Max Weber is known as a German sociologist, who develop the concept of rationalization, a process through which affective ties, spiritually and tradition are replaced by rational calculation, efficiency, and control. He describes the state as an important and powerful force that practice legitimate control over the weapons of violence. Through states, citizens have their opinions to voice their own opinions on how society should be structured. Weber believed that capitalism is not fair hence can become fair and saw that the primary problem of society was the abuse of power by large corporations. Moreover, Weber uses the concept of legitimacy, which refers to the process by which power is not only institutionalized but is also given moral grounding.
…show more content…
Authority to Bendix could be wielded by powerful figures with no sense of nature or character of followers. While Weber believed differences in authority were key in distinguishing between different historical regimes and epochs. Bendix believed it is important to explore from a psychological perspective because through understanding you can sympathize. He also states the three should be an equal balance between leaders and followers. For example, Franklin D. Roosevelt understood the mass unemployment crisis and through his leadership, he created the New Deal which led to stability and legitimacy. Moreover, Bendix is concluding that ideas and ideology are generated by the economic change so as the economy changes, new ideas will emerge. Furthermore, Charles Tilly is understanding the distinguishing between having a revolt and having a revolution. He states that the state is a continuous and central monopoly and becomes a deaminated way where the government is organized. The states reinforce its claim, meaning it tends to acquire a monopoly over a concentrated means of physical concentration within a population inhabiting a large, continuous territory. He is more focusing on the state structure rather than class structure and the changes in the state happen because of
Authority to Bendix could be wielded by powerful figures with no sense of nature or character of followers. While Weber believed differences in authority were key in distinguishing between different historical regimes and epochs. Bendix believed it is important to explore from a psychological perspective because through understanding you can sympathize. He also states the three should be an equal balance between leaders and followers. For example, Franklin D. Roosevelt understood the mass unemployment crisis and through his leadership, he created the New Deal which led to stability and legitimacy. Moreover, Bendix is concluding that ideas and ideology are generated by the economic change so as the economy changes, new ideas will emerge. Furthermore, Charles Tilly is understanding the distinguishing between having a revolt and having a revolution. He states that the state is a continuous and central monopoly and becomes a deaminated way where the government is organized. The states reinforce its claim, meaning it tends to acquire a monopoly over a concentrated means of physical concentration within a population inhabiting a large, continuous territory. He is more focusing on the state structure rather than class structure and the changes in the state happen because of