How Did John Locke Think The Executive Is The Supreme Power

Decent Essays
I am not convinced that Locke really thinks that the legislature is the supreme power. I believe that Locke thinks the executive is the supreme power. Locke begins off in chapter 14 by perceiving that, in any thoughtful society, circumstances will emerge that must be managed before the administrative can be amassed to give laws to them. In these cases, the executive may practice official right, or essentially "good judgment." The official is qualified to take activities that are outside the laws' system, if their activities propel the general public's best advantage. He characterizes this right as "nothing but the power of doing public good without rule.” He Also notes that he does not think the the legislature should always be in sessions

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    His quote on the definition of tyranny is that no matter what there still is an issue of someone or a group wanting to create…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spencer Escue Coach Quinn European History November 24, 2015 The Ideas of John Locke A philosopher is someone who is engaged or learned in philosophy. So who were some of the greatest philosophers?…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Enlightenment took place in the 1700's in Europe John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were two important people in the Enlightenment. But John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both had different views on government and humanity. John Locke believed that all humans were born with a blank mind and were influenced by experiences in their environment. By doing that, they could learn from experience to improve themselves. He also favored self-government.…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In document 1, Locke states, “political power is that power, which every man having in the state of nature, has given up into the hands of society…” Basically, he is saying that every person is born with power,…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke believed that the government should be ran by the people and everything should be made in the people’s favor. In the situation where the old government fails he recommended the legislative and executive branches but this decision is should be made by people. John Locke once stated in the “Second treatise on the Civil Government” “All Men are naturally “a state of perfect freedom… within the bounds of the law of nature”(Document A). What he meant from this is that We are all free and no one can stop us.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, as of now that is all he considers it to be. A legislature is nothing without its kin. So how has the day come that the people are unable to dictate the ultimate fate of their lives. In many cases it still remains unseen or overlooked within the very realms of society. For example, men do not fail to be cheated by their neighbors and not have their opinions heard.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antigone Case Study

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Furthermore, he argues that “the only way to erect such a Common Power… Is to conferre all their power and strength upon one Man, or upon one Assembly of men, that may reduce their Wills, by plurality of voices, unto one Will,”…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I feel that John Locke’s view on government had a greater impact on the revolutions more than Smiths had. Smiths did change the economy for the better however John Locke had changed the government from a monarchy king/queen style of ruling to a simple democracy. He wrote many pieces to support his views as well. Two Treaties concerning civil Government and Common Sense were two of his works. In the “Two Treaties concerning civil Government”, he defended the claim that all men are free and equal.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Locke’s view the law of nature dictates two things, self-preservation, and preservation of all others as long as those goals don’t conflict. That is the most we can give to government when we create on out of political society. Since that is all the possible power people can give to the government the legislative powers necessarily limited to preserving the political society which set it up. That general limitation breaks down into four specifications which explains why people can’t remain in the state of nature.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke, therefore, disqualifies any doctrine that sovereignty belonged by nature a man of destiny. According to him, there is no political power at the state of society, resulting from free contract by men to make laws. However, the laws are legitimate only if they accurately reflect the natural rights of man are his personal freedom, but also his right to property and the right to exchange the…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As he writes in his book The Spirit of the Laws: “When the [lawmaking] and law-enforcing powers are hinted in the same person…there can be no liberty.” (“The Spirit of the Laws”). What he meant by this idea is that if any two powers of the three branches of government were possessed by a single person or branch, people would live unfree within society due to…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So, he brings up compelling argument that those who are most virtuous should rule (100-103). While in the “Second Treatise of Government” Locke explains the nature of humanity, state of nature, and the civil government. Locke’s belief is that all humans are born into…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social order is the foundation for all other rights, but yet this does not come from nature, but from convention. He criticizes the Natural Law for being too independent, working towards one’s own gain over others, instead of the unified push for the good of the general will. Yet he promises a man retains his independent rights when joining the Body Politic, just as all men are said to do. However, when it comes to his “might does not equal right” arguments, we are led to believe that a person is born with rights, natural rights, that cannot be taken away simply because someone has established some sort of power dynamic. Might does not equal right and just because someone is stronger does not imply anything about their capability to rule.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is a clear distinction between rationalism and empiricism–two theories of epistemology, which focuses on the theory knowledge through a philosophical lens. Rationalism centers around the ability to use knowledge with reasoning and that knowledge comes from innate ideas. Others believe that our senses could actually lead to true knowledge, as opposed to relying on innate ideas and reasoning. Many criticize rationalism and whether innate knowledge exists or is even pertinent. In this paper, I will provide explanations and background on the theory of rationalism, discuss the differing views of rationalism and empiricism from various philosophers, and illustrate their significance.…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays