refused to join forces with him and vanquished millions who wanted to create empires of their own. This presented an image of him and the Mongols as brutal savages who eliminated entire cultures, devastated…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Mongols Research Paper

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It did not matter if he was going to kill families and rip them apart. Chances Mongols sometimes gave the other civilizations a chance to just let them take over but if he did not get his way then they could forget about it and their society would be destroyed until nothing else could be destroyed and they gained land and it was mostly because of the land based military techniques. Evidence from document # 6,9 mongols tried to be nice but it did not always work especially if they did not get what they wanted in a reasonable time. Structure The mongols were so structured they could be told what their duties were and conquer a society within distant.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Golden Horde and Chagatai Khanate Kublai Khan ruled the Yuan Dynasty and Hulagu Khan ruled the Ilkhanate. But there were two other kingdoms that existed inside the Mongol kingdom. The Golden horde and the Chagatai Khanate. Both were ruled by khan’s that were related to Genghis Khan. One was Batu Khan, the son of the first and eldest son of Genghis Khan.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays